Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for در ستایش شب

Channel

در ستایش شب

@liveafterandbefordeath

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,108subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001713166764
TypeChannel
Username@liveafterandbefordeath
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/liveafterandbefordeath

Growth

1,1041,1081,10610 August 2026 — 1,104 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,104 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,108 subscribers10 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,103–1,109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:081,108+4
10 Aug 2026, 15:001,104no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:471,104first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.5%
avg views ÷ 1,108 subscribers
Avg views / post
283
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total5,652
Reactions total183
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8244.8%
💔3418.6%
🤝2212.0%
👌179.29%
👍147.65%
💋31.64%
💘31.64%
🔥31.64%
🕊31.64%
❤‍🔥21.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC175 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026

وای همین‌و منتال قشنگ‌تر می‌گفت، یه چیزی می‌گفت با این مفهوم که آدمای بدغذا، سکسشونم خوب نیست چون سرشونو نمی‌کنن لاپات😂😂😂

🤝16💘3

10 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC158 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Hafezbajoghli

من یه کشفی کردم! تمام کسانیکه اصرار به مارینیت کردن گوشت دارن، با طعم واقعی گوشت مشکل دارن، و همه‌ی کسانی که با طعم واقعی گوشت مشکل دارن به درجاتی مقاومت ناخودآگاه به سکس دارن. خوش‌سکس‌ترین انسان‌ها همانا کسانی هستند که اصراری به مارینیت کردن گوشت ندارند. اما اگر مارینیت کردن گوشت صرفن به دلیل تنوع باشد و در آن الحاح و اصرار نورزند، بلا اشکال است. @hafezbajoghli

6

10 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC169 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

وقتی یه مراجعه کننده مجدد زنگ میزنه اول فکر میکنم حساسیتی چیزی نشون داده و الان می‌خواد پاره‌م کنه، بعد که می‌گه راضی بوده و برای دخترش وقت می‌خواد، نفس راحتی می‌کشم! حالا بازم از اعتماد به نفسم براتون تعریف می‌کنم‌.

10

9 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC238 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

از بس هر کلمه‌ای رو برای هر مفهوم دری وری‌ای بازیچه‌ی خودمون کردیم که یه سریاشون واقعا جنده شده‌ن.

6

9 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC242 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

البته درک من از روح چیز متفاوتی از جسم نیست، یه سری فعل و انفعالات شیمیایی و سیگنال‌های مغزیه که به فرد باورِ من بودن میده و ویندوز آدمیزاد رو بالا میاره.

5🤝1

9 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC244 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ولی کار درمان اینجوری نیست، تو داری می‌میری، مریض هم داره می‌میره، تو‌ روحی، مریض جسمی. تو از جسمت مایه می‌ذاری، روح مریضو برمیگردونی به بدنش. سر و گردن جدا شده رو کنار هم نگه می‌داری و یادت میره چقدر بدبخت بودی.

1

9 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC243 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

احساس می‌کنم انجام کار درمان در زمان دپرسی، ممکن‌تره تا کار زیبایی. مثلا دارم فکر می‌کنم سوزن‌ توی دستم رو کجام فرو کنم که بمیرم، یهو‌ یادم میاد بازش کرده بودم که مزو تزریق کنم.

❤‍🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC256 viewsread 10 August 2026

مامانم و بعد از مامانم، جانشین برحقش، من!

9 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC253 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @NolanWrites

انسان «بذار خودم انجامش بدم» Homo Letmedoitus زیستگاه: کنار هر کسی که مشغول انجام کاری باشد. ویژگی رفتاری: ابتدا درخواست کمک می‌کند. سپس کنترل کامل عملیات را در دست می‌گیرد. صدای مخصوص: «نه نه، بده من.» «این‌طوری نیست.» «بذار سریع انجامش بدم.» رابطه با محیط: به تدریج تمام اطرافیان را به موجوداتی ناتوان تبدیل می‌کند و سپس از ناتوانی آن‌ها شکایت می‌کند. از کتاب «دانشنامه‌ی دردسرهای دوپا» به قلم نولان

9 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC276 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

هیچ‌چیز به اندازه حرف نمی‌تونه من‌و به جنون برسونه.

👍5

8 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC323 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

اول صبحی: بیمار سابقه شیمی درمانی داره و رگاش سوخته، این رگ مریض مناسب بیهوشی نیست پاره می‌شه، یا رگ‌ مرکزی براش گرفته بشه یا برگرده بخش. مریض: نه ایشالله پاره نمی‌شه، رگ دیگه‌ای نگیرید، من می‌دونم هیچی نمی‌شه، با همین بیهوشم کنید. #من_بدن_خودم‌و_بهتر_می‌شناسم

💔17

7 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC334 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

من نیاز به یه رابطه‌ی متفاوت با دکتر مکری دارم! مثلا یه وبلاگ هواداری بزنم براش و روزمره باش درد و دل کنم. حتی سناریوی دیدار و گفت و گوی خیالی باش بچینم. ۱۳ الی ۱۵ سالگیم همچین حسی به فرهاد مجیدی داشتم.

👍9🤝3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @liveafterandbefordeath. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,226,825 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“در ستایش شب” (@liveafterandbefordeath), 1,108 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liveafterandbefordeath.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.