Channel
@limengchenxiaowu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,246subscribers
+883 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003969593776 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @limengchenxiaowu |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 6 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/limengchenxiaowu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 1,246 | +832 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 414 | +51 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 363 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 363 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (6 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,894 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
百花名录报告模板 { https://t.me/huaxufengnan } 位置坐标: #深圳 罗湖 验证留名: 云云众生皆平等 上课时间: 8月6日 老师名字: 李梦辰 联系方式: @limengchen666 上课花费: 1400/p 颜值: 9/10 身材: 10/10 胸： 9/10 腰： 10/10 腿： 9/10 服务态度：10/10 爱爱体验： 10/10 情绪价值: 10/10 课室环境: 9/10 人照相似度：9/10 体验过程补充: 李梦辰老师真人比频道照片还要美，身材顶级，腰臀比完美，腿又细又长，胸大小正好，握起来舒服极了，硬件整体上就是一个字嫩，嫩妹一枚，服务课表有的都有，老师情绪价值很到位，进门就拉着你坐到沙发上，抱着你，大眼睛看着你，突然露出的微笑，抚摸着你，和大学女友优谈恋爱的感觉也就这样了，陪浴很细，上了…
❤1
早安。真人真照。今天在线❤️❤️❤️
梦辰魔幻屋🌏 pinned a photo
🎉 💘 七夕心动计划·花间集 × 长安 × 春朝·携四位集美老师助阵七夕福利放送 🎁 奖品内容： • 500现金🧧·中奖联系·@zsjamssbqbot × 1 • 500现金🧧·中奖联系·@Changan68_bot × 1 • 500现金🧧·中奖联系·@youey3 × 1 • P半价🏷️·中奖联系·@chunzi06 × 1 • P500优惠劵·中奖联系·@VproZ2006 × 1 • P400优惠劵·中奖联系·@limengchen666 × 1 ✅ 参与条件： 1. 加入 花间集 2. 加入 深圳长安主频道 3. 加入 春朝频道 4. 加入 广深悠悠 5. 加入 梦辰魔幻屋🌏 6. 加入 小恋の恋手帖🩵 7. 加入 月月资料频道 📝 抽奖说明：开奖后48小时内兑换，逾期作废 ⏰ 开奖时间：2026-08-11 20:52 👇 点击下方按钮参与抽奖
百花名录报告模板 { https://t.me/huaxufengnan } 位置坐标: #深圳 罗湖 验证留名: 苦中作乐 上课时间: 8月5日 老师名字: 李梦辰 联系方式: @limengchen666 上课花费: 1400p 颜值: 10 身材: 10 胸： 9 腰： 10 腿： 10 服务态度：10 爱爱体验： 10 情绪价值: 10 课室环境: 9 人照相似度：9 体验过程补充: 开门一眼到李梦辰感觉就是个皮肤白皙的漂亮老师，小弟弟立刻进入状态硬得飞起。迅速宽衣共浴，梦辰老师全身皮肤保养的很好，水嫩的肌肤亲密接触顺滑细腻。 洗完澡，躺上床，湿润的舌尖在你的身上游走，从胸口到下身。一边 69 品味梦辰娇小的私处一边感受梦辰小嘴吸允着小弟弟，我估计很多狼友到这一步就要投降了。 披上小雨伞先从后面攻入，撞击着老…
❤1
【春朝报告】: http://t.me/Chunzhaobaogao 老师名称：李梦辰 联系方式：@limengchen666 验证留名： 一步看云 上课地点：罗湖 验证时间：8.5 上课价格：1400 老师年龄：20多岁 老师颜值：高颜值，大眼睛。高鼻梁 老师身材：比例正好。 课室环境：环境不错 服务项目：舌吻，陪浴 口活都有 体验： 进门见老师很顺眼，老师很热情。性格很好，整体很满意。皮肤很白。胸大小正好。口活很舒服。女生功夫很棒，后入有臀浪。叫声销魂。做爱很投入。完事跟老师聊天，很健谈。整体很不错。很推荐！ 优点:颜值高。口活好。舌吻投入。对得起这个价位 缺点：暂无
下午好呀
【春朝报告】: http://t.me/Chunzhaobaogao 老师名称：李梦辰 联系方式：@limengchen666 验证留名： 狂暴乐意 上课地点：罗湖 验证时间：8.4 上课价格：1400 老师年龄：00后 老师颜值：五官精致 立体 高颜值 老师身材：身材相当好。比例不错。白皮肤。胸大小正好 课室环境：环境很不错 服务项目：共浴 舌吻 制服等课表有的都有 体验： 老师遥控上楼，进门看见老师第一眼被老师惊艳到了，五官精致。身材比例很好，进门交了课费。老师给我脱下衣服一起洗澡。老师衣服一脱被惊艳到了，胸型很好看。身材比例正好。皮肤很白。洗澡过程中给我口，太有感觉了，完全没有齿感。洗完澡直接把老师抱到床上，开始舌吻，老师舌吻真的太有感觉了。老师舔着我的蛋蛋🥚摸着我的乳头。太舒服了。一会轻轻咬着我的耳根。问我要不要干她，哈。带上套套，插入老师下体，哇下面很紧致。水一会就流出来了。老师女上功夫太棒了，差点被秒了，后入臀浪…
开课中❤️❤️❤️
早安。愿一天美好与你相伴😇😇😇
广深春朝精品榜单 安得一隅，静待花开。 春朝频道 @ChunZhaoChannel 春朝 t.me/+6GThFatodKpjZjll 联系 @aaa_shenbot 免定群原则只邀请春朝群内部推荐优质自聊老师，学生群申请审核制。
开课了！！！
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @limengchenxiaowu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 713,054 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“梦辰魔幻屋🌏” (@limengchenxiaowu), 1,246 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/limengchenxiaowu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.