Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

2016 ch

@liya3442

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

217subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001030931395
TypeChannel
Username@liya3442
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/liya3442

Growth

214217215.511 Aug 2026, 17:46 — 214 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:25 — 217 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 17:4612 Aug 2026, 06:25
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 214–217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:25217+3
11 Aug 2026, 17:46214first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
111.0%
avg views ÷ 217 subscribers
Avg views / post
241
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held15 (2 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total3,613
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 23s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC121 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

看看这个贱狗,就是个废物,怎么都不硬,只配主人掳他

9 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC155 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

小贱货犯错了,得好好的赏鞭子才行,被打他才爽,贱货一个✌️✌️

9 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC156 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

小贱货就喜欢主人的丝袜,趁一下,JJ就硬了,骚的很✌️✌️✌️

9 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC181 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

小哥哥们,你们看看,心动吗 这舌头👅,舔的该有多爽啊✌️✌️✌️💕💕💕💕

9 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC183 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

小哥哥,第一次玩马眼,挺好,的,没有痛💕💕💕✌️🐻

7 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC223 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

看看贱货好骚,用脚玩一下就哼哼唧唧的,爽死了,好贱,不听话,让主人,用跨夹住他折磨他

7 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC237 viewsread 11 August 2026

今天给小哥哥玩前高,两个小时,濆了很多,小哥哥真厉害,每次过来就玩前高,二个小时

3 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC379 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

看看这身材,这巨乳,小哥哥们流口水没,真胸,不参假,E杯罩✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @liya3442. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,052,583 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“2016 ch” (@liya3442), 217 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liya3442.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.