Posted without readable text

Channel
.
@liverpool_club_1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,888subscribers
-122 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001907782092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liverpool_club_1 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liverpool_club_1 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 1,888 | -33 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 1,921 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 1,936 | -20 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 1,956 | -15 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 1,971 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:26 | 1,977 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 1,989 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 1,991 | -16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 2,007 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 2,010 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Channel name was changed to «.»
I want to express my gratitude to each of you. Thank you for supporting the channel. But I don't see the point in continuing to run the channel anymore. Thank you all and good luck ❤️
😢2
Signed X.B.X
Victor Munoz will wear the No.23 shirt for Liverpool. The Reds agreed a deal to sign the forward from Osasuna in June and his squad number has now been confirmed.
❤1
Signed X.B.X
🚨 𝗗𝗜𝗗 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗞𝗡𝗢𝗪: Alisson has the highest save percentage (72.1%) of any Premier League goalkeeper with 500+ saves since joining Liverpool in 2018/19.
❤1
Signed X.B.X
Who should start at left wing for Liverpool this season? 🤔
Signed X.B.X
🆕 Inter have made a third approach for Curtis Jones. Inter, via intermediaries, communicated a willingness to go to €35m. Not quite viewed as a bid. Unlikely to be high enough to get a deal done, but Inter haven't ruled out a new offer. Liverpool's valuation has been €40m+ all summer but it could even take closer to €50m
Signed X.B.X
🟥 Liverpool's first 6 games of the Premier League season are against teams with new managers: ▪️ Newcastle United — Matthias Jaissle ▪️ Nottingham Forest — Oliver Glasner ▪️ Ipswich Town — Gary O'Neil ▪️ Fulham — Álvaro Arbeloa ▪️ Bournemouth — Marco Rose ▪️ Manchester City — Enzo Maresca
Signed X.B.X
BREAKING: Liverpool have CONTACTED PSG over a double swoop for Bradley Barcola & Desire Doue ✓ Liverpools initial offer is said to be €250 million + Cody Gakpo PSG have stated they are not willing to accept €251 million for the pair
Signed X.B.X
🗣️ Andoni Iraola on Florian Wirtz: “Obviously like all the others, but with him especially we need a good version of Florian. We know what he can give us, he suits our game model. I see him in a position behind a striker, we are going to start working with him in that position. He is quite complete as a player. We want to add more things to what he already has which is very good. He is in a good place mentally."
Signed X.B.X
Which youngster has impressed you the most so far during pre season?🧐
Signed X.B.X
🔴 IT’S MATCHDAY! Pre-season continues tonight as Liverpool take on Wrexham in New York. 🇺🇸 Score predictions, Reds? #LFC
Signed X.B.X
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @liverpool_club_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@liverpool_worldwide · 62,593
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
@PL_live_football · 20,777
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“.” (@liverpool_club_1), 1,888 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liverpool_club_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.