Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Живая Вологда

@live_vologda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,574subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001571918149
TypeChannel
Username@live_vologda
DescriptionПрислать новость, информацию @News35region_bot
Created12 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/live_vologda

Growth

12,57412,57512,574.513 August 2026 — 12,575 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,575 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,574 subscribers13 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,574–12,575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 09:4712,574-1
13 Aug 2026, 22:2812,575no change
13 Aug 2026, 07:3112,575first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.88%
avg views ÷ 12,574 subscribers
Avg views / post
488
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.688%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held35 (10 June 202615 August 2026)
Views total14,151
Reactions total66
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,670
Videos
2,240
Links
606

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
45s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

150 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3422.7%
🔥2516.7%
🙏1812.0%
🕊96.00%
❤‍🔥74.67%
😁74.67%
😡74.67%
🍾64.00%
🙉64.00%
👍42.67%
👎42.67%
💊42.67%
🤷‍♂42.67%
🥰42.67%
😭32.00%
💯21.33%
🤣21.33%
🤬21.33%
🙈10.667%
🤝10.667%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 35 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @live_vologda. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC129 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Вологжане задают вопросы ??? Что делать при объявлении Ракетная Опасность

15 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC205 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро всем ДТП на Текстильщиков /Беляева

14 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC391 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Крипто-аферисты из Вологды отправятся под суд ⚖️ Двое 19-летних парней решили «заработать» на доверчивых пользователях, обещая им легкую прибыль на арбитраже TON. Они заманивали жертв в соцсетях, а затем подменяли адреса кошельков с помощью манипуляций с MEMO-кодами. Итог: 4 доказанных эпизода, ущерб до 50 тысяч рублей по каждому и уголовное дело. Сами «бизнесмены» признались, что когда-то и сами попались на таку

1🥰1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC347 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Долг превратился в ловушку: житель Тотьмы вымогал у знакомого 5 миллионов рублей История началась с обычного займа: 29-летний мужчина одолжил знакомому 840 тысяч на машину. Когда пришло время отдавать деньги, кредитор начал угрожать расправой и «накручивать» огромные проценты. Даже после того, как потерпевший продал автомобиль и отдал все вырученные деньги, «долг» продолжал расти. Вторая попытка занять деньги лишь

🔥2🕊1😡1

14 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC404 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Макет нового фонтана который будет установлен на площади революции привезли в Вологду🔥

😁4💊3👍1😡1

14 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC517 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ракетная опасность

🕊5😡3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @live_vologda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Проактивный анализатор
@volanalitic · 131,965
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
ПоZыVной «Vологда»
@vologdapoz · 136,832
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Живая Вологда” (@live_vologda), 12,574 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/live_vologda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.