Channel
@lossmemoir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
263subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002416159447 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lossmemoir |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lossmemoir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 263 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 264 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 267 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 268 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 268 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
71 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 64.8% | |
| 💯 | 25 | 35.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2025 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
my initial plan was to full port spot $hype once btc drops, but it ran so hard in the meantime that now i can't call it cheap either. its not as attractive as it was before the recent etf/adoption flows or whatever. which leaves me in an awkward spot, since other alts like sol and eth are garbage that has absolutely zero reason to perform any time soon. still haven't made my mind up on exactly how bad the saylor st…
❤10💯1
Sticker, posted without a caption
interesting
❤1
i wholeheartedly, for the sake of our sanity, wish bitcoin just goes to ATHs and catches up with stocks etc, but I cannot in good faith say it looks good at all. literally 75 days of building up higher lows after higher lows. stairs up elevator down is how this shit is looking to me.
💯3
zora is clearly the most overvalued launchpad in crypto right??? what am i missing
https://x.com/100xgk/status/1976327179404444056
i think we are closer to the end of this downtrend than the start. if we get a bvol/dvol blowout im buying sound assets heavy. $hype most likely. im getting bonkfun vs pumpfun pvp vibes from aster vs hyperliquid and other dexes rn.. (hype won and all others faded away overtime) i think same happens with hype but prolly ltf lower first.
❤3
i think about running a challenge right now 10k to 100k or maybe 1k to 30k or sum shit tell me what'd be more entertaining; shitters on base and sol or hyperliquid perps or both? ill be streaming on twitch regardless, test stream soon https://www.twitch.tv/100xgk
❤4
GG P is P
💯6❤1
i think pepe goes for it this week. and that'll mark the local top.
💯4
yeah bros this shit is very overbought idc what anyone has to say
❤4
eth daily RSI is the most overbought its been since the bear market bottom second longest daily green candle streak since the bottom whats the last time eth ever got a 75% in 4 weeks without retracing that shi 3 out of 4 last times resulted in months of chop and probably alt death i just dont think we're teleporting above 4k into moonboy territory without punishing late longs first unless some crazy catalyst like…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lossmemoir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“100xgk's loss memoir” (@lossmemoir), 263 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lossmemoir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.