Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 多多家~高端選妹🇹🇼

Channel

多多家~高端選妹🇹🇼

@line_qqt99

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

442subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001851065688
TypeChannel
Username@line_qqt99
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/line_qqt99

Growth

4424444437 August 2026 — 442 subscribers8 August 2026 — 442 subscribers15 August 2026 — 444 subscribers23 August 2026 — 442 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 442–444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 11:56442-2
15 Aug 2026, 19:44444+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:05442no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:38442first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.39%
avg views ÷ 442 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.1
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total408
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC29 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

我想知道 为什么女人这么喜欢替男生口交呢?直到口爆 那些专业女人为什么这么喜欢 【女上男下】这动作呢? 回答:可能想享受那種自我催眠的快感吧 本身是感到不潔和不願的 郤在自我催眠控制自己乖乖地 去舔、去含,去吮啜。。。 用舌頭不停去刺激尿孔 想著將會射 但又以僥倖心態還未射的 我諗是十分刺激的冒險心情 到真的射了又乖乖品嚐和吞下 讓自我催眠將自己變得絕對服從 心情可能變得更爽吧 女上男下最刺激是無套 乖乖地拿著肉棒對準自己的濕穴 慢慢滑入去 有如強姦對方的心態 然後自行上上下下 攬住對方身體濕吻舌頭交纏 貼著對方胸膛磨擦著乳頭和雙乳 到讓全身產生的快感不斷提昇 到了欲罷不能的時候 就只能讓對方內射 有認同的嗎?#點愛心讓我知道

5

7 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

語嫣171/47/C/25歲 #雙北20000 #平面麻豆 長腿比例吸睛,平時兼職平面拍攝,鏡頭前後都充滿自信 熟悉之後卻很好聊天,反差魅力讓人印象深刻 ⭐Gleezy:lin521 📱Line: li26226 📱TG:@ID_52013 🌴 頻道追蹤 一鍵關注全部頻道 營業時間:10:00💡01:00

2

7 Aug 2026, 04:41 UTC27 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

芷妍165/45/C+/24歲 #台中20000 #輕奢系小姐姐 #加節半價 笑起來很甜 修長美腿 喜歡精品、香氛與咖啡 ⭐Gleezy:lin521 📱Line: li26226 📱TG:@ID_52013 🌴 頻道追蹤 一鍵關注全部頻道 營業時間:10:00💡01:00

2

7 Aug 2026, 04:41 UTC20 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

沐顔166/46/D+/24歲 #新竹12000 #平面拍攝 外表甜美,個性卻很有想法,不只是漂亮哦 在床上超反差 超主動 ⭐Gleezy:lin521 📱Line: li26226 📱TG:@ID_52013 🌴 頻道追蹤 一鍵關注全部頻道 營業時間:10:00💡01:00

2

7 Aug 2026, 04:41 UTC20 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

芮恩157/43/C-/19歲 #雙北12000 #氧氣女孩 乾乾淨淨的笑容,總給人一種很舒服的感覺 之後很愛笑,也很喜歡分享生活中的小事 ⭐Gleezy:lin521 📱Line: li26226 📱TG:@ID_52013 🌴 頻道追蹤 一鍵關注全部頻道 營業時間:10:00💡01:00

2

7 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

語嫣171/47/C/25歲 #雙北20000 #平面麻豆 長腿比例吸睛,平時兼職平面拍攝,鏡頭前後都充滿自信 熟悉之後卻很好聊天,反差魅力讓人印象深刻 ⭐Gleezy:lin521 📱Line: li26226 📱TG:@ID_52013 🌴 頻道追蹤 一鍵關注全部頻道 營業時間:10:00💡01:00

2

7 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC30 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

星妤171/49/D/27歲 #雙北10000 #空姐系女神✈️ 乾淨俐落的氣質,加上溫柔笑容,散發成熟又優雅的魅力 給人舒服又甜美的感覺 ⭐Gleezy:lin521 📱Line: li26226 📱TG:@ID_52013 🌴 頻道追蹤 一鍵關注全部頻道 營業時間:10:00💡01:00

2

2 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

晴晴:170/48/C+/25歲 #高雄15000 #長榮空姐 氣質外貌 性感敢玩 膚白貌美 ⭐ lin521 📱 li26226 📱@ID_52013 🌴 頻道追蹤 一鍵關注全部頻道 營業時間:10:00💡01:00

2

2 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC55 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

莎莎:167/C/45/25歲 #雙北18000 #麻豆 配合度高 身體敏感 粉嫩水多 下海短期兼職 服務很主動 ⭐ lin521 📱 li26226 📱@ID_52013 🌴 頻道追蹤 一鍵關注全部頻道 營業時間:10:00💡01:00

2

2 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

芯芯 168/C-/47/25歲 #雙北20000 溫柔大方性格很好相處 貼心會玩會挑逗,奶泡、足交、深喉、品鮑...都可 ⭐ lin521 📱 li26226 📱@ID_52013 🌴 頻道追蹤 一鍵關注全部頻道 營業時間:10:00💡01:00

2

31 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

想跟所有一路陪伴我的哥哥們說一聲謝謝 謝謝你們願意相信我 願意把每一次的安排交給我 願意在我遇到困難的時候拉我一把 謝謝每一位支持過我的人

2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @line_qqt99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,079,502 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“多多家~高端選妹🇹🇼” (@line_qqt99), 442 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/line_qqt99.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.