Channel
@lilik1997
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
406subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001640353698 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lilik1997 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lilik1997 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:39 | 406 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 407 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 409 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 409 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
49 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 91.8% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 8.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кажется, пора выходить из сумрака 🥹 За время моего отсутствия от меня отписалось довольно много человек, но я надеюсь, что остались и те, кто будет рад меня читать снова 🤍 Привет, дорогие, буду наверстывать все упущенное ✨🫶🏻 Анечке, кстати, уже 1.9г!
❤22
Девочки, отрываю от сердца онлайн магазин моей лучшей подруги, в котором можно заказать ныне популярную косметику по очень привлекательным ценам 🤍 Мои фавориты: ✨ Сыворотка с ниацинамидом The Ordinary, единственный ниацинамид, который мне подошел, пользуюсь несколько лет; ✨Тонер Celimax; ✨Оба крема Dr.Althea — 147 и 345. Очень лёгкие и не забивают поры. Взяла на пробу стик от Medipeel для шеи и ещё жду прикольные с…
❤4
Всем привет 🤍💌 Мы что-то совсем потерялись, простужаемся всей семьей по очереди и не можем выбраться из круговорота этой хвори. Из интересного: скоро у Ани появится её рабочее место. Долго откладывала это дело, но вчера точно решила, что пора что-то выбрать и заказать. У ровесников уже есть, а у нас по прежнему камыш 😂 Размышляла сто лет, но по итогу заказала первый вариант. Столик и стульчик с третьего скрина мне…
🥰4❤2
7 апреля мы отметили Анечке полтора года 🤍 Наверняка многие уже видели это в запрещенной сети, но захотела оставить и тут :) ⬇️Что имеем к полторашному возрасту: — период «я сама». Психует, злится и убирает наши руки, если помогаешь ей самой есть, залазить куда-то, одеваться и прочее; — залазит на все стулья, столы, лихо шагает по всем лестницам на улице, но спускаться по ним не умеет; — активная сюжетно-ролевая иг…
❤11
Мои фавориты последних недель марта 🌸🤩🌟 🤍 утром всегда под рукой книга со стихами о семье, своего рода поддержка на день и напоминание о главном богатстве в жизни; 🤍искала гель для душа в минималистичной бутылке и взяла эти [фото 2], очень приятные ароматы, которые держатся на коже и в ванной комнате дольше, чем обычно; 🤍скептически отношусь к d’Alba, мне кажется их пиар-кампании лучше, чем их составы, но патчи мне …
❤6
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @lilik1997. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liliya — материнство/находки/обзоры” (@lilik1997), 406 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lilik1997.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.