аписинк
custom 5388686520427242173674

Channel
@liza_ficus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,394subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001555781191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liza_ficus |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liza_ficus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 4,394 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 4,400 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 4,399 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 4,401 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 4,401 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,835 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5388686520427242173 | 2,835 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,835reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @liza_ficus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 28 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
аписинк
custom 5388686520427242173674
кмм 🦇
custom 5388686520427242173611
вчера наконец то сделала небольшой завоз на призрачную полочку! все кто ждал определенные позиции можете теперь приобрести их офлайн в магазине или онлайн 🕺 (отдельное спасибо тем кто оперативно скупил остатки мерча!!! очень помогли)
custom 5388686520427242173152
⚡ Премьера! «Оля на поле» – первый выпуск мульт-блога, в котором «Красные Метеоры» и «Синие Вымпелы» отвечают на вопросы фанатов! В новой серии «Чемпионов» анимационные спортсмены заговорят – впервые в сериале! И раскроют все (или почти все) свои секреты Оле, начинающему, но очень увлечённому блогеру и поклоннице «Метеоров» и «Вымпелов»! 👱♀️: С вами Оля на поле! Привет всем подписчикам моего блога! Я, как всегда, …
custom 5388686520427242173168
БЕЖИМ СМОТРЕТЬ все очень старались!!!
custom 538868652042724217395
ребята я сегодня родился, можете побаловать попиарить меня при желании. спасибо большое вам всем за поддержку
custom 5388686520427242173212
МОЙ ЛУЧШИЙ БРО РОДИЛСЯ СЕДНЯ
custom 538868652042724217392
🤪 МИСТИКА! ХИТРЮК! ШЕПС! ДРУЖКО! ЗУБ! Самая жуткая серия «Зубы на полку» мультсериала «Чемпионы» уже в VK Видео и на YouTube! Петя Хитрюк находит загадочный артефакт — древний зуб, который запускает цепочку аномалий, и привычный матч превращается в настоящее испытание с элементами сверхъестественного 😨 Смотрите серию «Зубы на полку»: 📺 VK Видео 📺 YouTube #Союзмультфильм #Чемпионы
custom 5388686520427242173183
ВСЕМ СМОТРЕТЬ ЭТОТ НИШТЯК первая серия где я в титрах!
custom 5388686520427242173120
у меня сегодня день рождения! 🎀 спасибо вам огромное что следите за моим творчеством👁 буду очень рада подарочным репостикам❤️
custom 5388686520427242173528
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @liza_ficus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 253,964 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“fикуs | Лиза Рец” (@liza_ficus), 4,394 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liza_ficus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.