Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LOOK ME LIKE

Channel

LOOK ME LIKE

@lookmelikeee

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,995subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001435836969
TypeChannel
Username@lookmelikeee
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lookmelikeee

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,9847,0086,99611 August 2026 — 7,005 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,003 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,000 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,997 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,987 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,992 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,001 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,008 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,993 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,988 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,984 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,006 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,995 subscribers6,99511 August 202628 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 47 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,980–7,012 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 07:426,995-11
18 Sept 2026, 23:177,006+22
14 Sept 2026, 22:416,984-4
11 Sept 2026, 16:166,988-5
7 Sept 2026, 01:166,993-15
2 Sept 2026, 00:277,008+7
30 Aug 2026, 05:137,001+9
24 Aug 2026, 16:446,992+5
20 Aug 2026, 14:566,987-10
17 Aug 2026, 21:576,997-3
15 Aug 2026, 03:127,000-3
12 Aug 2026, 05:427,003-2
11 Aug 2026, 20:007,005first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12983.2%
🔥1912.3%
👍74.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC539 views39 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Уважительная причина моего отсутствия - долгожданный отпуск 💔 Наш мини-трип по Турции, (который вот-вот уже завершится) в картинках! У нас было 2 локации: Каш — пляжный, релакс-отдых, и Стамбул, где в планах было изучить город, много гулять, шопиться и окунуться в реальный турецкий вайб) По Кашу: нам там очень понравилось! Жили в Novva Hotel. Номер обычный, бассейна на территории нет , до него нужно ехать на машин…

❤36👍3

9 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,270 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

как говорится, готовь сани летом я не хочу думать, какие будут цены на верхнюю одежду к осени/ зиме, поэтому пока есть возможность взять, что- то на сейл - беру! Увидела у бренда Саши Буримовой Nexdor этот пуховик, а это именно то, что я искала каждую зиму! Очень рекомендую присмотреться) Взяла себе серый ( в размере S) хоть и на светлый более приятная цена, но для меня это непрактично. Если тоже хотите чуть сэко…

❤13🔥10

8 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,260 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

последние удачные покупки Maag Первый джемпер я заприметила сразу, по крою он очень простой, но за счет фактуры смотрится очень стилево , а я такое люблю босоножки с тонкими ремешками в духе 90х . Не могу сказать, что они удобные , как тапочки, но для босоножек на тонком каблуке весьма неплохие и последняя , необычная рубашка без рукавов,немного в стиле японского авангарда, такое мы тоже любим) * носить, кстати, …

❤24🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,430 views31 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

У DAISYKNIT вышла новая коллекция «Тихое лето» Я как ее увидела, сразу подумала, что из нее получится шикарная летне/осенняя капсула, потому - что все изделия вне времени и очень универсальны. За основу взяла белое хлопковое платье, юбку в полоску и брюки из плотного хлопка, а дальше собирала вокруг них разные комплекты) Именно так, на мой взгляд, и выглядит функциональный гардероб. Когда каждая вещь сочетается с …

❤25🔥6

3 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC≈1,770 views35 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Befree, Zarina, Sela, Love Republic видимо тоже пытаются распродать остатки на WB и неприлично снизили цены на многие позиции.. но, прошу, будьте бдительны и подходите к выбору осознанно 🙌🏻 берите только то, что действительно необходимо и будет работать в вашем гардеробе! 🙏🏼

❤31👍4

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @lookmelikeee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Софи Балябина 🧚‍♀️
@balyabina_sofi · 46,645
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
Александр Ганин | О стиле
@sashganinstyle · 23,849
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LOOK ME LIKE” (@lookmelikeee), 6,995 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lookmelikeee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.