Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 好評專區

Channel

好評專區

@lock55888

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

432subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001602034769
TypeChannel
Username@lock55888
CreatedBetween 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lock55888

Growth

4224324277 August 2026 — 422 subscribers8 August 2026 — 422 subscribers16 August 2026 — 427 subscribers24 August 2026 — 432 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 421–434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 16:47432+5
16 Aug 2026, 17:04427+5
8 Aug 2026, 05:31422no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:53422first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 432 subscribers
Avg views / post
66.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held14 (27 January 20263 August 2026)
Views total66
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👍真空姐 VIP客人認證 🌟 加入我們的專屬頻道,讓您在追求幸福的路上不再孤單! 🚀 快速加入通道: https://t.me/addlist/rh78rjUgl7syZTY1 💬 多管道預約,貼心為您服務: Discord:fua104 WhatsApp:+66 923 681 563 WeChat:mandy59888 SKY:lady6501 Gleezy:lock55888 Telegram:@s14188 📅 各區班表查詢: 台北: https://c.gleezy.top/mQLKqFGz 新竹: https://c.gleezy.top/3Ql0utME 台中: https://c.gleezy.top/3O9kiGQJ 高雄: https://c.gleezy.top/3aQWS5i0 台南: https://c.gleezy.top/LaEwR662 熟女人妻專區:https://c.gleezy.to

6 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC189 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mandy598Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

24 Jun 2026, 05:19 UTC358 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

10000 璐娜156.E.21 🟢舌吻/共浴/無套吹/親胸 🟢角色扮演/情趣用品/69 ⏩無套內+3000 #台北外送茶

18 May 2026, 11:01 UTC518 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

美妍 158cm/F+cup/46kg-21歲 10000 清冷公主系巨乳正妹 氣質超讚 #台北外送茶

1

28 Mar 2026, 13:18 UTC523 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mandy598Photo

阿寧 162cm 45kg Ccup 23歲 清純氣質 鄰家甜甜の外型 讓你重溫情竇初開的初戀FU 性經驗少含苞待放需調教 床上乖巧好配合

2

15 Mar 2026, 13:13 UTC634 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#台南外送茶 ★LINE:cc886623 ★Telegram:s14188 ★Gleezy:lock55888 ★Wechat:mandy59888 ★WhatsApp:66923681563 ★skype:lady6501 ★點擊網址直接約茶:https://chat.gleezy.org/?inviteCode=3nyd65 ★台北班表:https://c.gleezy.top/mQLKqFGz ★新竹班表:https://c.gleezy.top/3Ql0utME ★台中班表:https://c.gleezy.top/3O9kiGQJ ★高雄班表:https://c.gleezy.top/3aQWS5i0 ★台南班表:https://c.gleezy.top/LaEwR662 ★Mandyの論壇:https://happy104.com ★Mandyの頻道:https://t.me/mandy598 ★情色の分享:htt

5 Mar 2026, 10:32 UTC477 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#台南外送茶 里歐 3000 162 B 30歲 輕熟 重服務

11 Feb 2026, 04:12 UTC648 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#台中外送茶 18000 係花出來兼職 高顔值 清純白嫩 身材不錯的 162 D 20歲 LINE:cc886623 Telegram:@s14188 Gleezy:lock55888 Wechat:mandy59888 WhatsApp:66923681563 skype:lady6501 #台中外送茶 點擊網址直接約茶:https://chat.gleezy.org/?inviteCode=3nyd65 台北班表:https://c.gleezy.top/mQLKqFGz 新竹班表:https://c.gleezy.top/3Ql0utME 台中班表:https://c.gleezy.top/3O9kiGQJ 彰化班表:https://c.gleezy.top/ACK9mrfV 高雄班表:https://c.gleezy.top/3aQWS5i0 台南班表:https://c.gleezy.top/LaEwR662 ➡️

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lock55888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“好評專區” (@lock55888), 432 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lock55888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.