Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Литературно и не очень

Channel

Литературно и не очень

@literaturno_neochen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

203subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001538774832
TypeChannel
Username@literaturno_neochen
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/literaturno_neochen

Growth

200203201.58 August 2026 — 200 subscribers9 August 2026 — 201 subscribers16 August 2026 — 203 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 200–203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:47203+2
9 Aug 2026, 14:21201+1
8 Aug 2026, 19:32200first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.3%
avg views ÷ 203 subscribers
Avg views / post
102
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held11 (23 June 202628 July 2026)
Views total511
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
1m 54s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7872.9%
❤‍🔥1413.1%
💔1110.3%
🍓43.74%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC51 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ПОЭТЕССА: ЭСТЕТИЧЕСКАЯ НЕПРИСТОЙНОСТЬ И ЭРОТИКА ГРАФОМАНСТВА Что же потеряла поэтесса и что она пародирует? Согласно Мандельштаму, поэтесса, как бедная Изида, ищет пропавшую часть тела Озириса, по легенде не что иное, как его божественный фаллос. Отсюда — любопытное переплетение сексуальности и эстетики. Сам Фрейд считал, что поэты понимают женщин лучше, чем психиатры, при этом его собственное описание женской сексу

6

22 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC207 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дмитрий Крымов «Курс. Разговоры со студентами» Театральный художник ведет семинары со студентами: после этого курса хочется читать только русскую литературу 19-20 века, разбираться в любом своем деле глубже, дотошнее, внимательнее, погружаться в искусство как в бездну, отдаваясь ей, ходить по тротуарам как по тропе чудес или лабиринту, выискивая в нем неграненые алмазы. Искусство театра я способна оценить несколько

9❤‍🔥2

21 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC65 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Любимая рубрика: практики летнего чтения

9

21 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC115 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что я прочитала за полгода Январь 1. Ясунари Кавабата «Тысячекрылый журавль» 2. Линор Горалик «Тетрадь Катерины Суворовой» 3. Мэри Шелли «Франкенштейн, или современный Прометей» 4. Джон Полидори «Вампир» 5. Отфрид Пройслер «Крабат, или Легенды старой мельницы» ⭐️⭐️⭐️ 6. Шарлотта Инден «Дорогой Санта! История волшебной переписки» ⭐️ 7. Екатерина Бакунина «Тело» ⭐️⭐️ 8. Алексей Поляринов «Кадавры» 9. Полина Максимова

12

20 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTC73 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ценность того, что я делаю Ее нет. Помыть полы, сварить детям кашу. Круг сужается пускай только польза от меня и останется. Пустопорожнее. Бессмысленное. Я. Болят места уколов. Что-то отпускает, что-то наваливается с новой силой. Где мои силы, которые светили во мне? Где мои нервы, что блуждают вовне? Где мои руки, что держали, сучили сукно? Где мои мысли, разбредшись в тупой тишине?

💔114

7 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC109 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥8🍓4

7 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,530 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Андрес Неуман «Однажды Аргентина» У Неумана в руках есть семейное древо, пара семейных преданий и разрозненных свидетельств — и есть задача собрать из этого историю. Автор много экспериментирует с формой, перемешивая байки о родственниках с собственными детскими воспоминаниями, красноречивыми эпизодами о сложной политической судьбе Аргентины и восстанавливая колоритные, но едва уловимые образы прадедов и прабабок. О

6❤‍🔥4

3 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTC103 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Списки помогают писать Писатели составляют списки, чтобы не забыть о чем-то (герои, их качества, сцены и эпизоды), ведут хаотичные заметки (записывают все подряд, что-то пригодится). Мне было бы интересно посмотреть на список сцен какого-то романа глазами автора: как он видел свой замысел, из каких опорных точек растил его? Список как модель мира Писатель возводит стены нового мира, и любое произведение можно рассма

7

24 Jun 2026, 06:13 UTC104 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что есть хорошего из книжек и что можно успеть Сначала о грустном. 💧Книжный «Перед прочтением сжечь» закрывается 7 июля. Скидка на все 25%. 💧30 июня продажа замечательных сказок Роальда Даля будет приостановлена. Сейчас их можно купить на сайте издательства «Самокат» со скидкой 25% по промокоду ДАЛЬ. И то остались не все книжки в наличии, но оставшиеся на 100% мастхэв, проверено мной и моими детьми: «Чарли и Шокола

8

23 Jun 2026, 08:40 UTC89 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Георгиевский собор в городе Юрьев-Польский, XIII в. Последний белокаменный храм домонгольского периода Искали мы там слона, искали. Только с подсказкой нашли, с земли почти не разглядеть. Да, на стене есть вырезанный слон на комариных ножках. Почему слон? В XIII веке на Руси? Загадка.

10

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @literaturno_neochen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,349,275 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Литературно и не очень” (@literaturno_neochen), 203 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/literaturno_neochen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.