Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝑯𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒎

@lotiotkai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

717subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004382942202
TypeChannel
Username@lotiotkai
Created15 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lotiotkai

Growth

704717710.57 Aug 2026, 19:37 — 704 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:18 — 704 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 16:08 — 717 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:378 Aug 2026, 16:08
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 702–719 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 16:08717+13
8 Aug 2026, 02:18704no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:37704first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
86.9%
avg views ÷ 717 subscribers
Avg views / post
623
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (15 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,850
Reactions total400
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

400 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53527337486244026827218.0%
custom 53259024780409105546917.3%
custom 54160718761516477705012.5%
custom 53530649765022620414511.3%
custom 5327789630836197250379.25%
custom 5321441944050627583338.25%
custom 5352578240743508457276.75%
custom 5352854888176977302246.00%
custom 5352732717832243248184.50%
custom 5352655051938631269143.50%
custom 5325717854576722716112.75%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
18
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lotiotkai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC86 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

1 вариант — 🌟 2 вариант — 🤍 3 вариант —✨ итоги в 15:00 (08.08.) по мск

custom 532590247804091055430custom 53257178545767227167custom 53277896308361972505

7 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC107 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

реакции — и выкладываю выбор

custom 535273374862440268212custom 53277896308361972504custom 53530649765022620414

7 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC108 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

так, родные мои. у нас завтра суббота, а в субботу у нас игры на звезды. Давайте щас тогда определимся, во что играть будем?

custom 535273374862440268214custom 53214419440506275835custom 53528548881769773024custom 53259024780409105542custom 53257178545767227161custom 53277896308361972501custom 53526550519386312691custom 53530649765022620411

5 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC391 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☺️ являюсь владельцем телеграмм-канала «𝑯𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒎». #Новелла — @Demonit_der. И спешу сообщить важную новость.➖ ☺️ы заключаем союз с телеграмм-каналом «ꜰʟᴏᴏᴅᴇʀs’ ᴄᴏɴꜰᴇssɪᴏɴ». 🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍 ☺️ладельцем является #Немец, его юзернейм для связи — @Nemo_zik 🤍дата союза - 05. 08.||2026 Надеюсь на долгое сотрудничество🌟

custom 532590247804091055411custom 53277896308361972507custom 53214419440506275836custom 53530649765022620412custom 53257178545767227161

5 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC358 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

я конечно все понимаю..😵‍💫 очень рада и благодарна, но зачем так много😭

custom 532778963083619725014custom 53530649765022620416

4 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC378 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

хахахха, почему вы не гей?( я расстроена 😵‍💫 спасибо большое!

custom 53530649765022620412custom 53214419440506275831custom 53257178545767227161

2 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC654 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

ой пасиба большое🤍

custom 535273374862440268212custom 53259024780409105544custom 53277896308361972502

31 Jul 2026, 21:14 UTC748 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

йоу, удачи вам хорошо провести последний месяц лета!

custom 532590247804091055415custom 53526550519386312697custom 53527337486244026826custom 53277896308361972503custom 53214419440506275831custom 53257178545767227161

28 Jul 2026, 01:11 UTC≈1,210 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026

кста, люблю вас🌟

custom 535306497650226204121custom 532144194405062758312custom 53527327178322432488custom 53525782407435084572custom 53277896308361972501custom 53527337486244026821custom 53528548881769773021custom 54160718761516477701

26 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,070 views121 reactions18 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌟 нет в чате — нету приза. 🌟отзывы — тап. 🌟прайс — тап. 🌟буст — тап. проводит лоты/владелец — @Demonit_der - #Новелла менеджер/рассыльщик — @wwinwd - #Лея админ по лотам/помощник — @NechoDrekl02 - #𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑦 админ по поиску покупателей/помощник —@kan44ki - #Канеки наш чатик — тап. ➖➖➖➖➖ находиться в чате обязательно. нету в чате? нет приза. сообщения канала чистятся переодически. заход в чат после о

custom 541607187615164777048custom 535257824074350845720custom 535285488817697730219custom 53530649765022620417custom 53259024780409105546custom 53527337486244026826custom 53214419440506275835custom 53526550519386312695

26 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,740 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🤍🤍🤍🤍 25 человек - 30💜 30 человек - 35💜 40 человек - 45💜 45 человек - 50💜 50 человек - 55💜 ❗дальше идет другой прайс. уточнять у владельца.❗ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤❗ 🌟мы не несем ответственность за отписки/блоки. а так же на время закрытия лоты. 🌟делаем лоты от 25 человек. ❗если победитель конкурса не выполнил условия, то приз автоматом сгорает. ❗ 🤍🤍🤍 по поводу покупки пишите в лс. @Demonit_der / @wwinwd телеграмм-канал: h

custom 535273374862440268221custom 53525782407435084575custom 53527327178322432485custom 53214419440506275833custom 53530649765022620412custom 53259024780409105541custom 53526550519386312691custom 54160718761516477701

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @lotiotkai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 368,531 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑯𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒎” (@lotiotkai), 717 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lotiotkai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.