Channel

by NibRut

@litenibrut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,670subscribers

-117 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002862386872
Type	Channel
Username	@litenibrut
Description	Link in Bio https://beacons.ai/nibrut
Created	Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	18 August 2026
Measurements held	11
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/litenibrut

Growth

11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,652–19,811 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
18 Aug 2026, 12:53	19,670	-10
17 Aug 2026, 12:44	19,680	-14
16 Aug 2026, 06:48	19,694	-15
14 Aug 2026, 16:13	19,709	-21
13 Aug 2026, 05:24	19,730	-16
12 Aug 2026, 08:12	19,746	-14
11 Aug 2026, 09:32	19,760	-9
10 Aug 2026, 06:32	19,769	-16
9 Aug 2026, 03:52	19,785	-8
8 Aug 2026, 05:47	19,793	+6
7 Aug 2026, 17:45	19,787	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 2
Links: 52

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

7,928 reactions across 20 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	4,875	61.5%
🕊	518	6.53%
🔥	398	5.02%
😢	308	3.88%
🥱	212	2.67%
👍	207	2.61%
😭	189	2.38%
👏	172	2.17%
❤‍🔥	109	1.37%
🥰	104	1.31%
🎉	76	0.959%
👌	72	0.908%
🤪	62	0.782%
⚡	59	0.744%
🤯	57	0.719%
👾	46	0.58%
🍾	45	0.568%
🙏	45	0.568%
💔	40	0.505%
🍓	39	0.492%
20 further kinds	295	3.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,928reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received: 850; across the posts below
Posts paid on: 16; of 20 we hold a reading for · 80%
Most on one post: 122; single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @litenibrut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 December 2025 to 7 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Apr 2026, 10:30 UTC≈68,000 views1,002 reactions63 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

• Unlocked Next Track • Unlocked Previous Track • Unlocked Seeking FWD/BWD • Unlocked/Able to Select Any Songs & Albums • Unlocked Repeat All • Unlocked Shuffle • Disabled Force Shuffle • Disabled Audio Ads • Disabled Video Ads • Disabled Visual Ads • Disabled Third-Party Ads • Song lyrics • Работает на всех аккаунтах с меткой и без, если идут скипы треков или не можете войти, смените регион/пароль/vpn как правильно…

❤553🕊258👌57🔥27✍19🍓19👍19💘14

27 Mar 2026, 15:32 UTC≈73,200 views577 reactions7 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

❤371😢70👍39🥰23❤‍🔥17👨‍💻13🔥13🥱12

24 Mar 2026, 14:55 UTC≈63,400 views418 reactions7 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

❤303👏28🥰24🤯13🍾11👍9🔥8🤩7

13 Mar 2026, 12:15 UTC≈70,200 views559 reactions57 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

❤309🥱125🕊38🔥25👏15👍11🌚10❤‍🔥8

6 Mar 2026, 16:33 UTC≈55,100 views720 reactions54 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

❤462🥱75🎉73👍30🕊29🍾12🔥10👾9

19 Feb 2026, 09:58 UTC≈59,800 views857 reactions56 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

❤488🕊146🤪62❤‍🔥37👾32👀30👏30👌11

11 Feb 2026, 12:09 UTC≈59,300 views624 reactions107 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

❤359😢167👏21🔥20👍13🤩12💋9⚡6

5 Feb 2026, 10:35 UTC≈58,700 views464 reactions55 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

❤347⚡30👏22👍12🤯12🆒10🍓9🍾9

1 Feb 2026, 11:16 UTC≈51,300 views348 reactions110 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

❤267👍25👏18❤‍🔥13🔥7🍓5🕊5🤯3

23 Jan 2026, 09:36 UTC≈45,500 views375 reactions52 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

🔥206❤108❤‍🔥18😢12👏8💘7🕊5👍4

14 Jan 2026, 09:55 UTC≈43,800 views352 reactions122 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

❤249🙏45🔥19😱16👍7⚡4💊4🎉3

8 Jan 2026, 16:17 UTC≈43,400 views361 reactions55 Starsread 18 August 2026

File

❤269😘32🔥21😢17❤‍🔥9🍾5👾3🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @litenibrut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,092,522 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

schrodingerspet
@SchrodingerspetOfficial · 1081 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

schrodingerspet
@SchrodingerspetOfficial · 1083 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“by NibRut” (@litenibrut), 19,670 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/litenibrut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.