Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Limbo Trade

Channel

Limbo Trade

@limb_trade

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,725subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002060211695
TypeChannel
Username@limb_trade
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/limb_trade

Growth

1,7251,7531,7397 August 2026 — 1,753 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,753 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,750 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,745 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,741 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,737 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,731 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,727 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,725 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 21 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,721–1,757 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 01:491,725-2
24 Aug 2026, 17:141,727-4
20 Aug 2026, 19:151,731-6
17 Aug 2026, 15:341,737-4
14 Aug 2026, 16:141,741-4
11 Aug 2026, 02:351,745-5
8 Aug 2026, 08:381,750-3
7 Aug 2026, 15:481,753no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:031,753first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 18 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 27s
Average length
3m 27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1333.3%
1025.6%
🔥1025.6%
👏615.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2024 to 31 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2024, 17:38 UTC686 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rektologyVideo

🙂 It's been a killer year for crypto. If you were at least 50% in the game, bagging gains wasn't tough. A whole bunch of life-changing plays rolled through the market. Plus, we dropped tons of alpha on our channels for you For the New Year, we're wishing everyone finds a solid community. Surround yourself with folks who'll help you level up, share the wisdom, and keep the support strong. Even if the millions don't

👍52🔥2

30 Dec 2024, 21:10 UTC493 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rektologyPhoto

📈 DON'T MISS: Bybit #FLOCK launchpool! 🔥 Stake $FLOCK, $MNT or $USDT to obtain a share of 10,000,000 FLOCK for free! How to participate: 🟠Register using this link➡️Bybit HERE 🟠Complete Level 1 verification here 🟠Go to the Bybit Launchpool and choose a token to stake Minimum stake: 200 FLOCK, 100 MNT or 100 USDT 🕖 Period: Dec 31 – Jan 7 🙂 Rektology

👏2👍1

30 Dec 2024, 11:32 UTC645 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

FTX client payouts are set to start this Friday, January 3rd, 2025. Limbo Trade

👍2

27 Dec 2024, 09:36 UTC434 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Feeling like we’re at the precipice of Trump sending a $PEPE signal 😂 Limbo Trade

🔥1

24 Dec 2024, 11:56 UTC280 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Pepe chart on Coinbase – deviation up, deviation down Classic shakeout vibes 🥂 Limbo Trade

👍1👏1

23 Dec 2024, 13:17 UTC255 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🥂 Market thoughts: I’m expecting the next rally wave to hit around Jan 11-13. After that, we could see some serious shakeouts around inauguration (Jan 20). From there, the strongest moves of this cycle should run through the end of Q1 2025, maybe even stretching into April-May if we’re lucky. Stablecoins from recent exits – keep them ready for the January dip. It could hit harder than what we saw last week. If the

1👍1

23 Dec 2024, 09:26 UTC183 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

GM 🤔 Just a reminder, frens – past cycle lows for alts vs BTC: • ETH/BTC – Hit the floor on Dec 27, 2020 • AAVE/BTC – Tapped out on Jan 3, 2021 • SOL/BTC – Bottom vibes on Dec 27, 2020 • BNB/BTC – ATL vibes on Jan 8, 2021 • AVAX/BTC – Dug deep on Dec 30, 2020 History don’t lie – smart money bought the dip. Eyes peeled for those retests, fam. The next cycle’s setup is brewing 💥 Limbo Trade

2🔥2👍1👏1

21 Dec 2024, 17:55 UTC180 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The retail bros from Reddit are battle-tested and leveling up after their first dip 😂 🚨 3.37% of $PEPE supply scooped by Robinhood users since listing 36 days ago 👀 Limbo Trade

👏21🔥1

20 Dec 2024, 14:36 UTC198 viewsread 7 August 2026

We’ve got some solid catalysts ahead: ▶️ In January, FTX is starting payouts to clients, which will bring fresh liquidity into the market. And not just institutional liquidity - retail is coming back, too. ▶️ For the first time ever, we’ve got a super pro-crypto US administration. If big players are moving their operations to the States, you know they see the long-term potential. These guys don’t gear up at the en

20 Dec 2024, 13:54 UTC224 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Yo, fam! Just been scrolling through the chats today, and honestly, it feels like everyone’s panicking - like we’re living through another FTX collapse or something. But listen up: if you’ve been around for a few cycles, you know this is just how the market vibes. One moment it’s “Lambo time,” and the next it’s “Guess I’m flipping burgers at McDonald’s.” Totally normal 😂 So why’s everyone freaking out? It’s because

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @limb_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 266,983 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Limbo Trade” (@limb_trade), 1,725 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/limb_trade.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.