Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✧˚Death Rona' ♡¸.

Channel

✧˚Death Rona' ♡¸.

@lloveMandarinAaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

305subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001846721741
TypeChannel
Username@lloveMandarinAaa
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lloveMandarinAaa

Growth

2993053027 August 2026 — 299 subscribers8 August 2026 — 299 subscribers8 August 2026 — 301 subscribers14 August 2026 — 305 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 298–306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:33305+4
8 Aug 2026, 14:32301+2
8 Aug 2026, 08:02299no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:59299first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.0%
avg views ÷ 305 subscribers
Avg views / post
165
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held11 (27 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,811
Reactions total362
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

362 reactions across 11 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53999377971444796757621.0%
custom 53033016342798844955013.8%
custom 53957790103765365734011.0%
custom 52423091687816044333810.5%
custom 5413592838208242353339.12%
💘174.70%
custom 5262574946197980423154.14%
custom 5316770896533281353154.14%
custom 5287325124737913951143.87%
143.87%
custom 5262721413172703797102.76%
custom 535048937910412245892.49%
custom 540889535087223225682.21%
😈82.21%
🍓61.66%
custom 524259531238776631541.10%
custom 535933440898370664230.829%
💊20.552%

Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 362reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lloveMandarinAaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC32 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я решила окончательно добить свои нервы и пойти на Пати Аками в Рине Шиои, так еще и выступить в ней хочу. С учетом того, что заявки закрываются 25 августа, а косплей я начну делать только 18-20 августа🙁 (тк сейчас я в больнице) ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #щитпост

5

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

7 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC52 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☺️ в шоке.. Вас уже 💭💭💭🤩❤️ Спасибо вам всем большое, я очень счастлива, что достигла такой цифры, для меня это правда очень много значит. Спасибо вам большое, что вы со мной.❤️ 🤍🎀🤍🤍🎀🤍🤍🎀🤍🤍🎀

custom 541359283820824235312custom 52873251247379139515custom 524259531238776631541

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

3 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC120 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня ходила в парк аттракционов🎀 Впервые за все свои 17 лет я полноценно посетила парк и прокатилась на всех аттракционах. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 (Кроме американской горки, на ней было много народу, нам сказали, что пришлось бы ждать 2 часа)😭 Мне особенно понравился аттракцион "360" после него я вообще перестала чего либо бояться🤩🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #щитпост

custom 541359283820824235317custom 52873251247379139519custom 52627214131727037977custom 53593344089837066422🍓1

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

2 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC138 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀Думаю под конец августа у меня будет готов косплей на Рину Шиои из "Сайт девочек волшебниц" Уже заказала ткань и материал для крафта ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #спойлер

💘127custom 54135928382082423534custom 52627214131727037973custom 53593344089837066421

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

31 Jul 2026, 21:24 UTC126 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо большое за звёздочку🌟

custom 539993779714447967513custom 52423091687816044336💘5custom 53957790103765365731

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

31 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC127 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Решила попробовать оформить пост в своем старом стиле, как вам? 🌟

custom 539993779714447967512custom 52423091687816044336custom 53033016342798844956

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

31 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC657 views62 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

➿➿🔤🅰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🎪 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𝑰 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒌 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒆𝒚𝒆𝒔 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒎𝒆, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒃𝒆 𝒔𝒐 𝒄𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑰 𝒄𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒆, 𝒅𝒊𝒅𝒏'𝒕 𝑰? ꒷꒦︶꒷꒦︶ ๋ ࣭ ⭑꒷꒦ ꒷꒦︶꒷꒦︶ ๋ ࣭ ⭑꒷꒦ ꒷꒦︶꒷ ☺️ᴀᴋ жᴀᴧь, чᴛо у ᴛᴇбя нᴇᴛ ᴦоᴧоᴄᴀ, 🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🌟 🤍🤍🤍➿Тгк-Rona❗️❗️➿🤍🤍🤍 #Harlequin #TheFreakCircus #cosplay #пост

custom 539577901037653657327custom 524230916878160443318custom 539993779714447967516🍓1

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

30 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC138 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤩➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #TheFreakCircus

custom 539993779714447967521custom 539577901037653657312😈8custom 53033016342798844952

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

28 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC165 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🎪🎪➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #TheFreakCircus

custom 530330163427988449522custom 539993779714447967514custom 52625749461979804238🍓2💊2custom 52423091687816044332

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

27 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC138 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩 #TheFreakCircus

custom 530330163427988449520custom 52625749461979804237custom 524230916878160443361🍓1

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

27 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC118 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @llxolzPhoto

⠀⠀⠀⠀𝐴𝑚𝑒-𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛⠀⠀⠀⠀@llxolz⠀ ⠀⠀🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ⠀ @lloveMandarinAaa⠀⠀𝐾𝐴𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑙 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ~《 Photograph 》~ 🤩🤩その場限りの満足感を与え続けて……私の心の空虚さを埋めて…… 💘 ⠀🌟🌟🌟🌟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🌟🌟🌟🌟 ⠀🌟やっほー、みんな!ネットの天使、KAngelだよ!🤩🤩 ⠀⠀ #косп⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀B𑀉E𐍃𐍃!! 🙏

custom 531677089653328135315custom 53504893791041224589custom 54088953508722322568🍓1

Signed ⊹ ࣪ ˖𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐚ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @lloveMandarinAaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,247,485 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✧˚Death Rona' ♡¸.” (@lloveMandarinAaa), 305 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lloveMandarinAaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.