Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
итоги лолохча
@lolohchdoesresults
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003972706094 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lolohchdoesresults |
| Description | ну тут от интерактивов все кидаю, да |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 25 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lolohchdoesresults |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 1 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 184.2%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.8
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (25 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 71
- Links
- 12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
@d1xpiii Оформление красивое, белое. Мне нравится инцест ан.ме. Материал пиздатый, юзабельный. И ваще все круто
@m0tthh Я очень люблю твой тгк. Оформление прям красивое, приятно глазу. С материалом все так же. Зарисовки пишешь очень интересные, легко читаются
@sock_nightmare Оформление крутое, как постов, так и баннеров (колор да). Материал тоже пиздатый, юзабельный. Видео очень красивые, мне нравятся
@hhristinaasas67 Канал прекрасный. Колор очень красивый, сочетается с реакциями. Материал тоже годный, юзабельный. Мне очень понравились эмодзи с дед блонд, так же если был бы премиум, пользовалась бы
@lixslay228 Колор на постах пиздатый. Оформление постов так же оч красивое, все понятно и ничего лишнего. Материал юзабельный, последние эмодзи с лифарем я бы везде использовала (был бы премиум). Связки тоже очень качественные делаешь, мне нравятся
@inversia4 Оформления постов почти нету, аватарка красивая, мне нравится. Рисунки тоже красивые, удачи в развитии канала, больше сказать ничего не могу
@svataya_gaww Ахуенный канал. Оформление красивое, приятно глазу. По материалу могу сказать следующее: фотосеты просто прекрасные. Очень хорошее качество фото, мне прям нравится.
@levvvdi Недавно стали мью, да и сам канал открылся не особо давно. Оформление красивое, видео тоже. Хочу посоветовать удалять такие сообщения (как на скриншотах сверху). Потому что они, как по мне, делают канал "грязным". Выбивается кароче из общей темы. Так же по поводу стикеров. Я думаю, что в стикерпаках лучше брать нарезки не с одного стрима, а с видео всяких, или тик токов. Ну это чтобы стикеры были более юзаб…
@sliiimeyu Чб колор красивый, мне нравитсч. Оформление постов ахуенное, как и материал. Особенно мне понравились стикеры с фп, красивые и юзабельные
@mika1risxx Оформление оч красивое, материал тоже. Мне очен нравятся хедканоны и боты. С ботами не ролю, только сюжеты читаю. Сюжеты интересные, наверное, ролить с ними тоже интересно
@MC_FRIK Фриковая мая любимка. Канал пиздатый, оформление синие тебе подходит. Материал так де очень крутой. Не знаю, как ты так много стикеров сделала, восхищаюсь.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lolohchdoesresults. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@hhristinaasas67 · 1422 postsгрøб гликодиň ㋠
@coffinglikodin · 2481 post𝘥1𝘹𝘱𝘪𝘪𝘪︎︎ 𝘇 𐰁ʰʸᵖᵉ
@d1xpiii · 441 postИнверсия без таланта💛ᵉᵇˡ
@inversia4 · 711 postч#с|кремочка|🍪
@kremo4444ka · 1371 postᴧиᴩичᴇᴄᴋ@я ᴧ϶ʙʙди/рест
@levvvdi · 521 postlix lyrik⁶⁶
@lixslay228 · 521 postׁ ॒ ִ ˖ 🌭𐌌๏ᚳь
@m0tthh · 701 postmązīľļøŵŵķãôffç°²·⁴⁰⁴
@mazillowwka13 · 821 postмнения ll 𐌼ꤍ ϕрꤣӄ꤀ꤐꤌꤎ⁴⁰⁴ 𖥔
@MC_FRIK · 1211 postмика микалри
@mika1risxx · 421 postʂłiмἔẏὗ // #fuck
@sliiimeyu · 361 postЗакрыто нахуц | Социофоб #𝚈𝚏𝚜
@sociofbb · 411 post⊹𝑁𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑘⊹
@sock_nightmare · 211 postçвяť1äя гãVV
@svataya_gaww · 721 post𝘹𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘯. . .🖤
@xevelin777 · 1341 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“итоги лолохча” (@lolohchdoesresults), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lolohchdoesresults.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.