Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LitMind

Channel

LitMind

@litmind

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

318subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001135030927
TypeChannel
Username@litmind
Created2 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/litmind

Growth

3173193187 August 2026 — 319 subscribers8 August 2026 — 319 subscribers15 August 2026 — 317 subscribers23 August 2026 — 318 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 317–319 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 00:26318+1
15 Aug 2026, 19:16317-2
8 Aug 2026, 07:32319no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:54319first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

429 reactions across 20 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🖕8419.6%
7317.0%
🤡4510.5%
🤔388.86%
💯368.39%
👎204.66%
🔥204.66%
👍163.73%
😁163.73%
👏122.80%
🗿81.86%
😈81.86%
🤮71.63%
💩61.40%
🤪51.17%
🍌40.932%
💘40.932%
🕊40.932%
🌭30.699%
😭30.699%
9 further kinds173.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 429reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2025 to 9 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Feb 2026, 21:14 UTC≈3,730 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

If you want to do, stop thinking.

🤔17👎63🤡3👍2💘2🥰1

2 Jan 2026, 21:34 UTC≈5,200 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026

It's not your fault, but it is your responsibility.

27🤡12💯4💔2👍1🤣1🦄1

1 Jan 2026, 09:16 UTC≈5,270 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Saying no is a very cheap way to get people to show you their true selves. Say it often.

💯17🤡72🐳2🌭1🍌1

31 Dec 2025, 23:30 UTC≈5,250 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Does life happen to you, or do you happen to life?

🤔15🤡75🍌3😁3

14 Oct 2025, 18:16 UTC≈7,850 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“Don’t think of humans as the crown of creation. Instead, view human civilization as part of a much grander scheme, an important step (but not the last one) on the path of the universe from very simple initial conditions toward more and more unfathomable complexity.” — Jürgen Schmidhuber

🖕14🔥6💯41🌭1💘1🤔1🥰1

14 Oct 2025, 17:59 UTC≈7,020 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“Before the next century is over, human beings will no longer be the most intelligent or capable type of entity on the planet.” — Ray Kurzweil, 1999

8👏2🤡1

14 Oct 2025, 17:56 UTC≈6,710 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“Imagine all the food you have eaten in your life and consider that you are simply some of that food, rearranged.” — Max Tegmark

🤡11

9 Oct 2025, 15:11 UTC≈6,630 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“Most of the important things in the world have been accomplished by people who have kept on trying when there seemed to be no hope at all.” — Dale Carnegie

😭3🔥21👍1🤡1

14 Aug 2025, 21:22 UTC≈7,790 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“The continuation of authority in the same person has frequently proved the undoing of democratic governments. Repeated elections are essential to the system of popular governments, because there is nothing so dangerous as to suffer Power to be vested for a long time in one citizen. The people become accustomed to obeying him, and he becomes accustomed to commanding, hence the origin of usurpation and tyranny.” — Sim

🖕109👎3🗿3🤡3🔥1

4 Aug 2025, 17:12 UTC≈7,350 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“Though liberals do a great deal of talking about hearing other points of view, it sometimes shocks them to learn that there are other points of view.” — William F. Buckley Jr., 1959

💯11👎2🖕2🤣1

24 Jul 2025, 23:00 UTC≈7,290 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“The struggle is always between the individual and his sacred right to express himself and the power structure that seeks conformity, suppression, and obedience.” — William O. Douglas, 1974

👍10🖕9🗿3🤪3🤮3👎2🕊2🏆1

25 Jun 2025, 10:53 UTC≈7,630 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“Your game has to just barely work, so don't spend your time making some technical marvel that you can write a PhD paper about; it just has to work. [...] I know all the bugs, I know how much duct tape is just barely holding the game together; So just, spend your time making the game good enough, and making it fun, and I promise, if you keep iteratively getting better and better and better, you too will be releasing

😁11🤮4🗿2🌭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @litmind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LitMind” (@litmind), 318 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/litmind.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.