Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑺𝒂𝒍𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒆

Channel

𝑺𝒂𝒍𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒆

@lnsalvAt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002593228551
TypeChannel
Username@lnsalvAt
DescriptionAre you mine?
Created29 May 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lnsalvAt

Growth

111 August 2026 — 1 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1 subscribers11 August 202614 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:171no change
11 Aug 2026, 02:451first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 29 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋440.0%
custom 5339384809879793453330.0%
custom 5255965622889632241220.0%
custom 5253541929894831856110.0%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2025 to 8 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2025, 14:31 UTC11 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @restovskiePhoto

`Ты же помнишь, как слова насквозь проткнули сердце и прошли сквозь века, беспощадно уничтожая всё живое в тебе? Я помню, как ты с ужасом смотрел в мои глаза и искал в них вечность, совсем не замечая, что она стояла позади, тихо выжидая своего часа. И этот момент настал, теперь, засыпая каждую ночь, ты смотришь в окно и вспоминаешь меня. Когда-нибудь, в одну из таких ночей, обезжизненное тело будет найдено. Ты о

8 Jul 2025, 14:31 UTC13 viewsread 14 August 2026

Новый канал, решила на этом остановиться.

4 Jun 2025, 19:42 UTC68 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Всех приветствую и прошу прощения за долгое отсутствие.

💋2custom 52559656228896322412custom 53393848098797934532

31 May 2025, 19:28 UTC68 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Ты же девочка-палач Ну же, девочка, не плачь.

custom 52535419298948318561

30 May 2025, 18:05 UTC68 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Зависай, я-я, зависай моя Сломленная моя, больная дама.

💋1custom 53393848098797934531

29 May 2025, 18:54 UTC130 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

И если б даже небеса мне дали ещё шанс, Я б снова побежал наверх, по этажам.

💋1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @lnsalvAt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 713,480 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑺𝒂𝒍𝒗𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒆” (@lnsalvAt), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lnsalvAt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.