Как проходят мои выходные:
❤🔥5custom 52517541454629019225custom 51882621636171856504custom 53707030499772488692💘1custom 59812661046039064611

Channel
@lika_Frost_book
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001828891741 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lika_Frost_book |
| Description | Ютуб : https://youtube.com/@lika_frost?si=-Dezep_tosNQSA2h |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lika_Frost_book |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:50 | 27 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
197 reactions across 15 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 55 | 27.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 28 | 14.2% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 5.58% | |
| custom 5188262163617185650 | 9 | 4.57% | |
| custom 5192959294470895031 | 9 | 4.57% | |
| custom 5447444314441403510 | 9 | 4.57% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 4.06% | |
| custom 5371087574104290489 | 7 | 3.55% | |
| ☃ | 7 | 3.55% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 3.55% | |
| custom 5251754145462901922 | 5 | 2.54% | |
| custom 5370680398319727378 | 5 | 2.54% | |
| custom 5370703049977248869 | 4 | 2.03% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.03% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 2.03% | |
| custom 5363938656874673963 | 3 | 1.52% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.52% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 1.52% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.52% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 1.52% | |
| 7 further kinds | 10 | 5.08% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 10 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lika_Frost_book. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 January 2026 to 10 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Как проходят мои выходные:
❤🔥5custom 52517541454629019225custom 51882621636171856504custom 53707030499772488692💘1custom 59812661046039064611
Девочки, всех с праздником 💐💐💐
🔥7custom 51929592944708950315custom 53710875741042904891
🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺 8⃣ 🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺 Начала перечитывать мою любимую Пенелопу Дуглас и ее цикл "Потерянная дружба" И именно сегодня я добралась к своей самой любимой части 🥰☺️
❤🔥4custom 51929592944708950314custom 53639386568746739633
Сара Кейт "Похвали меня" Решили мы как-то с подругой устроить совместные чтения Сары Кейт (скажу сразу, хватило нас на две книги 🫣😁) Вообще не моя история. Не зацепила абсолютно ничем. Больше наверно даже отрицательные эмоции вызывала при прочтении. (Но на вкус и цвет как говорится ) Трек ЛСП "Шиншиллы" некоторыми строчками очень напомнили данную книгу 😁
❤🔥6🔥3😁3💋1
Тик ток подъехал о наболевшем 🫣😁 Не знаю сколько нужно еще перечитать книг про сводных, чтобы зацепила так же как "Дорогой сводный братец"
❤🔥6😍5🔥3😱1custom 53710875741042904891
Channel photo updated
Долго решалась, но все же решилась 😂 Чтож поехали, первая часть огромного цикла "Академия Зодиак"
🔥5🤩4😎3😈2custom 51882621636171856501
Как же сильно я хотела эту раскраску 🐉🐉 Угадайте, чем я займусь в выходные дни? 🫣😏
custom 54474443144414035109🔥6custom 51882621636171856504🦄1
Тот, кто подписан на мой TikTok, знает, что я обещала розыгрыш. И вот он! Дарю книгу Runyx «Хищник». Условия: 1. Быть подписанным на мой канал «Голая в красном». 2. Написать в комментариях свой порядковый номер. За репост на свой канал +1 номерок. 3. Ждать результатов 20 февраля. Пусть горячий дарк роман растопит ваше сердце. С любовью, Голая в красном 💋
🔥3
Мечта 😍 (Дорогая очень мечта конечно) Обожаю мультик witch , буквально в декабре пересматривала 😁 Очень хотела бы все изданные книги себе, но пока я не миллионер, чтобы их купить 😆
🔥6❤🔥3😨2🦄1
Всем привет)) Вот и началась первая рабочая неделя 2026г. 😓 Рада ли я этому? Конечно же нет. Рассказывайте как проходит ваш первый рабочий день ?)
custom 53710875741042904895🥰4custom 53706803983197273784❤🔥1😁1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥9🤣2custom 53706803983197273781custom 53707030499772488691
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lika_Frost_book. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lika_Frost 🫦” (@lika_Frost_book), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lika_Frost_book.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.