Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for linw1995 自留地

Channel

linw1995 自留地

@linw1995_channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003657984457
TypeChannel
Username@linw1995_channel
Created29 January 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/linw1995_channel

Growth

67 August 2026 — 6 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:456no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:526first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 29 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏240.0%
🤯240.0%
120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 May 2026, 02:58 UTC7 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @im_RORIRI

https://roriri.one/notes/toxical-workplace 新的笔记

6 May 2026, 03:09 UTC44 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

买了 DJI Mic Mini2 来体验下语音 vibe coding。 发现像我这种普通话不标准的人,用键盘打字输入的效率反而是最高的。🤗

🤯2

7 Apr 2026, 07:37 UTC33 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hyi0618

#selected https://blog.zhuangty.com/agent-testing-residual/

25 Mar 2026, 09:17 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @laiskynotes

简单分享下我是怎么花最少的钱,但是又非常重度、高频的依赖 AI coding 的。 我目前的订阅是,最便宜的 copilot 和 codex。这两个的特点在于:codex 是按量付费的,而 copilot 是按次付费的。这个区别是最关键的,如果你更喜欢 cc,那么你可以把本文中的 codex 替换为 cc,一样的逻辑。 而作为 coding,其实工作可以拆分为两大类型,我相信其他大部分文字工作也可以这么拆分: 1. 计划阶段:此时会涉及非常高频交流,但是每次交流的内容都不多,你可以使用 codex 的最高思考模式,写下最核心的关键逻辑 2. 实施阶段:这是广义的实施,包括收集资料、撰写文档、coding、testing、debug 反复调试 都可以视为实施。 copilot 的按次付费,使它成为实施阶段的最佳性价比选择。发送一次 prompt 算一次费用,只要 agent loop 没有结束,期间一切的 tools 调用

24 Mar 2026, 03:32 UTC21 viewsread 12 August 2026

作为助手 AI Copilot 的基本素质 - 自动恢复 - 自动更新 - 进展自动汇报 - 可观测

20 Mar 2026, 13:33 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @fming_weekly

#share https://www.piglei.com/articles/a-simple-ai-coding-guide-for-engineers/

1

12 Mar 2026, 07:48 UTC36 viewsread 12 August 2026

又到了植树节!想和大家一起再种一颗 tgcn 频道树🌳!(这次有更多功能可以玩哦~) 这里是 linw1995 自留地,是 @mmmmmmeowwwww 的树枝 🌿 在频道树的第 5 层~ (如果你也有公开频道,想成为这个频道的树叶的话,就点击下面的「成为树叶」吧! > <) ‎

6 Feb 2026, 11:52 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026

使用好 Coding Agent 三大法则 1. 要提供干净但充足的上下文 2. 要拆解成简单的需求,就是那种 A + B = C 3. 如果生气了,请反思第一点和第二点

31 Jan 2026, 13:14 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

99 plan 两天就快用完一周的额度了。现在升级一下 199 的 plan,99 元套餐就退款了 88 元

30 Jan 2026, 07:55 UTC26 viewsread 12 August 2026

阶段性反馈,只验收结果的 vibe coding 是无法持续的。到后面情绪大于收获(可能是 k2.5 还不够智能)。 准备看代码,重构,上测试。减少掉一些小问题需要人工干涉情况,少些情绪内耗 😭

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @linw1995_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“linw1995 自留地” (@linw1995_channel), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linw1995_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.