Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دَانَةُ الأَدَبِ

Channel

دَانَةُ الأَدَبِ

@logeena4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,284subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001494401079
TypeChannel
Username@logeena4
CreatedBetween 1 September 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/logeena4

Growth

4,2664,2894,277.56 August 2026 — 4,270 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,270 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,272 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,266 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,278 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,289 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,287 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,285 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,284 subscribers4,2846 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 24 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,263–4,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 19:554,284-1
27 Aug 2026, 11:244,285-2
24 Aug 2026, 05:354,287-2
20 Aug 2026, 02:364,289+11
16 Aug 2026, 16:234,278+12
13 Aug 2026, 02:144,266-6
10 Aug 2026, 12:174,272+2
7 Aug 2026, 03:134,270no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:154,270first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.48%
avg views ÷ 4,284 subscribers
Avg views / post
235
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held27 (2 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total6,337
Reactions total251
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

251 reactions across 27 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6124.3%
🤣3413.5%
🥰2610.4%
💔207.97%
💯135.18%
🕊135.18%
👌114.38%
😢114.38%
👍103.98%
🤔93.59%
🤝83.19%
72.79%
😭72.79%
🙈72.79%
🍓51.99%
👀31.20%
😁31.20%
😇10.398%
😐10.398%
🙏10.398%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC24 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

أما الراسخون في المبادئ فلا تغيرهم الطوارئ، ومن كانت الفضيلة فيهم أصلٌ وديدنٌ فلن تجتثها أي طوارق.. يقال: "فلان غيّره المنصب"! والأصح أنه أظهره على حقيقته، فالأصلاء الذين تجذّرت فيهم الثوابت وبلغت منهم مبلغا لا يتغيرون بتغير الحال، أما المذبذبون فهم عرضة للتقلّب.. بعض الناس حقائق مغيّبة ومؤجلة ستكتشفها يوما ما بتغير الظروف فقط!

1💯1🥰1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

8 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC54 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

‏من أدب المحبين إخراج أخطاء المحبوب مخرج النسيان، حتى لا تنكسر نفسه، ولا ينثلم قلبه، وحتى يكون باب العود مفتوحا. ‏وبهذا ينقاد لي العدول عن "فعصى" إلى "فنسي" في قوله تعالى: "ولقد عهدنا إلى آدم من قبل فنسي ولم نجد له عزما". ‏والعدول عن الأصل يُبحث له عن نكتة.. ومن أدب المحبين عدم مكافحة المحبوب بما يكره، واجتناب مصادمته بما يعاف، والاحتيال لذلك ما أمكن. ‏وبهذا أفهم السكوت عن حال داود - عليه السلام - في مقام البيان

💯2🤣2🍓1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

8 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قل اللهم فاطر السموات والارض عالم الغيب والشهادة انت تحكم بين عبادك فيما كانوا فيه يختلفون

🕊21🥰1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

7 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC116 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“أَغَارُ عَلَيْكِ مِنْ نَظَرِ الْعُيُونِ فَكَيْفَ بِغَيْرِ ذَلِكَ مِنَ الظُّنُونِ وَأَحْسُدُ كُلَّ ذِي أَرْضٍ تَطَئِينَهَا فَلَيْتَكِ لَمْ تَطَئِي إِلَّا جُفُونِي”

🤣21🤔1🥰1😢1🙈1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

7 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC130 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“:مَرَرْتُ بِدَارِهِـمْ شَوْقاً إِلَيْهَا لَعَلِّي أَلْمَحُ الأَحْبَابَ فِيهَا فَمَا مِنْ نَائِمٍ فِي الدَّارِ يَصْحُو وَمَا مِنْ زَائِرٍ يَدْنُو إِلَيْهَا سَأَلْتُ الجَارَ: مَا الأَخْبَارُ قُلْ لِي؟ فَقَالَ: الدَّارُ أَبْقَى مِنْ ذَوِيهَا أَمَا تَعْلَمْ بِأَنَّ النَّاسَ تَمْضِي وَأَنَّ الدَّارَ تَنْعَى سَاكِنِيهَا”

🤣21💔1💯1🤔1😢1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

7 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC160 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قَالَتْ حَلِيمَةُ: كُلَّمَا جَنَّ الدُّجَى أَلْفَيْتُ وَجْهَ مُحَمَّدٍ مِصْبَاحَا وَالْيَوْمَ نُورُ الْكَوْنِ هَدْيُ مُحَمَّدٍ فِي كُلِّ نَاحِيَةٍ يَشِعُّ صَبَاحَا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ، فَمَا رَأَيْتُ مُصَلِّيًا إِلَّا وَطَابَ فُؤَادُهُ وَارْتَاحَا ﷺ اللهم في يوم الجمعة خير الأيام صل وسلم وبارك وأنعم على نبينا محمد سيد الأنام ، وبدر التمام ، ومسك الختام ...تسليما كثيرا.

2🍓1👌1🕊1🥰1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

6 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC182 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Shazarat100

أيا بعيدا وقد قُربت من قلبي وٱلناس تأگلني عدلا وإيلاما قالواْ جِننت إذا ٱحببت مبتعدا أِجيبُ أعشقه لو گان أوهاما ٱحيا بقربگ يا من لستُ المسه ٱلإ بحلمٍ وقد بُليتُ ٱحلامَا أنا وأنتِ متىٰ ٱلإيامُ تجمعنا ٱني گبرتُ بهذا ٱلبعدِ أعواما

2🤣2🕊1🤔1🥰1🙈1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

6 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC221 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قد يكون جوهر غيرك أغلى من كل ما تملك .

2🤣2🍓1👌1💯1🥰1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

6 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC227 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

لا تهونُ مشاقُّ الدنيا إلا على قلبٍ أحبّ، ولا يتعبُ من سارَ ورفيقُه شوقُه فلا يستقيمُ العيشُ في وعثاءِ الأيام إلا بمن نحب، ولا يشعرُ المحبُّ بطولِ الطريقِ ما دام الحنينُ يحملُه وما طابَ للإنسانِ عُمرٌ بلا حُبّ يسنده، ولا شكَت قدمٌ من المسيرِ وقلبُها يطيرُ شوقًا إلى من يحب فالحبُّ هو الزادُ في سفرِ الحياةِ الطويل، فمن أحبّ بصدقٍ قطَعَ البُعدَ بخطوةٍ واحدة! محمد الفقي

3🤣21🍓1👍1🤝1🥰1🙈1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

6 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC231 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

صباح الخير يا دانة من الصعب أن تعيد ترتيب إنسانٍ في قلبك بعد أن بعثره موقفٌ واحد. فالقلب لا ينسى من أوجعه في زمنٍ ظنّه فيه أمانًا. فأصعب ما في الخذلان أنه لا يمحي الشخص بل يمحي مكانته. يظل موجودًا، لكن في آخر الصفوف، حيث لا يليق به القرب فليس كل من أخطأ نستطيع أن نسامحه ونعيده كما كان فهناك مواقف تخلع الإنسان من مكانه في القلب، وحين تخلعه يصعب أن يجد مقاسه مرة أخرى لأن المواقف مرايا ترينا الناس على حقيقتهم. ومن رأي

4🤝2🤣21💔1🤔1🥰1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

5 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC228 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

أدركت أن الإفراط في التفّهّم قد يأتي بثمن. كلما سمحت دون حدود، وتفهّمت كل شيء، وتنازلت في كل مرة اعتاد بعض الناس على تجاهل مشاعرك. ليس لأنك طيب بل لأنهم ظنوا أن طيبتك تعني أنك ستتحمل دائمًا. التعاطف لا يكتمل إلا بوجود حدود صحية. فالعطاء الذي لا تحميه الحدود قد يتحول مع الوقت إلى استنزاف. كن متفهمًا لكن لا تجعل تفهُمك سببًا في إهمال نفسك وضياع كرامتك.

3👍3🤣21👌1💔1🥰1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

5 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC223 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اللهم عوّضني في الموضع الذي انكسر فيه قلبي، عوضًا يُنسيني مرارة الفقد، وامنحني من خيرك ما يفوق أمنياتي، وأجزل عليّ بعطاياك ونِعمك حتى أعلم أن تأخيرك كان عين الرحمة.. آمين يارب .

4🤣2👌1👍1💯1🕊1🥰1😢1

Signed د.محمد الفقي

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @logeena4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 288,008 of 1,629,372entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بَليغٌ
@balighoun9 · 89,140
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
((صِبْغَةَ اللَّهِ ً ))
@algwere · 42,130
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دَانَةُ الأَدَبِ” (@logeena4), 4,284 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/logeena4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.