Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for likaray

Channel

likaray

@likaobbeauty

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

4,950subscribers

-246 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002158136507
TypeChannel
Username@likaobbeauty
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/likaobbeauty

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,9505,1965,0737 August 2026 — 5,196 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,196 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,190 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,170 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,153 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,134 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,113 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,094 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,076 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,052 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,028 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,996 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,961 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,950 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net -246. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,913–5,233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 06:164,950-11
11 Sept 2026, 05:154,961-35
6 Sept 2026, 02:584,996-32
1 Sept 2026, 18:465,028-24
29 Aug 2026, 22:245,052-24
27 Aug 2026, 06:255,076-18
24 Aug 2026, 16:245,094-19
20 Aug 2026, 22:355,113-21
17 Aug 2026, 12:235,134-19
14 Aug 2026, 13:145,153-17
11 Aug 2026, 09:035,170-20
8 Aug 2026, 08:505,190-6
7 Aug 2026, 17:315,196no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:275,196first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 8 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

928 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
55559.8%
🔥16918.2%
849.05%
👌737.87%
😢475.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 928 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 19 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 8 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @likaobbeauty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2026 to 19 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Mar 2026, 12:45 UTC≈3,400 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

после разбора косметики, я оставила те продукты которыми я постоянно пользуюсь и которые покупаю уже не раз, возвращаясь к ним снова и снова а остальное просто лежит, забавно, ведь на «остальное» ушло столько денег, поэтому покажу несколько моих любимчиков, чтобы вы не столкнулись с такой проблемой — revolution skin silk (легкий тон-сыворотка, но с хорошим перекрытием + натуральный финиш) — physicians formula bronz

42🔥85

18 Mar 2026, 16:20 UTC≈3,150 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

я сегодня перебирала свою косметичку и поняла, что по факту у меня куча средств, но я пользуюсь максимум 5–6, а остальное просто лежит если покупать всю косметику без разбора, только по рекомендациям вашей ленты, то именно так все и будет самое интересное, что пользуюсь я даже не самыми дорогими продуктами..а теми, которые реально работают на моей коже просто понимаю, что выбросила столько денег на ветер и ненужн

57🔥1612

16 Mar 2026, 10:59 UTC≈3,320 views155 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

есть одна большая проблема при выборе косметики 🤩🧴 многие покупают косметику вслепую, без отзывов, не учитывая свой тип кожи, а так же рассчитывают на то, что дорогой продукт = безупречное качество, но это не всегда так поэтому сейчас я собираю список из 100+ проверенных продуктов, которые реально работают и доступны для разных бюджетов я готовлю полноценный гайд : 🤍тон 🤍консилер 🤍скульптор 🤍румяна 🤍пудра 🤍хайлай

106🔥3316

12 Mar 2026, 12:04 UTC≈4,120 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

как многие заметили, я постригла волосы. это было очень спонтанное решение, о котором, к слову, я совсем не жалею поэтому сегодня будет видео, где мы вместе сделаем впервые на мою новую стрижку укладку так что не теряйте меня, я все ещё тут (тык). в тик ток выложу видео про укладку !!

😢4736🔥81

10 Mar 2026, 13:30 UTC≈3,550 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

тестировала в последнее время какой-то новый для себя уход и могу порекомендовать два продукты • крем for me • молочная сыворотка тонер for me крем довольно плотный и очень хорошо увлажняет. я бы даже его сравнила с кремом lagom (ссылка на пост). а вот сыворотку тонер я бы даже сравнила с молочным тонером от celimax, который взорвал интернет. мне очень нравится как сияет кожа, ну получается даже более доступный ана

🔥3512👌32

10 Mar 2026, 10:54 UTC≈3,500 views146 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

радуюсь цветочкам от моего любимого парня, а ещё попробуйте заметить, что во мне изменилось..) пишите в комментариях, как проходит начало весны и ожидайте в ближайшее время больше постов 🥹

👌6655🔥241

8 Mar 2026, 14:21 UTC≈3,670 views175 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

любимые вкусняшки от любимого. ещё раз всех красоток с восьмым марта 🥹 а у нас по плану фильмы, тортик и эклеры

11727🔥27👌4

8 Mar 2026, 12:24 UTC≈3,720 views168 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

дорогие девушки, мои любимые подписчицы ! поздравляю вас всех с 🩷 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 желаю всем прекрасного настроение в этот и другие дни, чтобы улыбка на ваших лицах никогда не спадала 🩷 а я наслаждаюсь цветочкам от семьи и моего самого любимого парня. прекрасный день, который я рада провести с самым близким человеком. всем хорошего дня и красивых цветочков

13020🔥18

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @likaobbeauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“likaray” (@likaobbeauty), 4,950 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/likaobbeauty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.