Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 沐颜芳

Channel

沐颜芳

@linmuyan0825

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

809subscribers

+285 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004425748702
TypeChannel
Username@linmuyan0825
Created13 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/linmuyan0825

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@linmuyan0825 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@paofuxiaojie123
held 9 August 20269 August 2026

Growth

524823673.59 August 2026 — 524 subscribers9 August 2026 — 530 subscribers17 August 2026 — 624 subscribers25 August 2026 — 637 subscribers26 August 2026 — 692 subscribers27 August 2026 — 730 subscribers2 September 2026 — 818 subscribers10 September 2026 — 823 subscribers19 September 2026 — 809 subscribers8099 August 202619 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 41 days, net +285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 479–868 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:21809-14
10 Sept 2026, 22:38823+5
2 Sept 2026, 17:44818+88
27 Aug 2026, 07:15730+38
26 Aug 2026, 13:31692+55
25 Aug 2026, 00:16637+13
17 Aug 2026, 14:24624+94
9 Aug 2026, 11:31530+6
9 Aug 2026, 09:30524first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.3%
avg views ÷ 809 subscribers
Avg views / post
294
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.221%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held16 (13 June 202626 August 2026)
Views total2,350
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC78 viewsread 26 August 2026

【出击日期】:2026.6.18 【验证人】:靖 【老师艺名】:林沐颜 【老师账号】:@linmuyan616 【地区】:湖里万达 【水费/次】:500 【人照相似】:9.5 【目测年龄】:22 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:9 【服务评分】:10 【情绪价值】:10 【详细描述】:二刷沐颜,第一次都没怎么注意,二刷感觉妹子侧颜更好看了,鼻梁高高的,蛮立体,轮廓上还是有点神似林允的,5米这个价位的颜值,真的算ok了。妹子的确会有点慢热,第一次见面时真的没说几句话我就开始啪了,边啪边上头,话题都是在啪啪中聊开的,二刷一点都不尴尬,马上就有种自来熟的感觉。最喜欢的就是她的配合度,把你当对象一样爱爱,不会像小妹妹那种那么死鱼,真的很迎合,互相爱抚,小嘴巴也很甜,给我整得满头大汗的,畅快! 【总结】:有二刷就还会有三刷,爱爱体验感很好,这个价位很能打! 【总体评分】:9.5 【推荐指数】:★★★★★

26 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC79 viewsread 26 August 2026

【出击日期】:2026.6.16 【验证人】:靖 【老师艺名】:林沐颜 【老师账号】:@linmuyan616 【地区】:湖里万达 【水费/次】:500 【人照相似】:9.5 【目测年龄】:22 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:9 【服务评分】:10 【情绪价值】:10 【详细描述】:刚进房间,就开了厕所灯跟投影仪,整体还是很黑漆漆的,不过小姐姐很可爱,第一眼看有点像林允儿,心想这档次就5米,直接就掏米。服务态度还是不错的,上床后的三点操作让我一度觉得小姐姐很有经验,把我折腾的硬得不得了。起手式还是女上,小姐姐直接来,都不带热身的,鄙人也不虚,试探性的进攻,看看妹子能力如何,总体下来妹子还是蛮耐啪的,很带感,会互摇,来感觉了就会狠狠的夹紧你抱紧你,嘴还特甜,不是在夸你就是在舔你亲你,很主动,试验了好几个姿势,妹子后入应该是不耐的,还是女上舌吻互摇来着舒服。本来跟妹子没聊几句就开啪了,越啪越爱,话都聊开了,很不错,还会再刷。 【总

26 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC181 viewsread 26 August 2026

【出击日期】:826 【验证人】:领养 【老师艺名】:林沐颜 【老师账号】: 【地区】:万达 【水费/次】:500 【人照相似】:8.5 【目测年龄】:21 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:9 【服务评分】:9 【情绪价值】:9 【详细描述】: 颜值: 本人笑起来更好看 身材: B+C,前凸后翘 服务: 认真仔细,很主动, 情绪: 慢热妹妹和奶萌差不多,比奶萌会更好一些,聊开以后无话不谈 【总结】:500,性价比高 【总体评分】:9.5 【推荐指数】:★★★★★

26 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC260 viewsread 26 August 2026

【出击日期】:2026.6.21 【验证人】:靖 【老师艺名】:林沐颜 【老师账号】:@linmuyan616 【地区】:湖里万达 【水费/次】:500 【人照相似】:9.5 【目测年龄】:22 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:9 【服务评分】:10 【情绪价值】:10 【详细描述】:四刷沐颜,六天四刷,足以见得我对妹子的喜爱,要享受当下。今天看妹子有点小憔悴,细聊几番后是没睡好,然后几乎是素颜上班,不过我喜欢妹子,并不只是看妹子的颜值(虽然我觉得她的轮廓有点像林允),而是那种嘟感,在下特地休息了一天后再来跟妹子深入交流。妹子前面跟我硬气了三次,这一次是感觉得到她有点疲惫,整个人已经被我欺负的软趴趴了(床单上留了一片水渍),虽然小声认错,但还是放狠话说你白天来我就不会怂... 好家伙,是在下趁虚而入了,最终还是温柔出货,小心呵护,可不能留下坏印象。虽然妹子今天很疲惫,但还是很照顾我的感受,还问我这样舒服嘛,那样舒服嘛,生怕自己状

26 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC261 views1 reactionsread 26 August 2026

【出击日期】:2026.6.19 【验证人】:靖 【老师艺名】:林沐颜 【老师账号】:@linmuyan616 【地区】:湖里万达 【水费/次】:500 【人照相似】:9.5 【目测年龄】:22 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:9 【服务评分】:10 【情绪价值】:10 【详细描述】:三刷沐颜,已经有点小熟了,小妹妹也更放得开,一听说事后要带她出去吃个夜宵,心情可是好得不得了。即使是多刷,妹子也不偷懒,该有的服务还是会面面俱到。进入正题,就是这种感觉,润软糯,很迎合我,不做作,玩得就是真实,舔咬抱(都是妹子主动自发的来),而且我喜欢的就是这种嘟感,这一晚很尽兴。事后带妹子去吃了她爱吃的日料,没想到湖北妹子还喜欢吃生腌,还是蛮有新鲜感的。 【总结】:适合我的嘟感,有三刷就还会有四刷! 【总体评分】:10 【推荐指数】:★★★★★

1

9 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC29 viewsread 9 August 2026

【出击日期】:8.9 【验证人】:hand_dd 【老师艺名】:泡芙 【老师账号】:@paofu809 【地区】:湖里 【水费/次】:7-1 【人照相似】:8 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:9 【服务评分】:8 【情绪价值】:10 【详细描述】:妹子本人比照片好看,不知道照片是咋拍的,本人看着很舒服,加上妹子有很爱笑很开朗,颜值上确实加分不少。 看照片的时候确实看不出有d奶,进门一看还是挺惊喜的,大大的奶子非常诱人,穿的是修身的连衣裙,虽然腰上有点点肉,架不住颜值和大奶的诱惑,直接交钱开干 洗澡啥的就不说了,衣服脱了后妹子说冷,所以盖着被子开始🐍,🐍很久后我赶紧让她开始干活,不然等会儿时间超了,妹妹口活还行,在嫩妹里算及格以上吧,带套后开干也很配合,就是这床太拉了,稍微动一下就响,所以干了一会儿,我直接转站立厚乳,后面就是抽查抽查直到出水 【总结】:妹子很开朗阳光,情绪价值非常到位,硬件也非常给力。 【总体

9 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026

【出击日期】:2026。8。9 【验证人】:睡觉 【老师艺名】:泡芙 【老师账号】:@paofu809 【地区】:万达 【水费/次】:6 【人照相似】:9 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:8 【服务评分】:8 【情绪价值】:8 【详细描述】:进门一个妹妹挺嫩的。本人更好看一点。交个水费简单冲了一下。弄硬就捅。就淦淦淦淦然后发射成功。表哥三件套就是我。洗澡 出水 跑路 【总结】:羊村出品冲就完事了 【总体评分】:8.5 【推荐指数】:★★★★★

9 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC116 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

宝宝们,可以预约咯 还有少量位置 @paofu809

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @linmuyan0825. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“沐颜芳” (@linmuyan0825), 809 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linmuyan0825.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.