Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЛондонВиза. Правила и визы.

Channel

ЛондонВиза. Правила и визы.

@londonvisa_ru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,267subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001105067075
TypeChannel
Username@londonvisa_ru
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/londonvisa_ru

Topic

Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,24110,28410,262.57 August 2026 — 10,284 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,284 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,283 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,281 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,275 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,272 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,273 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,269 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,267 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,270 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,260 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,256 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,255 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,261 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,263 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,259 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,262 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,268 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,272 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,276 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,271 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,270 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,272 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,269 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,276 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,275 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,255 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,241 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,244 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,249 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,259 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,267 subscribers10,2677 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,235–10,290 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:5610,267+8
15 Sept 2026, 21:5710,259+10
14 Sept 2026, 08:4110,249+5
10 Sept 2026, 21:2110,244+3
7 Sept 2026, 21:2010,241-14
4 Sept 2026, 20:2110,255-20
3 Sept 2026, 05:5810,275-1
2 Sept 2026, 00:3310,276+7
1 Sept 2026, 02:2710,269-3
31 Aug 2026, 05:1310,272+2
30 Aug 2026, 03:4410,270-1
29 Aug 2026, 02:2510,271-5
28 Aug 2026, 00:5410,276+4
26 Aug 2026, 23:4910,272+4
25 Aug 2026, 20:2410,268+6
24 Aug 2026, 17:0510,262+3
21 Aug 2026, 15:5210,259-4
20 Aug 2026, 11:2510,263+2
19 Aug 2026, 12:1610,261+6
18 Aug 2026, 14:2710,255first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 10,267 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total1,030
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

919 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
45849.8%
🔥13714.9%
👍859.25%
👎444.79%
🕊333.59%
😁333.59%
custom 5429107651650813515313.37%
🤣252.72%
💯212.29%
😱101.09%
🤔101.09%
🤝90.979%
🙏60.653%
😢50.544%
🤡30.326%
custom 542929526441222869720.218%
💩20.218%
🤬20.218%
💋10.109%
💔10.109%
1 further kind10.109%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 919 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @londonvisa_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,030 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Статистика отказов по Британии за первое полугодие 2026 г. ✅ Граждане России получили 93% положительных решений по визит визе. А это значит, что отказов было всего 7%. Неплохо, если сравнивать этот процент с годом-двумя ранее. Источник здесь Давайте ловить момент и подаваться, пока выдают. 🔘Пишите🔘@londonvisa_help

27🔥6🕊3🤝3

18 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈2,350 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧 У офицеров есть разные списки вопросов, которые они должны задать сами себе при принятии решения о вашей визе. Не уверена, что у них есть на это время при рассмотрении кейсов. Но предупреждён, значит вооружён… лучше при подаче всё учесть, чтоб отказ не получить. ➡️На скрине вы видите вопросы для саморефлексии офицера в том случае, если вы сделали ошибку. Эти вопросы помогают ему понять, специально это было, и ст

8😱4🔥3🕊1🤝1

17 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈2,310 views37 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🪪 Бытует мнение, что на визы в Британию нужно подавать последовательно. Да, в некоторых случаях это так. ✈️ Если вы много не путешествовали по миру, то стоит им показать серьёзность намерений в соблюдении визовых правил. А именно: подать на визу на полгода, слетать спокойно на заявленную неделю-две, вернуться. Можно за полгода слетать ещё разок на неделю. И затем подавать на 2-5 лет, если планируете ещё поездки. ✅Н

18👍8🔥6🤔4🕊1

12 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈2,930 views41 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Одиноким девушкам не дают визы?! ❗️Всё не так однозначно. Вот наша клиентка получила визу в Британию. Первую! Работает в найме с небольшой зарплатой и учится на заочке. ✅На поездку мама подарила денег. Да, так тоже можно. Но при условии, что свои финансы для жизни в стране нормальные. Если вы хотите полететь в Британию, но думаете, что вы визу не получите, то пишите @londonvisa_help. Вероятно вы просто недооценива

29🔥8👍2🕊2

3 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈3,740 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026

⁉️Итак, когда же мы можем рекомендовать показать только баланс при подаче на визу?! ✔️Всё достаточно просто: в том случае, если выписка очень плохая, а именно: в ней много непонятных приходов, которые отличаются от зп или другого заявленного дохода, расходы превышают доходы или просто полный хаос. ❓Почему в таком случае лучше показать баланс? ✔️А потому что даже если вы получите отказ по той статье, что они мол не

👍1712🕊3

31 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,340 views64 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @bponlinePhoto

Ты в аэропорту. Какой-то рандомный чел на границе.

😁26🤣21💯11😢4💩1🕊1

30 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC≈3,090 views37 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ценим каждый отзыв и ваше доверие!

custom 5429107651650813515189🔥4🕊3👎2💋1

29 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC≈3,150 views50 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Статистика отказов первого квартала 2026 г. по обычным Визит Визам в Британию для граждан разных стран. Так вам скажу, что кажется, что 7% для граждан России — это много, но по факту это мало в сравнении с прошлыми годами, где процент отказов доходил до 23… Данные по второму кварталу будут скоро..

🔥3412🕊2👍1😢1

29 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC≈2,940 views60 reactionsread 29 August 2026

В связи с новостями, не остаётся ничего более, чем продолжать приглашать вас в: ✅в: МАХ / ВК

👎357😱6🤣4👍3🤬2💔1💩1

21 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC≈4,150 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Друзья, не забываем, что частный случай одного человека — это НЕ статистика. К сожалению, они часто отказывают людям, которые подают только баланс и справку с работы. С такой формулировкой, что они не видят поступлений зп и расходов человека. А значит не верят, что заявленная ЗП реальна. Да, могут выдать, если повезёт и без нормального движения. Но это частности.. ❗️Мы даже можем вам посоветовать в некоторых случая

16🔥9🤝5🕊1

12 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC≈5,080 views41 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Топ 1⃣ошибка при подаче на обычную визит визу в Британию: Вы закидываете себе денег на основной счёт прямо перед подачей. И такую выписку с движениями прикладываете к документам. Знаете, как воспринимают это визовые офицеры? ❗️Что вы заняли, отмыли, украли, и тп. деньги и положили на счёт для визы. То есть у вас может быть до этого идеальная история с поступлениями зарплаты, но этим переводом перед подачей вы испо

21💯10🤔6🙏3🕊1

8 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC≈4,630 views22 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, лайфхак. Если ваши посадочные были в apple wallet, то их можно найти в истёкших карточках.

👍18🔥21🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @londonvisa_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Виза из дома
@viza_iz_doma · 47,218
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 August 2026
Визовый центр Без границ
@vizoviy_bezgranic · 51,636
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
Визовый
@vizoviy · 26,818
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
Виза в США (gofortravel.ru)
@gofortravel_us · 22,003
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 September 2026
МАРИ ВОЯЖ | ПУТЕШЕСТВИЯ
@mariv0yage · 25,492
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
A&K: Виза в США 🇺🇸
@ak_usa_visa · 32,319
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЛондонВиза. Правила и визы.” (@londonvisa_ru), 10,267 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/londonvisa_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.