Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

👁🐇 Little Nightmares & Reanimal Confession 👁🐇

@littlnightmares

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,483subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002000677724
TypeChannel
Username@littlnightmares
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/littlnightmares

Growth

1,4761,4831,479.56 August 2026 — 1,477 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,476 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,481 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,483 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,475–1,484 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:331,483+2
10 Aug 2026, 00:311,481+5
6 Aug 2026, 20:001,476-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:521,477first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.94%
avg views ÷ 1,483 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held32 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,293
Reactions total496
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
52s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

496 reactions across 29 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19338.9%
custom 545212583308901252611122.4%
❤‍🔥7414.9%
🔥285.65%
💘214.23%
custom 5163712267992171162122.42%
custom 5292097228540764610102.02%
🎉102.02%
custom 597635705147385980881.61%
🎃71.41%
💋51.01%
🥰40.806%
🙏30.605%
🕊20.403%
😨20.403%
🙊20.403%
🍓10.202%
😍10.202%
😭10.202%
🤓10.202%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 496reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC43 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Заканчиваем день с Солдатом и Заключённой Автор: fablewardOO #дейли |👁🐇| @cflnbot

6custom 54521258330890125263❤‍🔥1

Signed Игорь Килька

7 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC72 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ПРАВИЛЬНЫЙ ОТВЕТ — КУКЛА ПРИТВОРЩИЦЫ Первые угадали : 1. бихисо 2. Ульяна 3. andri_andri26 #угадайка |👁🐇| @cflnbot

Signed А я черешня 🍒🔦 [👁️🐇] [🔦🗝️]

7 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC81 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

УГАДАЙ ПРЕДМЕТ Подсказка: предмет из VLN !!Обязательно для прочтения!! Правила данного интерактива: 1. Писать свое мнение исключительно в комментариях под постом, чтобы вас засчитали. 2. У вас есть 3 попытки на угадывание. 3. Даже если вы нашли фото, не нужно его присылать. 4. Не нужно никому ничего доказывать. у каждого может быть разное мнение и в этом нет проблемы. 5. Если за 20 минут не будет ни одного угадавше

2

Signed А я черешня 🍒🔦 [👁️🐇] [🔦🗝️]

7 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC103 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Напоминаем, что сегодня в 21:30 мск начнётся THQ Nordic Showcase, на котором анонсируют первую главу Расширенного мира REANIMAL. #конфа |👁🐇| @cflnbot

🎉10custom 545212583308901252684

Signed Игорь Килька

7 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC114 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Друзья держатся вместе Автор: chawawanya #дейли |👁🐇| @cflnbot

❤‍🔥11🔥2custom 545212583308901252621💋1💘1🕊1

Signed Игорь Килька

7 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC102 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Беглец для @chereshnya331 (я ждала почти месяц чтобы она его получила и я смогла выложить это в тейк :D) 🍒: СЫН НА РОДИНЕ УРА #тейк |👁🐇| @cflnbot

custom 545212583308901252683❤‍🔥2💘1🔥1custom 52920972285407646101

Signed А я черешня 🍒🔦 [👁️🐇] [🔦🗝️]

7 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC112 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

нуу... в ибисе пальцем уже привычнее🥲 #тейк |👁🐇| @cflnbot

9❤‍🔥3🔥3custom 54521258330890125262

Signed Игорь Килька

7 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC112 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ТУПА МЫ – Солдат и Заключенная. автор: Saladget #Яикто!! |👁🐇| @cflnbot

13❤‍🔥2🔥2💋1💘1

Signed iditenahuy Марихуануттка 👁️🐇

7 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC121 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩Сидим в колодце Автор: ladybugbrooch5 #дейли |👁🐇| @cflnbot

custom 545212583308901252672💘2❤‍🔥1🔥1😭1

Signed Игорь Килька

7 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC137 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

мне чертовски зашёл дизайн солдата, так что в час ночи решил наскетчить ее. она такая милая!!☺️ тгк: https://t.me/s4lsosal228 тт: s4l_.gh тамблер: s4l470zg пинтерест: s4l470zg тредс: s4l470zg #тейк!! |👁🐇| @cflnbot

custom 545212583308901252694❤‍🔥2💋1💘1🔥1

Signed Игорь Килька

7 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC130 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩Давайте петь вместе! Автор: honekkokarutan #дейли |👁🐇| @cflnbot

13custom 54521258330890125264🔥2❤‍🔥1💋1💘1🕊1custom 52920972285407646101

Signed Игорь Килька

7 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC126 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

6+ часов ушло на это, я устал🖼 Неанон Виполяр #тейк!! |👁🐇| @cflnbot

15custom 54521258330890125263🔥1custom 52920972285407646101

Signed ⚰Ватахэл🌹[👁🐇](шедевро Фокс)

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @littlnightmares. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 325,500 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👁🐇 Little Nightmares & Reanimal Confession 👁🐇” (@littlnightmares), 1,483 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/littlnightmares.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.