Channel
@liziscontent
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,660subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001807230639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liziscontent |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liziscontent |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 1,660 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 1,661 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 1,665 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 1,667 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 1,667 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 5 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
328 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5348237330182338548 | 72 | 22.0% | |
| custom 5372937476648234373 | 51 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5276462405122030792 | 33 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5328225750405374654 | 33 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5301297533820102014 | 28 | 8.54% | |
| custom 5373222147080617333 | 22 | 6.71% | |
| custom 5280573900005069775 | 16 | 4.88% | |
| custom 5350547910918432578 | 14 | 4.27% | |
| custom 5451877051403365437 | 14 | 4.27% | |
| custom 5328028018701005801 | 13 | 3.96% | |
| custom 5231130219313647176 | 12 | 3.66% | |
| custom 5334891346375238967 | 8 | 2.44% | |
| custom 5355299244259439164 | 7 | 2.13% | |
| custom 5380102362566259706 | 3 | 0.915% | |
| custom 5327939696993532727 | 2 | 0.61% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 328reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 30 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @liziscontent. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 March 2026 to 30 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я вам тут утром записала болталку и забыла про нее😀 Послушайте. Рассказала немного о том, как у меня дела🩷
custom 527646240512203079212custom 54518770514033654373custom 52805739000050697752
🪴🌟` тем временем мои клиенты запускают тренды Многие боятся быть «скопированными». Не нравится, когда берут их идеи, подачу, структуру, формулировки. Я тоже была такая: унизительно, нечестно, было ощущение, что у меня просто бездумно своровали то, во что я вкладывалась и старалась. Но сейчас у меня на этот счёт есть достаточно непопулярное мнение: если тебя копируют – ты делаешь ах-нуэнно! Ты все делаешь правильн…
custom 527646240512203079210custom 54518770514033654378custom 52311302193136471764custom 52805739000050697752
☕️📚` затянуло в контрасты Или мои наблюдения за неделю работы в офисе, спустя столько лет работы на себя онлайн. Кто пропустил: меня пригласили на должность ведущего специалиста по разработке и развитию [кое-какого] бренда в системе здравоохранения. Это не пиар-отдел, это глубокий маркетинг, аналитика и стратегия. И первое, контраст чего очень ощущается – это процессы. Я привыкла работать одна. Сама берёшь заказ/к…
custom 528057390000506977512custom 527646240512203079211custom 52311302193136471768custom 54518770514033654373
☕️📓` сегодняшний день начался с того, что Муж повез меня на работу в центр города Неожиданный поворот для того, кто больше 6 лет работает онлайн на себя, правда?😀 Но жизнь умеет дарить внезапные события, и я с благодарностью их принимаю. И знаете, это круто. Уметь конвертировать и приложить знания из привычных направлений в другой формат. Потому что это твердая система, это комплекс, внутренняя аналитическая работ…
custom 535054791091843257814custom 53482373301823385489custom 53348913463752389678custom 53279396969935327272
🎧🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 важно послушать тем, кто: • продает свои продукты, услуги • на этапе их создания • вкладывается в блог и своих клиентов, а роста не видит • продает за низкие чеки Уловите суть, о которой я говорю, и начните действовать не так, как раньше. [и немного о моем опыте обучения, и что я тоже бываю неидеальным учеником] #подкаст 📎забустить канал 📎lizis о блогинге и жизни
custom 530129753382010201412custom 53482373301823385489custom 53282257504053746547
только 1 человек из 15 продаёт успешно свой продукт Грустная статистика для остальных 14ти, правда?) И этот голос не мой. Я выбрала «на этапе создания продукта», потому что действительно нахожусь в разработке укомплектованного флагмана. Сейчас рынок как никогда нуждается в комплексном подходе во всем: в бизнесе, мышлении, в здоровье, в отношениях и т.д. Банальные примеры на блоге. Мы же понимаем, что • упаковка бл…
custom 534823733018233854814custom 532822575040537465412custom 53729374766482343737
А что по продукту?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько у меня здесь людей, которые продают свои услуги/товары?
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤩🌟` с чего все начинается, или почему вы не умеете доносить ценность своих услуг? Начнем с того, что ты классный специалист, прекрасно работаешь и любишь свое дело. Но вот только какой толк, если об этом никто, кроме тебя, не знает? Ты готов помочь всем. Ты знаешь, что справишься, дашь классный результат. Но только это все у тебя в голове. И это не переносное значение. Это реальность. Большинство из вас хранят св…
custom 537293747664823437314custom 534823733018233854811custom 53282257504053746549
🎧🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🩷Болото как вызов: мотивационный подкаст🩷 🟣обсуждаем очень интересное определение «болота» 🔴почему так сложно бывает сделать один шаг? 🟣какие люди действуют 🩷 — делитесь, что думаете, что чувствуете в такие моменты? #подкаст 📎забустить канал 📎lizis о блогинге и жизни
custom 530129753382010201416custom 537293747664823437313custom 534823733018233854811custom 53801023625662597063
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 537322214708061733318custom 532802801870100580113custom 537293747664823437311
🤩🍬` ну как люблю наши вечера [слушайте, как Эми говорит]⬇️ #кнопиныистории 📎забустить канал 📎lizis о блогинге и жизни
custom 53482373301823385488custom 53729374766482343736custom 53732221470806173334
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @liziscontent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А что по продукту?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько у меня здесь людей, которые продают свои услуги/товары?
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 30 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,117,035 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“лизис о блогинге и жизни” (@liziscontent), 1,660 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liziscontent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.