Channel
@lindasdiary_bgf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003982769988 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lindasdiary_bgf |
| Created | 29 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lindasdiary_bgf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 7 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 7 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
6 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lindasdiary_bgf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 May 2026 to 8 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧸 Interaction. Линда отрабатывала очередную смену в местном кафе. Девушка была одета в рабочую форму, которая состояла из темного фартука и белого сарафана с коротким рукавом. Волчица подобрала к образу темно-серые туфли на небольшом каблуке и завязала копну каштановых волос в пучок для удобства. Когда дверь скрипнула, она стояла возле барной стойки. Ее глаз мгновенно зацепился за необычный наряд незнакомца. Но нео…
Дорогие, порадуйте реакциями, пожалуйста!
📎 Ответы на вопросы. Здравствуйте. Расскажите про ваш любимый напиток и изменились ли со временем вкусы? Как отжигали в молодости? Здравствуйте! Спасибо за вопрос. Из напитков я предпочитаю черный чай (в последнее время часто пью его по утрам, чтобы настроиться на рабочий лад). Ранее, когда я училась в химико-технологическом, в моем списке "любимых напитков" на первом месте стоял крепкий кофе. Но не от того, что он м…
❤2👍2🔥2
📎 Ответы на вопросы. Здравствуй, Линда. Вопрос от независимого журналиста! Как же вам удаётся сейчас решать вопрос по поводу вашей ликантропии и сущностью? До сих пор ли борьба идет? И были ли нападения на людей? Добрый вечер! Спасибо за вопрос. Да, разумеется, борьба идет до сих пор. Ликантропия - довольно сложное состояния (о нем поподробнее расскажу в отдельном посте), даже при наличии средства, которое помогает…
Тема для следующего поста | 🍂
The shares total 182%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🧸 Записки волчицы. 🔠емья Линды. Я довольно редко рассказываю о своей семье. Обычно только то, что мой отец был известным (в своих кругах, разумеется) инженером, а мать - школьным учителем по географии. Пожалуй, именно они привили мне любовь к естественным наукам. Также у меня есть две сестры, Беатрис [Поркс] и Кристина [Поркс], с которыми я стала поддержать связь с недавних пор. Насколько мне известно, после окончан…
🧸 От саппорта. Я добавила ссылку на анкету Линды, если кому-то интересно почитать (в особенности перед взаимодействием). И комментарии в дополнение. Всем добрых снов!
ʟɪɴᴅᴀ's ʀᴇsᴇᴀʀᴄʜ ☕ pinned a photo
🧸 Записи волчицы. Не стоит, Стэнфорд. Что вы планируете делать дальше? Я могла бы.. помочь вам с этим, что бы это ни было. Я уже начала вести наблюдения о новых аномалиях, поэтому я могу поделиться ими с вами. Правда записи остались у меня дома. Ничего?
🧸 Записи волчицы. Мне уже давно ничего не снится. Поэтому, может, я не могу быть настолько полезной в этом вопросе, насколько хотелось бы. Но я всегда готова оказать поддержку. И то, что это как-то помогает, безмерно радует меня. Я налила ему чашку крепкого чая и поинтересовалась, что он думает о новых аномалиях, неожиданно возникших в городе, и имеет ли Билл к ним какое-то отношение по его мнению
🌟 Interaction. Она слегка помахала рукой. — Увидимся, Стэнфорд! - Только проговорила Линда и мгновенно скрылась за пышной листвой деревьев. Диалог со Стэнфордом оставил после себя необыкновенные чувства, которые возникают после встречи с кем-то, кто способен полностью тебя понять
🌟 Interaction. Его теплая улыбка невольно заставила Линду приподнять уголки губ в ответ и поправить сумку на плече. Девушка внимательно слушала его рассказ: о том, насколько удивительный морские просторы, и о появлении новых аномалий в городе. Впрочем, второе ученая заметила еще несколько месяцев назад, но не задумывалась о возникновении этих аномалий. — Да, я тоже подметила это. Заходите ко мне на работу завтра. У…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lindasdiary_bgf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Тема для следующего поста | 🍂
The shares total 182%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 8 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,419,332 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ʟɪɴᴅᴀ's ʀᴇsᴇᴀʀᴄʜ ☕” (@lindasdiary_bgf), 7 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lindasdiary_bgf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.