Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MICHEAL INFOS πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ

Channel

MICHEAL INFOS πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ

@lordbets11

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

1,289subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002057210787
TypeChannel
Username@lordbets11
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lordbets11

Growth

1,2871,3021,294.57 August 2026 β€” 1,302 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,302 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 1,299 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 1,300 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 1,296 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 1,289 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 1,287 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 1,289 subscribers1,2897 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,285–1,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 03:491,289+2
24 Aug 2026, 13:441,287-2
20 Aug 2026, 22:131,289-7
17 Aug 2026, 15:091,296-4
14 Aug 2026, 01:481,300+1
10 Aug 2026, 14:511,299-3
7 Aug 2026, 22:321,302no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:381,302first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 January 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀7364.6%
πŸ”₯1311.5%
πŸ₯°1210.6%
πŸ‘65.31%
🀯54.42%
πŸ†21.77%
🀩21.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2025 to 11 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jan 2025, 19:01 UTCβ‰ˆ5,720 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Congratulations To All Of You πŸ’΅ We Proved Again And Again That Here We Have Only Manipulated Games πŸ’° Thanks For Giving Us The TrustπŸ†

❀24πŸ”₯5🀯3

11 Jan 2025, 07:05 UTCβ‰ˆ5,440 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Congratulations To All Of You πŸ’΅ We Proved Again And Again That Here We Have Only Manipulated Games πŸ’° Thanks For Giving Us The TrustπŸ†

❀8πŸ‘1

10 Jan 2025, 23:04 UTCβ‰ˆ4,780 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Tip : Over 4.5 goals Half Time Odd : 14.00 Games is 1000% safe and manipulated βœ…

❀10

10 Jan 2025, 11:03 UTCβ‰ˆ4,510 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Only 600 Stars ⭐️ For Everyone Stake High πŸ”₯πŸ”₯

❀8

10 Jan 2025, 11:03 UTCβ‰ˆ4,350 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Do not waste your time ! This Game will win 100% πŸ₯‡

❀3

10 Jan 2025, 11:02 UTCβ‰ˆ4,230 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I Placed 2K € For This Game !! Match Is 100% Safe And Guaranteed To Win βœ… Don’t Waste This βœ…

❀2

10 Jan 2025, 09:58 UTCβ‰ˆ3,920 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Match Is 100% Safe And Guaranteed To Win βœ… Don’t Forget This βœ…

❀2

10 Jan 2025, 09:55 UTCβ‰ˆ3,490 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❀5πŸ‘3

10 Jan 2025, 09:41 UTCβ‰ˆ2,900 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Congratulations To All Of You πŸ’΅ We Proved Again And Again That Here We Have Only Manipulated Games πŸ’° Thanks For Giving Us The TrustπŸ†

❀1

9 Jan 2025, 21:08 UTCβ‰ˆ2,430 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Totuca F - Mazatlan FC F Full Time : Over 3.5 goals Odd : 3.00 Games is 1000% safe and manipulated βœ…

❀6

9 Jan 2025, 00:03 UTCβ‰ˆ2,050 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Games All Won πŸ’Ž

πŸ”₯7πŸ†2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lordbets11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fixed VIP | EliteTicket
@EliteFixedTicket Β· 107,304
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 71 here β€” alongside 70 others β€” read 28 August 2026
David info⚑️
@Davidinfo2002 Β· 53,121
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here β€” alongside 82 others β€” read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œMICHEAL INFOS πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ” (@lordbets11), 1,289 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lordbets11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.