4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,157–5,165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 12:57
5,164
+6
11 Sept 2026, 14:40
5,158
-1
9 Sept 2026, 06:22
5,159
no change
9 Sept 2026, 05:47
5,159
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 5,164 subscribers
Avg views / post
539
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
20 (9 June 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
539
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
78 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
59
75.6%
👍
15
19.2%
❤🔥
3
3.85%
🥱
1
1.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aider les autres ne doit pas signifier t’abandonner toi-même.
La générosité est une force, mais elle a besoin de limites. Tu ne peux pas construire la stabilité des autres en sacrifiant constamment la tienne.
Apprends à donner sans te vider, à soutenir sans te perdre et à protéger ce que tu as mis du temps à bâtir.
Où dois-tu poser une limite pour continuer à aider sans te mettre en danger ?
@mindset_pdg
#Mindset…
Toute critique n’est pas une vérité.
Certaines personnes projettent simplement ce qu’elles n’ont pas réglé en elles-mêmes.
Ne laisse pas une opinion sans fondement devenir une explication de ta valeur.
Ta cohérence, tes actes et ta paix parlent mieux que les récits inventés à ton sujet.
As-tu appris à ne plus chercher de justification auprès de ceux qui ont déjà choisi de mal te comprendre ?
@mindset_pdg
#Mindse…
Le statut attire les regards. La simplicité révèle les relations.
Il est facile d’impressionner des inconnus. Plus difficile — et bien plus précieux — est de savoir qui reste quand il n’y a rien à montrer.
Ne dépense pas ton énergie à tenir un rôle. Construis une vie qui te laisse libre, lucide et entouré des bonnes personnes.
Qui garderait la même place à tes côtés si les apparences disparaissaient ?
@mindset_pdg…
💡 Prêt à passer au niveau supérieur ?
Télécharge ces 3 pépites + tout notre catalogue en illimité sur notre Telegram VIP ! 📱✨
1. Plus rien ne pourra me blesser (mental d'acier)
2. Power : Les 48 lois du pouvoir (pour ne plus jamais te faire manipuler)
3. Les Lois de la nature humaine (pour lire dans les gens comme dans un livre ouvert)
🎁 Abonnement à vie disponible dès maintenant.
👉 Clique ici : https://bspqwrg…
📚 ÉCHANGE ÉTUDIANT
BD ÉROTIQUE
🌐 François
François, Lorena et sa famille d'accueil découvrent des situations amusantes et délicates illustrant les différences culturelles. L'ambiance légère laisse place à des thèmes plus sérieux, érotique durant leur adaptation.
Retrouvez vos livres de sexualité et BD Érotique ici 👇
Clique ici : https://t.me/+3mPXHWEjzMphZmVk
Contact: @carpes_diems
La meilleure façon d'apprendre est lorsque vous faites quelque chose avec tant de joie que vous ne voyez pas le temps passer. ⏳✨
– Albert Einstein 🧠
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lisonsEnsemble3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝗔𝗺𝗮𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 @amazing_forex_trading · 32,065 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
Film chrétien gospel 🎥™ @Filmschretiengospel · 25,717 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lisons Ensemble 📚✨” (@lisonsEnsemble3), 5,164 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lisonsEnsemble3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
