Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Локус

Channel

Локус

@locus_vocis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,824subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001419516917
TypeChannel
Username@locus_vocis
Created10 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/locus_vocis

Growth

1,8241,8341,8296 August 2026 — 1,834 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,833 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,830 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,824 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,823–1,836 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 09:071,824-2
13 Aug 2026, 00:531,826-4
9 Aug 2026, 17:211,830-3
7 Aug 2026, 02:471,833-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:331,834first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 1,824 subscribers
Avg views / post
308
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held16 (2 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total615
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9254.4%
🔥4023.7%
👍105.92%
💯52.96%
🤩52.96%
31.78%
💘31.78%
😁31.78%
21.18%
🤯21.18%
❤‍🔥10.592%
👎10.592%
💅10.592%
🥰10.592%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC348 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А еще можно будет урвать книжечек от самого крупного и мейнстримного маргинального и нишевого издательства страны. 1. Брене Ж.-Б. Что значит мыслить? Арабо-латинский ответ 2. Гройс Б. Александр Кожев 3. Бовуар С. Старость 4. Хуэй Ю. Пост-Европа 5. Джеймисон Ф. Годы теории. Французская мысль с послевоенного времени до наших дней И букинист Смены подготовил что то интересное

6😁3👍2👎1

30 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC267 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kznphilPhoto

31 июля – 2 августа, в парке «Черное озеро» состоится фестиваль «По краям», который проводят Смена и Ad marginem. В программе несколько философских лекций наших коллег: - 31 июля, 18:00 лекция Игоря Агапова «Эссе об экзотизме: Другой в путешествиях начала XX века и сегодня» - 1 августа, 13:00 Лилия Фахретдинова презентует книгу Тавады Еко «Где начинается Европа» - 1 августа, 16:00 лекция Игоря Кобылина «Наука упра

2 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC689 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kznphilPhoto

Вы ждали и даждались! Публикуем полное расписание Школы! Вот ссылка на онлайн-подключение. Если хотите прийти на лекции в университет, обязательно напишите, оформим. Хотите на лекции в Смену, регистрируйтесь (для студентов ИСФНиМК есть промокод) Если хотите на лекции в Ща, приходите. Расписание в карточках ниже

🔥51

29 Jun 2026, 11:53 UTC653 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ugolkazanPhoto

уже подготовились к сегодняшнему вечеру? напоминаем о возможности посетить лекцию философа, Игоря Агапова, которая состоится уже в 19:00 по адресу ул. Парижской Коммуны, 25/39 29 июня // 19:00 // искать себя — может, не стоит? философы о критике подлинности — забрать место о других событиях и новых наборах на актерские курсы следите на сайте ugolkazan.ru

🔥72👍2

29 Jun 2026, 11:53 UTC598 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Конечно не стоит. Но на лекцию сходите

💯51👍1

26 Jun 2026, 09:39 UTC635 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nopublicsociologyPhoto

«Покер и чумазые дети. Теория общего знания» — новая встреча в новой локации! ♦️ в ближайший четверг кандидат философских наук Михаил Хорт, участию которого мы безмерно рады, расскажет про общее знание — ситуации, когда информация не просто известна каждому, но каждый знает, что она известна каждому, и так до бесконечности В социологии и экономике различие между "все знают" и "все знают, что все знают" позволяет об

12🤩5👍1

25 Jun 2026, 08:10 UTC560 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @imaginative_philosophy

Ссылка на онлайн трансляцию: https://youtu.be/mPpDckdc-DA

1👍1💘1

24 Jun 2026, 18:50 UTC573 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @imaginative_philosophy

❗️В программе произошли небольшие изменения! 11:00 - Начало. Вступительное слово организаторов. 11:20 - Егор Дорожкин «Неадекватная реальность: имагинативизм и двойная ловушка воображения». 11:50 - Антон Заньковский «Спекулятивный субъект имагинативного Абсолюта». 12:20 - Александр Ветушинский «Материалистическая теория воображения». 12:50 - перерыв (10 минут). 13:00 - Богдан Громов «Вопрос о бессмертии в ф

🔥63

24 Jun 2026, 18:50 UTC512 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сажусь в поезд и думаю, что до появление интернета жд сообщение долго было главной метафорой всего. Воображаемые техники, ю-ноу. Голова - перекресток железных дорог. Нижний, приходите завтра послушать умных людей. Я тоже приду

9

20 Jun 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,000 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Три дня назад мне исполнилось 33 года. Так совпало, что в этом академическом году я особенно много вычитывал чужих диссертаций, курсовых, статей и прочих академических текстов. И так совпало, что большинство из них были хорошие. Актуалочку я теперь собираю и чувствую не через социальные сети или книжки или видосики, но через чужие черновики диссертаций и заметочки для курсовых. И есть как будто бы устойчивый мотив "

25🔥5👍3

14 Jun 2026, 16:44 UTC759 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dark_blogosPhoto

Мы с Дмитрием Кравченко через 2 недели проведем первую из 9 запланированных лекций по киноиндустрии. Не по киноискусству, от которого мы (я) устали, а конкретно, че там по деньгам, кто главный и как все устроено. Дмитрий - профессиональный сценарист (сериал Шеф, 7,4 на Кинопоиске), который расскажет правду-матку. Я - софист, задача которого докопаться до Дмитрия. 25 июня в 16:00 в ИНИОН РАН #киногик_извращенец

🔥532

14 Jun 2026, 16:44 UTC715 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Первое правило философов миллениалов - всем рассказывать про "Бойцовский клуб"

4🔥42

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @locus_vocis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 551,211 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Локус” (@locus_vocis), 1,824 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/locus_vocis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.