Channel
@longchensans
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002392612951 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @longchensans |
| Description | As was spoken, the stars aligned, and fate has taken its due course. |
| Created | 30 January 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/longchensans |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 7 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 7 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 30 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2025 to 5 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Freedom.gov 是什么？美国正在推进的“官方 VPN”项目解析 近期，多家国际媒体报道了一个名为 Freedom.gov 的项目，引发大量关注。它被部分媒体称为“美国官方 VPN 平台”。那么，这到底是什么？ 一、项目背景 据报道，该项目由 U.S. Department of State（美国国务院）推动，使用 .gov 官方域名，意味着它属于美国联邦政府体系内的项目，而非民间科技公司。 相关消息最早由 Reuters 报道，随后 The Guardian 等媒体也进行了跟进。 二、Freedom.gov 的定位 根据公开报道，它的目标包括： 为全球用户提供访问被本地限制内容的途径 通过技术手段绕过某些地区的内容封锁 支持“数字信息自由”战略 有媒体将其描述为一种“官方支持的网络访问工具”，功能上类似 VPN。 三、技术形式（目前已知） 公开信息显示： 可能包含类似 VPN 的流量转发功能 访问流量可能通过美国基础设施…
最近确实有很多新闻提到一个叫 Freedom.gov 的项目，它正在成为美国政府推动“数字自由访问”战略的一部分。根据多家国际媒体的最新报导： 🧭 Freedom.gov 目前是一个由美国政府开发的在线门户平台，据说目的是帮助全球网民绕过各国政府对网络内容的限制，实现匿名访问开放互联网的体验。这个项目有几个核心特点：� Reuters +1 官方背景：该网站由 U.S. Department of State（美国国务院）推动开发，并采用 .gov 域名，表明它由美国联邦政府运营，而不是民间 VPN 服务。� NTDChinese 目标和定位：官方宣传称它能让包括欧洲、亚洲、中东等地区用户访问被本国或地区封锁的内容，包括被禁止的信息或受审查的网络内容。报道提到的目的包括对抗某些国家的严格审查制度，以及回应对“数字言论限制”的不满。� Reuters +1 技术方案：据媒体报道，该平台预计会集成类似 VPN（虚拟私人网络） 的功能…
哈哈哈，激动人心的时刻要到了。
够无耻
OpenAI封禁疑与中国政府有关联的账户 据路透社报道，OpenAI在最新发布的公共威胁报告中说，一些用户要求聊天机器人概述社交媒体“监听”（listening）工具和其他监控概念，这违反了公司的国家安全政策。 在美中围绕人工智能技术发展和规则制定展开日益激烈的竞争之际，OpenAI在报告中提出了对生成式人工智能可能被滥用的安全疑虑。 OpenAI还表示，已封禁若干中文账户，这些账户利用ChatGPT协助实施网络钓鱼、传播恶意软件等活动。这些账户还让ChatGPT帮他们研究如何借助中国的深度求索（DeepSeek）实现更多自动化操作。 中国驻美大使馆未立即回应有关该报告的置评请求。 来源：联合早报
🤬1
突然发现了一个非常隐蔽的Telegram设置
想和大家说一下，这个频道更新什么都随缘目前还没有找到合适的主题，目前我会分享我觉得有意思的内容😉
👍4
人類史上最大！中共全球維穩系統大曝光 https://youtube.com/watch?v=8fwzfkUyNps&si=Tlkg-ZFpdaPX6pqK
https://youtu.be/_zJszP76nEE?si=SDpobQmOJP1jWYLf
帕斯卡契约 一、游戏背景与玩法概述 游戏设定在一个太阳沉落、世界被“黑雾”吞噬、仅存光明之地靠“巨像”照耀的末世。你将扮演一位前审判官特伦斯（Terrence），在寻找妻子的旅途中，揭开一个又一个诡秘世界的真相。 核心玩法特色： 类魂式战斗（Stamina机制+硬核回避/格挡） 多角色切换，每人玩法不同（剑士、狂战士、枪炮手等） 深度故事线与多结局 极具挑战的Boss战 养成与装备系统丰富 --- 二、游戏优点汇总（逐点详述） 类型 优点 说明 画面表现 🎨 精致的暗黑美术风格 光影运用出色，氛围浓郁，极具魂系美感。 📱 移动端画质优异 在手机上几乎达到主机级水准，优化出色。 音效与音乐 🎵 史诗级原声音乐 BGM气势恢宏，氛围营造极强，情绪引导力佳。 🔊 音效打击感强 攻击、命中、敌人死亡音效都具打击爽感。 战斗系统 ⚔️ 类魂式硬核战斗机制 耐力管理、闪避、背刺、Boss机制类似《黑魂》。 🧠…
Channel name was changed to «As I said»
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @longchensans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“As I said” (@longchensans), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/longchensans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.