That AI caught the exact bottom before the massive pump. Held the buy right through the chop and locked in the profit perfectly on the way up. Absolutely insane precision Luke

Channel
LMB: Trader Reviews
@lmbreviews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
2,121subscribers
+493 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003064258829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lmbreviews |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lmbreviews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 2,121 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 2,119 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 2,135 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 2,137 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 2,146 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 2,148 | +506 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 1,642 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 1,634 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 1,629 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 1,628 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 1,628 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.5%
- avg views ÷ 2,121 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 435
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.219%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (31 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,219 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
way the AI managed this long position is unbelievable. It rode the entire bullish wave and executed the exit exactly at the peak resistance. Taking all the human emotion out of holding a trade is a total game changer
You’re wasting your time reading reviews of other men and women making money. It’s like p*rn – quick validation instead of putting in the work to get a “10”. All these screenshots – could’ve been yours. But instead of just trying 1-2 signals in VIP – you searching for a proof “why you shouldn’t enter”.
First trade in the VIP. Was a bit hesitant to hold for all 4 targets so I secured profit early. Seeing the accuracy gives me way more confidence for the next ones. Thanks!
Been running the AI for a while now and the execution is still flawless. It closed all targets perfectly today while I was away, thanks for every profit Luke 🤝
I don’t usually post such reviews, cause they look a bit cheesy. But this one from Noah speaks loader, than plain profits. I appreciate every hard working man trying to provide better life for their families. Even if it’s something as simple as gifting new phone to the wife. When you make solid profits on trading – don’t forget those, who backed you up along the way.
That Gold setup in the VIP was crazy fast today. Smashed TP4 straight to the target without any pullback. Appreciate the solid alert👌
Could have texted me in the morning and already collected first hundred bucks with us. But you still think Luke Bridges signals doesn’t work… Or any other objection you have… People just copy paste TP’s into their MT5 accounts and enter trades when I text “enter”. Then “magically” see profits in their “History” tab. What can be simpler than that?
What can be better than starting a day with quick $500 profit? If you want your review/trading result to be featured in my channel and in Reviews channel too – make sure you send me screenshots of your MT5 with a short message about your experience in VIP: @LukeBridgesTrading
Just took the BTC setup from the vip crypto channel and it smashed TP2 effortlessly. The precision on these crypto signals is unmatched Luke. Best decision I made for my portfolio
My VIP members don't even react to profits anymore… That's what a 91% win rate does to a room. At first everyone's in shock. They come from other signal groups where a good day was one, maybe two short scalp trades – and half of them lost 🥀 Then they get inside my VIP gold channel and see 3 to 6 signals a day, hitting at 91%. Winner after winner after winner. New guys are stunned. Screenshotting every TP, messagin…
I have to admit I was skeptical before joining the VIP because there are so many scams out there. But what you provide is on a completely different level Luke. It is not just about copying trades blindly. Your detailed chart breakdowns and the logic behind every single entry have taught me more about market structure than months of watching tutorials. Balancing a full time job makes it hard to stare at charts all day…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lmbreviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LMB: Trader Reviews” (@lmbreviews), 2,121 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lmbreviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.