Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РЕСТmaety.. «🩷» +𝟒ֻ𝆬𝐎𝟒ֻ𝆬

Channel

РЕСТmaety.. «🩷» +𝟒ֻ𝆬𝐎𝟒ֻ𝆬

@loresimi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004305807184
TypeChannel
Username@loresimi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 27 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/loresimi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12181529 August 2026 — 18 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15 subscribers12 October 2026 — 13 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12 subscribers29 August 202619 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 51 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Oct 2026, 08:5012-1
12 Oct 2026, 14:3713-2
8 Sept 2026, 12:3815-3
29 Aug 2026, 16:1518no change
29 Aug 2026, 16:0018first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 27 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘375.0%
😈125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC7 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @flood_cakes

1 »» 150 тавайте, пожалуйста 😔 #сзрп

29 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC8 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @infoozerofloodFile

#Giselle хочу сделать пиар на флуд где совлд! — @Louisflood у нас сейчас идёт перенабор, влд в ресте и актива совсем нет( очень хотелось чтоб вы зашли, там много комфортных админов, красивое оформление, и много свободных ролей! по поводу вступления можете писать @Hyunjinnnni8 // @api_6426 так же были бы рады союзам ! по поводу союза писать @Culturaaal #0срз

29 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC3 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @flood_cakesPhoto

Ɯᥙᥰᥰы ᥰρ᧐ɸᥙ᧘ᥱᥔ условия: ▷ Подписка на канал, без дальнейшей отписки ▷ Репост этого поста в инфо/3 друзьям + скрин (сз не обязательно) ▷ Точка в комм ▷ Участвовать могут не только сз!! Не беру: без авы, рж, парные авы, совмы места: 6/10 #сзрп

28 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC8 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @flood_cakesPhoto

ᥒᥱᥕ ᥎iɗᥱ᧐ .. 𝗶𝗱: not ours 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿: wooyoung #сзрп

28 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC11 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @JisooflooddVideo

ƝξŴ Ŵ𑀡ƊξΟ✶⋆.˚ ⊹ ࣪ ﹏𓊝﹏𓂁﹏⊹ ࣪ ˖ #какойякотик

28 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC5 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @flood_cakesPoll

что проводим?

  1. шиппы флудов10%
  2. ассоциации флудов35%
  3. шиппы аккаунтов45%
  4. ассоциации аккаунтов23%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC6 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @flood_cakesPhoto

ᥒᥱᥕ ᥎iɗᥱ᧐ .. 𝗶𝗱: not ours 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿: wooyoung #сзрп

28 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC6 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @flood_cakesPhoto

ᥒᥱᥕ ᥎iɗᥱ᧐ .. 𝗶𝗱: not ours 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿: wooyoung #сзрп

27 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

онет🤍🤍белая жыдкость по всему экрану🤍🤍 я не могу 🤍🤍 нормально писа🤍🤍ть

💘1

27 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @flood_cakesPhoto

ᅠ𝗰𝗸 .. 𝐍avigation 、、 🛍.In𝐅Oᅠᅠ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ RO𝐋ES .. « 𝗮dmins »ᅠRU𝐋ES ❰ 🩷 ❱ . . ◁ ▕⃝⃤ 𝗯oost and 𝘁ik 𝘁ok ᅠ» 𝘂nion ⎯ RE𝐒T & 𝗮rchive 猴子的共同所有者兼高级管理员。🍨 По всем вопросам писать: ᅠ 🧁ᅠᅠ ⎯ @jj_alni 、、@pond02zz (переходник)

💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @loresimi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTCFinal Results31 voters

что проводим?

  1. шиппы флудов10%
  2. ассоциации флудов35%
  3. шиппы аккаунтов45%
  4. ассоциации аккаунтов23%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РЕСТmaety.. «🩷» +𝟒ֻ𝆬𝐎𝟒ֻ𝆬” (@loresimi), 12 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loresimi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.