Channel
@linatheyapper
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
290subscribers
+44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003104069715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @linatheyapper |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/linatheyapper |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 290 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 284 | +38 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 246 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 246 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (20 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 198 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
181 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5228775254385516777 | 69 | 38.1% | |
| custom 5197160571350298672 | 44 | 24.3% | |
| custom 5235451050902693482 | 37 | 20.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 23 | 12.7% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 4.42% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📩я знаю, что много кто любит фанфики почитать вот вам сайт для изучения английского через фанфики, у них ещё приложение есть! :) https://ao3.contextale.com Archive Learning
custom 51971605713502986724❤🔥1custom 52354510509026934821
нет ничего круче вот этого 🫶🫶
custom 522877525438551677713custom 52354510509026934823
с каждым разом разговорный клуб получается все круче !! 🤍 получаю очень приятный фидбэк !!нет лучшей практики, чем разговорная не важно как хорошо вы знаете теорию, грамматические правила и тд, если не можете и не применяете знания на практике. А еще есть риск все напрочь забыть, что это еще обиднее. потому и существуют разговорные клубы :))
custom 523545105090269348210custom 52287752543855167772
💬NEXT SPEAKING CLUB IS ON AUGUST 2ND! topics: Pet peeves in a relationship wlw pop culture — от любимых треков и икон до главных феномнов культуры Интерактивные игры чтобы много-много говорить 🗓 Sunday (2 августа), 16:00 (МСК / UTC+3) ⏱ 1,5 часа 💻 Zoom 💕перед встречей всех добавляю в чат и даю небольшой список слов, после встречи всем персонально высылаю фидбэк :) 💳 Стоимость: $13 (1000₽) 📩 Для записи @g0pissgirl
custom 51971605713502986728custom 52287752543855167773
кстати! в инстаграме тоже имеется некий контент, велкам🫶 ссылка на инст
custom 51971605713502986723custom 52354510509026934823
👀мотивашка для тех, у кого ещё остался вопрос: а зачем мне английский? ну и для тех, кто в какой-то момент мотивашку потерял и не может никак вернуть 👍 и напоминаю, что разговорный клуб это самый лучший способ убрать все языковые барьеры, вперёд @g0pissgirl
custom 522877525438551677711custom 51971605713502986726custom 52354510509026934823❤🔥2🔥2
there goes the first speaking club! 🥰целый час только английского, девчонки огромные молодцы, было очень весело в конце позвала своего друга Нико (из Чили), чтобы поболтали все вместе перед звонком всем раздала vocabulary items, во время клуба делала заметки для каждого 🤍 😶спикинг клуб будет проходить еженедельно (на разные темы), поэтому everyone’s welcome to join
❤🔥10custom 52287752543855167775custom 52354510509026934825
❤️кстати говоря, перед тем как учавствовать непосредственно в спикинг клабе, я с каждой провожу 5-10 минутный созвон, чтобы со всеми познакомиться перед участием, и всем было комфортно. мне прям очень нравится какие крутые девчонки записываются 🥰 lezzz gooo
custom 522877525438551677711custom 51971605713502986723
🏳️🌈WLW SPEAKING CLUB🏳️🌈 ✨july 19th, sunday 16:00 (moscow time), duration: 60 mins ✨the topic is movies, tv-shows, clichés, stereotypes and just life in general. Lots and lots of speaking ✨english-level required: B1-B2 ✨participation price 700₽ ⭐️I’m keeping the group small (5 people max), so everyone feels comfortable and connected 💌contact me to take part!! @g0pissgirl
custom 52287752543855167775❤🔥4custom 51971605713502986722
What’s your english level?
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
кому speaking club будет полезен: 🦋 тем, кому нужно больше разговорной практики 🦋 тем, кому хочется пообщаться на английском на темы, которые действительно интересны 🦋 познакомиться с новыми людьми/networking 🦋 найти study buddy 🦋 тем, у кого недостаточно усидчивости (или времени), чтобы заниматься с репетитором регулярно 🦋тем, кому хочется узнать новое и пополнить словарный запас
custom 522877525438551677710custom 52354510509026934824custom 51971605713502986722
это оригинал
❤🔥3custom 52354510509026934822
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @linatheyapper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What’s your english level?
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
wlw speaking club
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,143,241 of 1,629,372entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“she’s yapping again | lina” (@linatheyapper), 290 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linatheyapper.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.