Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Security Talks

Channel

Security Talks

@livesecuritytalks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

135subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001373395172
TypeChannel
Username@livesecuritytalks
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 15 January 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/livesecuritytalks

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

135140137.57 August 2026 — 140 subscribers8 August 2026 — 140 subscribers8 September 2026 — 139 subscribers15 September 2026 — 138 subscribers29 September 2026 — 137 subscribers9 October 2026 — 135 subscribers7 August 20269 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 64 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134–141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 21:37135-2
29 Sept 2026, 13:19137-1
15 Sept 2026, 19:16138-1
8 Sept 2026, 14:35139-1
8 Aug 2026, 22:31140no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:41140first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 January 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤936.0%
👎728.0%
👍416.0%
🔥416.0%
💯14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2021 to 29 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 May 2023, 15:22 UTCviews —

Security Talks pinned «برای دیدن این گفتگو میتونید از لینک زیر استفاده کنید. ممنون از حمایت و همراهیتون ❤️ https://youtu.be/fsa2bkB_e1M»

29 May 2023, 15:21 UTC642 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

برای دیدن این گفتگو میتونید از لینک زیر استفاده کنید. ممنون از حمایت و همراهیتون ❤️ https://youtu.be/fsa2bkB_e1M

👎3👍2

20 May 2023, 09:38 UTCviews —

Security Talks pinned «سلام، قسمت دوم علیرضا وزیری عزیز مهمون ما بود و کلی گپ زدیم، بزودی ویدئوی کامل منتشر میشه. ممنون از حمایتتون ❤️ S2E2A - Alireza Vaziri - علیرضا وزیری https://youtu.be/MKux_mEbgJo»

20 May 2023, 09:38 UTC589 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

سلام، قسمت دوم علیرضا وزیری عزیز مهمون ما بود و کلی گپ زدیم، بزودی ویدئوی کامل منتشر میشه. ممنون از حمایتتون ❤️ S2E2A - Alireza Vaziri - علیرضا وزیری https://youtu.be/MKux_mEbgJo

👎4🔥2💯1

7 May 2023, 13:25 UTCviews —

Security Talks pinned «همین الان قسمت این گفتگو در دسترس هست و میتونید از لینک زیر تماشا کنید، منتظر نظرات و پیشنهاداتون هستیم. https://youtu.be/iKCoyr9OWIc ممنون که حمایت میکنید. ❤️»

7 May 2023, 13:25 UTC613 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

همین الان قسمت این گفتگو در دسترس هست و میتونید از لینک زیر تماشا کنید، منتظر نظرات و پیشنهاداتون هستیم. https://youtu.be/iKCoyr9OWIc ممنون که حمایت میکنید. ❤️

❤7🔥2👍1

4 May 2023, 21:36 UTC519 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

سلام، ما دوباره برگشتیم تا گپ و گفت رو از سر بگیریم. برای قسمت اول سراغ یکی از قدیمی های کامیتونیتی امنیت رفتیم و گفتگویی داشتیم با حمید کشفی . ویدئوی این گفتگو یکشنبه ۱۷ اردیبهشت در دسترس خواهد بود. لطفا در یوتیوب ما subscribe کنید. ❤️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kq3F1zGjRws

❤2

3 Aug 2021, 12:39 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 8 August 2026

#Talk015 ‏خوشحالیم که باز تونستیم در کنارتون باشیم. اگر به لایو نرسیدید و دوست دارید این قسمت رو ببینید در لینک زیر در دسترس هست: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NIGugZkr2M ممنون از حمایتتون.❤️ @livesecuritytalks

22 Jul 2021, 16:56 UTC927 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

بدلیل مشکل فنی لینک عوض شد و میتونید از ادرس زیر لایو رو ببینید https://youtu.be/1NIGugZkr2M

👍1

22 Jul 2021, 11:55 UTC868 viewsread 8 August 2026

امروز، ساعت ۲۱ لایو از این لینک در دسترس خواهد بود. https://t.co/hR4IechSQh ممنون از حمایتتون ❤

15 Jul 2021, 12:00 UTC970 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#Talk015 پنجشنبه ۳۱ تیرماه ساعت ۹ شب، همراه میشیم با برنا نعمت زاده تا در مورد حملات منطقی در وب صحبت کنیم. در آدرس زیر منتظرتون هستیم: https://www.youtube.com/c/securitytalks ممنون از حمایتتون❤ @livesecuritytalks

18 Jun 2021, 09:00 UTC799 viewsread 8 August 2026

#Talk014 ‏خوشحالیم که باز تونستیم در کنارتون باشیم. اگر به لایو نرسیدید و دوست دارید این قسمت رو ببینید در لینک زیر در دسترس هست: https://youtu.be/nZ3fbwt0GjE ممنون از حمایتتون.❤️ @livesecuritytalks

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @livesecuritytalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Security Talks” (@livesecuritytalks), 135 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/livesecuritytalks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.