Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,531–9,667 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 22:17
9,644
+6
14 Sept 2026, 09:00
9,638
-13
10 Sept 2026, 08:01
9,651
+15
4 Sept 2026, 17:15
9,636
-6
1 Sept 2026, 01:33
9,642
+10
28 Aug 2026, 14:12
9,632
+17
25 Aug 2026, 11:38
9,615
+19
22 Aug 2026, 12:34
9,596
+9
18 Aug 2026, 22:06
9,587
+11
15 Aug 2026, 20:28
9,576
-5
12 Aug 2026, 12:37
9,581
-11
9 Aug 2026, 17:23
9,592
+38
6 Aug 2026, 20:20
9,554
+7
6 Aug 2026, 02:50
9,547
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:38
9,547
first reading
Engagement
261 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.9%
avg views ÷ 9,644 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,820
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
114
of 261 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
261 (4 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
549,147
Reactions total
16,483
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 35s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,075 reactions across 250 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11,896
32.1%
👍
7,959
21.5%
🔥
4,907
13.2%
🤣
4,388
11.8%
🤬
2,111
5.69%
custom 5271724003927550689
1,983
5.35%
😢
1,960
5.29%
🤔
634
1.71%
custom 5359652601635824340
631
1.70%
🤯
606
1.63%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 261 of the 261 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,865 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 261 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bilasizmi Bredli Barkolya nega 29-raqam tanlagan?
Barkolya yoshligida FIFA simulyatorini o’ynashni juda yaxshi ko’rgan va bilsangiz FIFAning “The Journey” qismida Aleks Hanter ismli futbolchidan boshlaysiz va bu futbolchi aynan 29-raqamni kiyadi.
Barkolya kun kelib pro futbolga kirganda doim 29-raqamni kiyimni shundan reja qilgan.
Ayni paytda ham “Liverpul”da 29-raqam bo’sh va o’z egasini kutmoqda.
👉 @liverpoolas…
#preview
"Liverpul" — "Nottingem"
Oʻyinni oʻtkazib yuboradigan futbolchilar
Konor Bredli, Jo Gomes, Jovanni Leoni, Ugo Ekitike, Fede Kyeza, Stefan Baychetich — Ibraim Sangare, Nikola Savona
Oʻyinni oʻtkazib yuborishi mumkin boʻlgan futbolchilar
Harvey Elliott — Morgan Gibbs-Uayt, Niko Uillyams, Rayan Yetes
Oʻyinga oid faktlar va statistikalar
* Jamoalar shu kunga qadar barsha musobaqalar doirasida 125 marotaba…
#matchday #anons
Angliya Premyer-ligasi. 2-tur
"Liverpul" — "Nottingem Forest"
🏟 Stadion: "Enfild"
🗓 29.08.2026
⌚️ Soat 16:30
🖥 Translyatsiya: Setanta Sports 1
🧑✈️ Bosh hakam: Sem Barrott
⛳️ Assistentlar: Adam Nann, Ueyd Smit
👮♂️Zahira hakami: Tim Robinson
🧑💻VAR: Maykl Oliver
👨💻AVAR: Jeyms Meynuoring.
👉 @liverpoolasia
Angliya Liga kubogi doirasida "Tottenhem"ga qarshi oʻyinimiz sanasi va vaqti maʼlum boʻldi.
🗓 16-sentyabr
⏰ 23:55 (Toshkent vaqti bilan)
👉 @liverpoolasia
Shuningdek, Firmino Isakka sabrli bo’lishi kerakligi va unga ishonishini ham aytdi.
“Aleks ijobiy kayfiyatni saqlab qolishi kerak. Barcha hujumchilar faoliyatida qiyin davrlar bo‘ladi, ammo u oldingi yillarda Premier Liganing eng yaxshi hujumchilaridan biri ekanini allaqachon isbotlagan.
“Liverpul”dek katta klubda o‘ynaganingda doimo bosim bo‘ladi, ayniqsa klub seni sotib olish uchun katta pul sarflagan bo‘lsa. Lek…
Firmino shuningdek mashxur trioni ham esga oldi:
“Bu uchlik juda yaxshi ishlaganining sababi shundaki, Mo, Sadio va men bir-birimizni to‘ldiradigan xususiyatlarga ega edik. Barchamiz gol ura olardik, shu bilan birga bir-birimizga vaziyat ham yaratib bera olardik. Maydonda kim qayerda turgani va to‘pni qayerga uzatish kerakligi borasida bir-birimizni juda yaxshi tushunardik.
Mo Turkiyada yangi sahifani boshlayotgan …
Roberto Firmino Yurgen Klopp hozirgi aloqalari haqida:
“Ba’zida Instagram orqali bir-birimizga yozib turamiz. Yurgen oldida qarzdorman, chunki u faoliyatim davomida menga juda katta yordam berdi.
“Liverpul”ga kelganimda dastlab oson bo‘lmagan, ammo u menga chin dildan ishondi. U menga jamoasi uchun qanchalik muhim futbolchi bo‘lishimni aytgan edi.
Uni yana murabbiylikka qaytganini ko‘rish juda yaxshi. “Liverpul”da…
“Liverpul” buyuklaridan biri hisoblangan Roberto Firmino:
“Bu klub men va oilam uchun hamma narsani anglatadi. U yerdagi odamlar bizga doimo juda yaxshi munosabatda bo‘lishgan.
Bizda juda ko‘p ajoyib xotiralar bor. Men urgan gollar, qo‘lga kiritgan sovrinlarimiz va shahar bo‘ylab o‘tkazilgan chempionlik paradlari bizga ulkan quvonch bag‘ishlagan.
U yerda shuncha yil o‘ynash imkoniga ega bo‘lganim — Yaratganning me…
“Valensiya” Harvi Elliot uchun “Liverpul” bilan ayni paytda muzokaralar olib bormoqda.
Faqat xabarlarga qaraganda, bu sotib olish majburiyatisiz 1 mavsumga ijaraga bo’lishi mumkin. Elliotning “Liverpul” bilan shartnomasi esa kelasi yozda o’z yakuniga yetadi.
🌕 [Fabritsio Romano]
👉 @liverpoolasia
Ibrahim Mbaye baribir APLga o’tadigan bo’ldi. 🌕 Devid Ornshteynning yozishicha, “Aston Villa” 18 yoshli vingerni 55 mln. yevroga xarid qilish borasida “PSJ” bilan prinsipial kelishuvga erishdi.
“Liverpul” ham bu vingerga qiziqib kelayotgan edi.
👉 @liverpoolasia
🤬153🤣31❤13👍11
Showing the 12 most recent of 261 posts we hold for @liverpuluzofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@liverpuluzofficial edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ronald Arauxoning transfer darajasini qanday baholaysiz?
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️26%
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️31%
⭐️⭐️⭐️23%
⭐️⭐️20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 261 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liverpool.asia” (@liverpuluzofficial), 9,644 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liverpuluzofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
