Channel
@loh_e_sepid
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,082subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001070424489 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @loh_e_sepid |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/loh_e_sepid |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 2,082 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 2,087 | +8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 2,079 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:40 | 2,082 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 2,081 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 2,081 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 March 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 591 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
140 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 128 | 91.4% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 5.00% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.43% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.43% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.714% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بعضی زخمها خوب نمیشوند، نه چون عمیقاند، بلکه چون هر روز از نگاه کردن به آنها میگریزیم. آنچه دیده نشود، تنها در تاریکیِ جان پنهان میشود؛ نه اینکه درمان شود. رنج، دشمنِ انسان نیست؛ نگهبانِ دری است که حقیقت پشت آن ایستاده است. درد از ما چیز زیادی نمیخواهد؛ فقط میخواهد انکارش نکنیم، کنارش بنشینیم، به صدایش گوش بسپاریم، و بگذاریم قصهاش را برایمان بگوید. روزی که از گریختن دست برداری، خواهی دید همان زخمی که گما…
💯2❤1
مراجعان گرامی کلینیک روانشناسی لوح سپید | خانه روایت شما 🌿 سلام و احترام برای اینکه در صورت بروز شرایط پیشبینینشده و اختلال در اینترنت، روند درمان شما تا حد امکان بدون وقفه ادامه پیدا کند، لطفاً موارد زیر را در نظر داشته باشید: 🟢 در صورت فعال بودن اینترنت ملی: جلسات آنلاین شما از طریق اسکایروم یا پیامرسان بله بهصورت تصویری برگزار خواهد شد. 💻 برای ورود به اسکایروم نیازی به نصب هیچ نرمافزاری نیست؛ کافی است د…
امنیت، یکی از اساسیترین نیازهای روح ماست. یعنی روح انسان نباید زیر فشار دائمی ترس و وحشت خرد شود؛ مگر در لحظاتی نادر و کوتاه، آن هم بر اثر تفکری گذرا دربارهی اوضاع. ترس و وحشت، هرچند گاهی با ما آشنا به نظر میرسند، در حقیقت زهرهایی کشندهاند. چه از ترس بیکاری باشد، چه از آزار پلیس، چه از حضور فاتحی بیگانه، یا حملهای قریبالوقوع؛ هر مصیبتی که طاقت آدمی را طاق کند. @loh_e_sepid رومیان باستان برای به بند کشیدن روح ب…
❤9
خشونت فیزیکی علیه زنان؛ روایتی که باید بازنویسی شود خشونت فیزیکی، تنها یک رفتار نیست؛ روایت قدرت، کنترل و نابرابری است که در طول زمان ساخته و بازتولید میشود. در روایتدرمانی، به جای تمرکز بر مشکل، به انسان و روایت زندگی او توجه میکنیم. خشونت، هرگز تقصیر شما نیست. شما قدرت بازنویسی داستان زندگیتان را دارید. خشونت فیزیکی میتواند شامل: ضرب و شتم، هل دادن یا آسیب رساندن استفاده از ابزار یا تهدید به آسیب محدود کرد…
❤12
امنیت، یک مکان نیست؛ یک احساس درونی است. «من هیچجا احساس امنیت نمیکنم…» این یکی از جملههایی است که بارها در اتاق درمان شنیده میشود. بسیاری از افراد تصور میکنند اگر رابطه، شغل یا شهرشان تغییر کند، بالاخره احساس امنیت خواهند کرد. اما گاهی مسئله، بیرون از ما نیست. در نظریه دلبستگی، احساس ناامنی میتواند ریشه در تجربههای اولیه زندگی داشته باشد؛ زمانی که ذهن یاد گرفته دنیا همیشه قابل پیشبینی، امن یا پاسخگو نیست.…
❤12
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
نیاز به درک شدن به این معنی نیست که شما محتاج دیگران هستید، بلکه به این معنی است که شما یک آدم عادی هستید با ویژگیهای خاص خودتان و با نیازهایی مانند همهی آدمها. 🌟👤✨ @loh_e_sepid @lohesepidadmin
❤11
باید پیوسته تاثیر زمان و متغیربودن چیزها را در نظر داشت و از این رو در هر موقعیتی بلافاصله عکس آن را به تصویر آورد: یعنی در سعادت، شوربختی را. در دوستی، دشمنی را. در روزهای آفتابی، روزهای ابری را. در عشق، نفرت را. در اعتماد و درمیانگذاشتن راز خود با دیگری خیانت و پشیمانی را و بر عکس. این رفتار، سرچشمه ماندگار فرزانگی واقعی در زندگی خواهد بود که موجب میشود، همواره سنجیده عمل کنیم و به آسانی گمراه نشویم. • آرتور…
❤9👍2
برای شرکت در این کارگاه تخصصی لطفا در واتساپ یا بله پیام دهید 09105244709 شروع دوره: از همین پنجشنبه🌸 ظرفیت باقی مانده: محدود
❤5
گاهی لازم نیست جواب همه سؤالها را داشته باشی. بعضی آدمها با این تصور به اتاق درمان میآیند که باید از قبل بدانند دقیقاً چه مشکلی دارند، چرا اینقدر خستهاند یا از کجا باید شروع کنند. اما اغلب آنچه ما را به درمان میرساند، پاسخها نیستند؛ سؤالهایی هستند که مدتها بیپاسخ ماندهاند. احساسی که نمیتوانیم نامش را پیدا کنیم، رابطهای که چیزی در آن آزارمان میدهد، یا خستگیای که دلیلش را نمیدانیم. درمان قرار نیست ج…
❤11👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @loh_e_sepid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
حال و هواتون چقدر نوروزی و بهاری هست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 302,381 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کلینیک روانشناسی لوح سپید” (@loh_e_sepid), 2,082 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loh_e_sepid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.