🈶女🈶房,🉑即上 🫰🫰🫰🫰🫰🫰 👑大圍No.1👑 💰💰💰🈯️定收現金💰💰💰 想睇更多??👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 TG看圖: @lishuiyuan56666 TG預約: @gigili668 電話☎️54442310

Channel
🌸❤️No.1❤️🌸睇图区预约电话54442310
@lishuiyuan56666
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,559subscribers
+205 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001424747174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lishuiyuan56666 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lishuiyuan56666 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:42 | 12,559 | +13 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 12,546 | +12 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 12,534 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 12,532 | +6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 12,526 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 12,533 | +16 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 12,517 | +20 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 12,497 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:23 | 12,494 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 12,487 | +6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 12,481 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 12,482 | +14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 12,468 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 12,469 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 12,475 | +9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 12,466 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 12,465 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 12,470 | +12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 12,458 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 12,456 | first reading |
Engagement
323 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.17%
- avg views ÷ 12,559 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 273
- 100 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 100
- of 323 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 323 (7 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 27,276 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5m 27s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
💕💕萱萱好評,給宣宣一個好評,樣子漂亮身材不錯,服務也很好,很細心,而且健談,女友感滿滿,值得翻吃!👍👍💯💯💯
💕💕小貝好評,非常好 很熱情 我平常都不太多說話 怕說錯或說了不該說的 但這次我說多了一點 說過給她好評100分的 但想想這樣子不夠 我給101分 為什麼多1分 因為好到加01😂😂😂👍👍👍💯💯
❤️❤️❤️芳芳好評👍👍👍 芳芳服務很好,已經找妳n次,一次比一次好,吹功一流,做的時候真反應真水,謝谢妳的介紹,真心的
💕💕芳芳好評 比個好評芳芳,已經翻食無數次,都係咁正,相頭靚,身材廋底大波,服務態度一流,真係每次過來都要搵佢。💕💕👍👍歡迎預約
💕💕木木好評 好少寫好評,但木木必須寫一次,真人仲靚過相,後生真波,又大又軟,下面少做緊緻,女朋友感覺滿滿,非常滿意的一Q 💕💕👍👍歡迎來預約
💕💕木木好評 木木的女孩子也好 她的身材很爆 奶子很大 非常好👍👍👍💯💯💯
💞💞大明星好評,服務好,身材好💞💞 大明星服務很好呀,樣子身材都很美👍 🕹🕹🕹歡迎預約🕹🕹🕹
💞💞木木好評,來當一回AV主角 木木又來了! 這次發現木木笑起來跟A V一樣迷人,彎腰在床邊非常努力😎姿勢和表情也像 A V一樣🥰依舊是胸奴最愛😍 🕹🕹🕹歡迎預約🕹🕹🕹
好評 代號/tg名: N0.1 地區: 大圍 囡名/編號 : 菲菲 家用: $900 + 滿意小費 囡囡樣貌&身材評價 : 8.5/ 10 目測年齡 (20-?/ 21-23/23+) : 23+ 目測波路&係唔係真波 (係/唔係) : 評語 : 真 B波 囡囡服務評價 : 9 / 10 (服務內容、技術 etc.) 女女服務一流, 身材顏值 車牌 (大中細碰碰車) : 評語 : 服務:8.5 /10 耐心等菲菲到步第一個頭鐘,一開門打招呼幾親切,同女女對望,已經想後入就地正法進入佢嘅身體,立即快手先沖涼,女女不忘水蕉,互相挑逗一番,忍唔住即刻抽佢起身大車特車, 女女對答親切,挑起佢嘅情慾反應好正。 一上到床,佢好細心同我按了一陣,直接到主題,簡單吹奏我已經硬晒,直接插入一半繼續引發佢慾望,飢渴嘅表情,個樣睇得出想我大力抽插佢,囡囡話覺得我技巧好,好識屌搞到佢好想要,越屌佢就越濕,因為我用半支棍係咁出出入…
💕💕萌萌好評 萌萌 !服務好,笑容好!帶俾你好多情緒價錢,心情舒暢💕👍👍👍歡迎預約
💕💕芳芳好評 芳芳服務很好,很有女友feel,冇介紹錯 💕💕👍👍歡迎預約
Showing the 12 most recent of 323 posts we hold for @lishuiyuan56666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌸❤️No.1❤️🌸睇图区预约电话54442310” (@lishuiyuan56666), 12,559 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lishuiyuan56666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.