The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
LOBO | Base chain calls
@lobocallsbase
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001889544429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lobocallsbase |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 6 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lobocallsbase |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 6 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 7 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 00s
- Average length
- 1m 00s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
57 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 34 | 59.6% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 19.3% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 12.3% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 5.26% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.75% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2023 to 15 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
120k, x2 💥 from the call now, community growing very fast and man, the memes are so crazy funny. There is not another project like this on Base. 🥇
🔥4👍1
bat420i launched a few hours a go. Following the narrative and branding same than eth mooners but with Brian as a protagonist. Very nice website and branding. It could do well. 100% degen. DYOR 💻 Website: https://www.bat420i.com/ 📊 Chart: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/base/pair-explorer/0xa2cd05de0b86d564c4c9021e9553523a9d36f352 👥 Tg: https://t.me/Bat420i ✖️Twitter: https://twitter.com/Bat420i ✅ Renounced: yes …
👍2🔥2
CMC LISTING SOON LFG
DOXXED DEV. BULLISH 🔥
Meet the dev of FukuToshi!
Fukutoshi is the first project on Base that reward holders with Eth pulled from the 4% taxes. The team looks very profesional. 2 days old project and holding the chart very well. Nice community. Now in a small correction after ATH, could be a good entry. DYOR 💻 Website: https://www.thefukutoshi.com/ 📊 Chart: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/base/pair-explorer/0x076e4782e031c44a6babbb39284bb2399085d24e 👥 Tg:https://…
🔥2👍1
Faith is an interesting meme project. The art is on another level. Check the website. The project is only 3 days old. Now is sitting on a strong 350k floor, and the chart is pointing to reverse the correction very soon. Aped. CMC and Bitmart listings could happen any moment now, probably today. Very bullish news. The team also mention that utilities are coming, maybe a swap for Base. Solid community. DYOR 💻 Website:…
👍2🔥2👏1
🔥 BULLISH NEWS FOR BASE CHAIN🔥 https://twitter.com/Uniswap/status/1688581784609435648?s=20
🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lobocallsbase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@lobocallsbase named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LOBO | Base chain calls” (@lobocallsbase), 6 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lobocallsbase.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.