Come mi sento ad aver caricato 4 libri su zlib dopo averne scaricati 5k

Channel
varie ed eventuali
@losfogatoiodisam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
109subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001570090952 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @losfogatoiodisam |
| Description | di tutto un po' ma soprattutto shitpost cringe but hot asf not a meme page Craft: https://t.me/+wLJLLIHtxIdmMzg0 Libretti: https://t.me/+tlRIIlGH0eo0ZTBk |
| Created | 20 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/losfogatoiodisam |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 109 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 109 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 73.0%
- avg views ÷ 109 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 79.5
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,034 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,700
- Videos
- ≈1,170
- Links
- ≈209
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
https://www.dykefilmarchive.com/
E non sto scherzando, è l'unico modo con cui riesco a giustificare di aver appena sentito due signore di Bari dire quanto è bella la riviera romagnola, siamo letteralmente al delirio, per fortuna che tra poco scendo
Anche se il vero problema è la completa mancanza di ossigeno nelle carrozze, l'unico che probabilmente non ha il cervello rallentato al momento è il tizio con la macchinetta dell'ossigeno e i tubicini che glielo pompano direttamente nel naso ogni due secondi
Chissà perché trenitalia non ha vie di mezzo tra la temperatura del polo e quella del centro della terra
Cosa se attaccassimo dei seggiolini alle pale eoliche
Mio ideale di vacanza nel 2026: leggere in spiaggia dall'alba al tramonto, guardare film in giardino tutta la notte
Momento più atteso della transizione: quello in cui finalmente mi sta crescendo il sentierino dall'ombelico al cazzo
Se pensavate fossero imbarazzanti le scene di sesso nei film sedutx sul divano con i vostri genitori, vi sblocco un nuovo livello: la pubblicità del LUBRIFICANTE vagisil mentre guardate la signora in giallo con vostra NONNA
In molte famiglie, come già in quella della De Angelis, c'era un tale che si presentava come malato mentale. «Voi che lavoro fate?» domandavo, e lui, dopo un'esitazione, cercando di sorridere: «Malato mentale». Il mare non bagna Napoli - Anna Maria Ortese
In realtà penso si sia allontanato perché io ho la capacità ignorare gente fastidiosa anche a 50cm da me, comportandomi come se non esistesse. Però il discorso dei peli resta valido a giudicare dagli sguardi di disgusto che ogni tanto ricevo per strada e dal fatto che sono l'unica persona non-uomo-cis su sta spiaggia ad averne
Uomini in spiaggia vedranno una persona con le tette al vento e si avvicineranno tentando di attirare la sua attenzione -perché dopotutto se è lì così sarà chiaramente a loro uso e consumo- per poi allontanarsi nel vedere la quantità di peli presenti dalla vita in giù È il 2026 e la cosa più scandalosa da mostrare in pubblico sono ancora i peli su corpi percepiti come femminili
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @losfogatoiodisam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“varie ed eventuali” (@losfogatoiodisam), 109 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/losfogatoiodisam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.