Пост для тех, кто изучает языки и интересуется переездом за рубеж В папке StudyAbroad собрались лучшие каналы, которые помогут с изучением иностранных языков: Английский Немецкий Французский Нидерландский Китайский Итальянский Также в папке есть каналы, которые объясняют процесс переезда Папка готова к изучению 📚 Забирай всю пользу каналов одним кликом: https://t.me/addlist/noDFRzyJRmEwZTMy

Channel
Listen Here - Английский аудирование
@listenenglishhere
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,608subscribers
-482 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002081375829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @listenenglishhere |
| Description | Номер заявления о регистрации в РКН № 5576576397 Аудирование на английском для уровней A2-B1-B2-С1 Британский и американский юмор. По всем вопросам пишите мне - @yulialapidus Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/listenenglishhere |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/listenenglishhere |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 06:42 | 13,608 | +5 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 08:40 | 13,603 | -7 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:10 | 13,610 | -10 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:09 | 13,620 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:44 | 13,624 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:41 | 13,627 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:35 | 13,632 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:31 | 13,639 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:54 | 13,649 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:54 | 13,657 | -11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 13,668 | -10 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 13,678 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 13,682 | +6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:58 | 13,676 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 13,682 | -18 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 13,700 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 13,709 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:55 | 13,716 | -7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:49 | 13,723 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:05 | 13,729 | first reading |
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.63%
- avg views ÷ 13,608 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 494
- 29 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.875%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 29
- of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (15 July 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,322 |
| Reactions total | 106 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 20:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 718
- Videos
- 13
- Links
- 69
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
571 reactions across 61 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 179 | 31.3% | |
| 👍 | 166 | 29.1% | |
| ❤ | 98 | 17.2% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 6.30% | |
| 🤯 | 29 | 5.08% | |
| 🤩 | 20 | 3.50% | |
| 🤔 | 17 | 2.98% | |
| 😎 | 16 | 2.80% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 1.05% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 0.525% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.175% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 571 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.47%
- 1 of 68 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 601
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 691
- over 67 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 82XWrD8mZVipGEWM9L3VDiDBBDb | 1 | 30 October 2026 | 30 October 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (3.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎓 Мечтаете поступить в зарубежный вуз, выиграть грант и переехать учиться за границу? 🌍 Мы собрали для вас полезную папку с лучшими каналами об образовании за рубежом! ⭐ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ ⭐ Внутри Вы найдёте: 📑 Гранты, стипендии и поступление: актуальные дедлайны, пошаговые инструкции по сбору документов, разборы мотивационных писем и кейсы тех, кто уже поступил на бюджет. ✈️ Учёба и жизнь за границей: чес…
Большинство Telegram-папок живёт один день. А эта может пригодиться на весь путь к поступлению!🌍 Добавили, пролистали, забыли. Знакомо? С International Edu есть повод возвращаться: выбрать язык, найти учебную программу, разобраться с документами или узнать о стипендии. Внутри: 🌍 Образование за рубежом — университеты, учебные программы и поступление. 💰 Стипендии и гранты — возможности получить финансирование на об…
Свет внезапно погас и Гарви спрятался под прилавком, как гласило правило №1. It was cramped beneath there. Boxes of cigarettes, receipt paper, and a small safe left just enough room for me to curl into a ball. The footsteps kept coming. Another set entered, then another, and within less than a minute, the store sounded busy. Cooler doors opened, buttons, candy wrappers crinkled. Something bumped into the chip displ…
👍4
What did the third pair of feet do?
- It stopped in front of the register96%
- It ran away0%
- It started dancing4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3
What was strange about the customers?
- They didn't speak at all87%
- They all ordered coffee9%
- They were singing4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3
How did the feet of the first creature look?
- Gray skin, four long toes, black nails92%
- Wearing high heels6%
- Pink fur2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3
#B2 🐾🐾👋 Гарви забился под кассу, а над ним началась странная ночная жизнь. Холодильники открываются, шуршат обёртки, кто-то задевает стенд с чипсами — но никто не произносит ни слова. Из своего убежища он видит только ноги покупателей. Словарик cramped — тесный, стеснённый curl into a ball — свернуться клубком candy wrappers — обёртки от конфет bumped into — наткнулся на, задел narrow gap — узкая щель scraped softly…
🤔5❤3🤩1
💡 Фраза дня: “To go out” (о свете) Всем привет! В тексте есть очень полезная фраза: The lights went out. Что значит “go out” в этом контексте? Это «погаснуть», «выключиться» (о свете, электричестве). Но у фразового глагола go out есть и другие значения! Примеры: The lights went out during the storm. — Во время грозы погас свет. I’m going out tonight. — Я иду куда-то вечером (в кино, в гости). The fire went out. — О…
👍15
Свет действительно погас. Будет ли Харви соблюдать правила? The silence was actually nice, and then the lights went out. Every single one. The ceiling lights, the coolers, the register, even the lights over the gas pumps outside. The building went completely black. I sighed. Seriously. I reached under the counter for the flashlight, and then I remembered the first rule. For a second, I just stood there. Power out…
👍5❤1
Where did the footsteps come from?
- From the front of the store82%
- From the ceiling3%
- From outside15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3
What did Harvey want to check in the office?
- The breaker89%
- The money5%
- The coffee machine7%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @listenenglishhere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @listenenglishhere as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 27 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 48 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 24 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How did the feet of the first creature look?
- Gray skin, four long toes, black nails92%
- Wearing high heels6%
- Pink fur2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What did the third pair of feet do?
- It stopped in front of the register96%
- It ran away0%
- It started dancing4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What was strange about the customers?
- They didn't speak at all87%
- They all ordered coffee9%
- They were singing4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What did Harvey want to check in the office?
- The breaker89%
- The money5%
- The coffee machine7%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Where did the footsteps come from?
- From the front of the store82%
- From the ceiling3%
- From outside15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What did Harvey reach for under the counter?
- A flashlight89%
- A sandwich3%
- A gun8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@English_Unlock_Slang · 27,969
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
@popenglishLK · 29,232
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@seriesenglishhh · 96,672
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
@monkeypablo · 43,145
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 27 August 2026
@immersion_club · 77,616
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@kurchanov · 23,971
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
@EngWithSongs · 25,077
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 September 2026
@English_Books_TG · 45,376
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
@veryenglink · 55,182
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@englishgrammartesting · 31,523
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@english_mindd · 43,484
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
@state_english · 247,615
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@english_academys · 28,438
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
@english_duolingo · 49,155
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
@englishgalaxy_school · 79,402
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@EnglishByEar · 41,205
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@anglyskyb · 19,283
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 October 2026
@GoEnglishRus · 78,747
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
@english2020easy · 235,714
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@linguatrip_channel · 33,975
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 September 2026
@engl_use · 62,838
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
@anglyskya · 19,698
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 September 2026
@english_easyly · 82,157
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 August 2026
@spaceofeng · 121,913
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Listen Here - Английский аудирование” (@listenenglishhere), 13,608 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/listenenglishhere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.