Channel
@lorealproua
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,317subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001901329493 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lorealproua |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lorealproua |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 1,317 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 1,315 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 1,313 | +6 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 1,307 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (25 August 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,166 |
| Reactions total | 51 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
51 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 78.4% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 9.80% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 5.88% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ідеальний блонд сьогодні. А яким він буде через два тижні? У відео Ірина Філіппова, технологиня L’Oréal Professionnel, розбирає, чому відтінок блонду може швидко втрачати бажаний результат і які технологічні помилки на це впливають. Хочете розібратися ще глибше? На навчаннях BLOND STUDIO поглиблюємо знання для впевненої роботи з блондом. 💻 15.09 о 11:00 — онлайн-вебінар (реєстрація тут) 📍 17.09 — МК в Одесі 📍 17.09…
Video, posted without a caption
🔥3🥰2
Чому один відтінок нейтралізує інший? Як працює оксидант? Що насправді відбувається під час фарбування? 8 вересня на вебінарі «Основи колористики» закладаємо базу, на якій будується впевнена робота колориста. Разом розберемо: 🔹 теорію кольору та роботу з колірним кругом; 🔹 механізм дії оксидантів і фарбників; 🔹 ключові продукти L’Oréal Professionnel для роботи з кольором; 🔹 як доповнити сервіс ритуалом Absolut Repai…
❤1
А ви вже пройшли навчання French Blending?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🇫🇷 French Blending уже у вашому списку опанованих технік? Опануйте вишуканий, сучасний підхід до роботи із сивиною та навчайтеся створювати м’який, природний результат із делікатним відростанням. І головне — навчання безкоштовне, а формат можна обрати під себе: 📍 Офлайн — МК French Blending, м. Хмельницький, 10 вересня о 10:00 💻 Онлайн — навчання French Blending на L’Oréal Access у зручний для вас час. Обирайте с…
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
📆 Вільне віконце? Так, на навчання. Бо коли ти стиліст, у календарі поруч із клієнтами, фарбуваннями та робочими планами завжди знайдеться місце для нового compétence 🇫🇷 L’Oréal Professionnel збирає навчання, які хочеться одразу додавати у свій професійний календар. Знаходь актуальні дати в закріпленому повідомленні 👆
👍2
🔥 До МК «Мистецтво управління сивиною» залишилося зовсім трохи. На вас чекають техныки, які розширять ваші можливості в роботі із сивиною. 👉 Уже 10 вересня розширюємо PROфесійні сервіси одразу трьома сервісами: від експрес-камуфлювання до безшовної інтеграції сивини та радикального перевтілення. Навчання для колористів, які хочуть не працювати за одним сценарієм, а обирати техніку відповідно до запиту, вихідної баз…
❤3
Якби колористи складали новий алфавіт, він виглядав би саме так 😎 Разом із тренеркою L'Oréal Professionnel Владмірою Мешбейн зібрали літери, за якими ховаються професійні рішення для щоденної роботи. Які з них ваші улюблені? Діліться в коментарях 😉
🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
❤9🔥1🥰1
Зменшення пухнастості — один із найчастіших запитів клієнтів. І у стилістів L’Oréal Professionnel є дієва відповідь на нього ✨ Гама Keratin Alpha Sleek розроблена для гладкості, блиску та неймовірно-доглянутого вигляду волосся. Як перетворити її на повноцінний сервіс і підтримувати результат? технологиня бренду Катерина Єгорова, розповідає у відео. Дивіться та зберігайте відео 🖤
❤8
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lorealproua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А ви вже пройшли навчання French Blending?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“L’Oréal Pro Україна” (@lorealproua), 1,317 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lorealproua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.