Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌◜ ‌百合💭

Channel

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌◜ ‌百合💭

@lily_dol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

858subscribers

+78 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002873648590
TypeChannel
Username@lily_dol
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lily_dol

Growth

7808588196 August 2026 — 780 subscribers6 August 2026 — 786 subscribers6 August 2026 — 786 subscribers13 August 2026 — 858 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 768–870 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:34858+72
6 Aug 2026, 15:34786no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:43786+6
6 Aug 2026, 08:19780first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
138.7%
avg views ÷ 858 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total14,276
Reactions total628
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,215 reactions across 18 posts, in 58 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 521333740675689887512610.4%
custom 54204018903807801421088.89%
custom 5262528470356893941937.65%
custom 5355221569775872769907.41%
custom 5267159759361943716867.08%
🎉836.83%
custom 5287248592715671296816.67%
custom 5825738552767421388524.28%
custom 5341615551468832095483.95%
custom 5406842369389657828433.54%
custom 5291792500611118355423.46%
custom 5263009223226204763352.88%
💘342.80%
custom 5341642510978548273292.39%
custom 5422840718840313816201.65%
custom 5341330142302082814191.56%
custom 5422615632489235102151.23%
custom 5244827269452564264141.15%
custom 5282804078953393615141.15%
custom 5888760965838677853141.15%
38 further kinds16913.9%

Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lily_dol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC50 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Why is no one supporting me? Has my art gotten that bad? 😭😭

custom 52917925006111183557custom 53413301423020828142custom 53416155514688320952

6 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC157 views53 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🍰

custom 529179250061111835535custom 53413301423020828148custom 53416155514688320955custom 534164251097854827341

4 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC267 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53416155514688320956custom 53008662675639928442

4 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC266 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

هنوز اسکچش کامل نیست جهت اینکه من زندم خیلیا داشتن ترک میکردن گذاشتمش

custom 534164251097854827315custom 53416155514688320953custom 58257385527674213883custom 53008662675639928441

4 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC406 views72 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Wip

custom 582573855276742138848custom 53416155514688320959custom 53416425109785482737custom 53008662675639928444custom 53413301423020828144

31 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC≈2,030 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩hallenge 💖🎀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Forward this message to your channel, and I'll boost one person's channel and give two people a chibi art🌟 Join Lexea's and Lily's channels!🎀

custom 534161555146883209523custom 58345914939767593876custom 53008662675639928445custom 53413301423020828145custom 53416425109785482733

Signed Лексия

26 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC≈1,530 views106 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

collab with my pookie 🍰

custom 528724859271567129678custom 521333740675689887513custom 54248302593609756318custom 54224719830130626205custom 54226156324892351022

26 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC969 views74 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 521333740675689887554custom 542261563248923510211custom 52197978750887052103custom 52872485927156712963custom 54248302593609756313

23 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC≈4,830 views88 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

────୨🍥ৎ──── peedpaints anonymous Daily Commission ────࣪─ ─────

custom 521333740675689887559custom 538215617727249001611custom 54227343539752342239custom 52468787820563379903custom 54204830996223954862custom 54226156324892351022custom 54228520274892085422

18 Jul 2026, 22:35 UTC≈1,170 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 58887609658386778538

18 Jul 2026, 22:29 UTC≈2,550 views144 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🍰

custom 5420401890380780142108custom 524482726945256426414custom 52630092232262047637custom 58887609658386778536custom 52042268319343138514custom 52695171294717846813custom 50531821522130060062

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lily_dol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 14,924 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌◜ ‌百合💭” (@lily_dol), 858 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lily_dol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.