Channel
FONT 🇵🇸
@limonfont
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,965subscribers
-98 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001581501934 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @limonfont |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/limonfont |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026, 02:10 | 6,965 | -8 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 11:01 | 6,973 | -14 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:36 | 6,987 | -10 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 6,997 | -20 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 7,017 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:19 | 7,024 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 7,025 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 7,034 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 7,045 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 7,049 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 7,051 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 7,051 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 7,052 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 7,056 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 7,063 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@YallaMediaOfficial · 21,923
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 September 2026
@osmmma123 · 25,619
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 14 September 2026
@ArabicFontsForDesign · 20,914
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 September 2026
@designerHomeofficial · 64,659
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
@fotograami · 36,923
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
@FoodofDesigner · 34,563
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
@aalamecom · 21,213
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 September 2026
@TheDesignX · 84,628
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 18 August 2026
@bookss_summary · 121,122
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
@Shutter · 39,279
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
@fontsstore · 268,546
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
@penteamstocks · 19,804
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 September 2026
@ALADWAT · 58,279
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
@Design3A · 26,081
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 September 2026
@designer_bag10 · 30,915
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 6 September 2026
@Saicohat · 24,680
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 15 September 2026
@fyb2020 · 42,192
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@tawzeefy · 54,685
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@khutut07 · 41,554
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 August 2026
@freestockphotos · 20,079
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 September 2026
@MBC5M · 21,956
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
@freepikelements · 20,226
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 28 September 2026
@logomockups · 24,649
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 September 2026
@Mozkrat4prep · 31,671
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FONT 🇵🇸” (@limonfont), 6,965 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/limonfont.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.