Channel
@lighthouse_selfgrowth
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
133subscribers
+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003091254023 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lighthouse_selfgrowth |
| Description | رشد شخصی با نگاهی علمی و سبک زندگی هوشمندانه ✨ اینستاگرام: instagram.com/lighthouse_selfgrowth ارتباط با ادمین: @LH_MediaTeam |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lighthouse_selfgrowth |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 133 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 133 | +34 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 99 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,137 |
| Reactions total | 80 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
80 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 32 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 31.3% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 12.5% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 11.3% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 3.75% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔖 چکلیست «هزینههای پنهان تصمیم» هر بار که از انتخاب گزینهای مطمئن نبودی، دوباره این سوالها رو مرور کن تا ابعاد نامرئی تصمیمت رو هم بررسی کنی🔥 📚 منابع: Chip Heath & Dan Heath (2013). Decisive: How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work. 🌊 LIGHTHOUSE #پوستر_آموزشی
💯3
هزینههای پنهان تصمیمگیری‼️ 💵 اغلب ما هنگام تصمیمگیری فقط به پول، زمان یا نتیجه فکر میکنیم؛ در حالی که پژوهشهای روانشناسیِ تصمیمگیری نشون میدن هر تصمیم میتونه هزینههای نامرئی دیگهای هم داشته باشه که اگه نادیده گرفته بشن، کیفیت تصمیم رو کاهش میدن. 💬 تو معمولا توی تله کدوم هزینهی نامرئی میوفتی؟ فدا کردن روابط، از دست دادن فرصتهای بهتر یا...؟ ⏳ امروز قراره با هم بررسیشون کنیم... 🌊 LIGHTHOUSE
👌3
آخر هفتهتون بخیر باشه 🔥☕️ 🌊 LIGHTHOUSE
❤2🔥2👎1🕊1
📊 ببینیم کدوم گزینه به تفکر سیستمی نزدیکتره؛ ◼️ گزینه 1: بیشتر دنبال کنترل نتیجهای تا پیدا کردن علت. ⏰ آلارم بیشتر شاید یکی دو روز جواب بده، ولی اگر دلیل اصلی دیر بیدار شدنت سر جاش باشه، احتمالاً مشکل دوباره برمیگرده. پس از خودت بپرس: «اصلاً چرا به آلارم دوم و سوم نیاز پیدا میکنم؟» ◽️ گزینه 2: اراده برات مهمه، اما همیشه کافی نیست! 🔮 تلاش بیشتر ارزشمنده، ولی اگر شرایطت مثل قبل باشه، فقط به اراده تکیه کردی. گاهی …
💯6
فرض کن هر روز دیر از خواب بیدار میشی و بهموقع به سر کار یا دانشگاه نمیرسی. به نظرت کدوم روش بیشتر جواب میده؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سه کتابی که برای ساختن یه ذهن قوی باید بخونی: ① ذهن پیشاهنگ (The Scout Mindset) ✍🏻 جولیا گالف (Julia Galef) 💡 این کتاب کمک میکنه خطاهای شناختی، تعصبها و قضاوتهای عجولانه رو بهتر بشناسی و تصمیمهای دقیقتر بگیری. ② تفکر نامطمئن (Thinking in Bets) ✍🏻 آنی دوک (Annie Duke) ♟ زندگی مثل شطرنج نیست؛ بیشتر شبیه پوکره. حتی بهترین تصمیمها هم همیشه بهترین نتیجه رو ندارن. و این کتاب، یکی از بهترینها برای یادگیری تصمیمگیر…
🔥3💯2
🎬 پیشنهاد این هفته | The Butterfly Effect 🤔 تا حالا شده بخوای تصمیمات زندگیت رو عوض کنی؟ به پیامدهای هر تصمیم فکر کردی؟ تا حالا با خودت گفتی «اگر تصمیم متفاوتی میگرفتم، زندگیم چه تغییری میکرد؟» 🦋 فیلم اثر پروانهای دقیقاً درباره همینه. داستان پسریه که میتونه برگرده به گذشته و بعضی از تصمیمهاش رو عوض کنه. اما هر بار که فکر میکنه همهچیز درست شده، یه گوشهی دیگه از زندگیش به هم میریزه. 🔄 این فیلم نشون میده که…
🔥3❤2🕊1
به جمع ما خوش اومدین🔥 اگه دنبال تکنیکهای سریع و کاربردی هستی، جای درستی اومدی. هدف ما اینه با استفاده از مطالب علمی و معتبر: 🎯 تکنیکهای موفقیت رو بشناسیم و خطاهای رایج رو تحلیل کنیم. ♟ در بحرانها و شرایط سخت هوشمندانهتر عمل کنیم. 🏆 برای رشد شخصی و حرفهای، یک سیستم پایدار بسازیم؛ نه اینکه فقط به انگیزه تکیه کنیم. 🖇 برای دسترسی سریع به مطالب، از هشتگهای زیر استفاده کن: #خلاصه_کتاب #مقاله_تحلیلی #پوستر_آموزشی #چ…
❤5🔥1🕊1
همهی خستگیها با استراحت برطرف نمیشن‼️ اگه بعد از یک خواب خوب هم احساس خستگی میکنی، شاید مشکل فقط کمبود خواب نباشه! ⚠️ ما معمولاً به اشتباه فکر میکنیم تنها راه بازیابی انرژی، خواب بیشتر و باکیفیته. ❌ اما مشکل فقط انرژی جسمی نیست. تصمیمهای زیاد، تمرکز طولانیمدت، استرس و استفادهی مداوم از صفحهنمایش هم انرژی ذهنی رو کاهش میدن؛ حتی اگر از نظر جسمی به اندازهٔ کافی استراحت کرده باشی. ✅ همهی استراحتها شبیه هم…
❤6
💡 تصمیمگیرندههای خوب، بیشتر انرژیشون رو صرف دایره نفوذ میکنن. چون هر تصمیمی که در اون حوزه میگیرن، احتمال تغییر واقعی رو بیشتر میکنه. از امروز، هر وقت با یک تصمیم روبهرو شدی، فقط یک سؤال بپرس: «دارم برای چیزی انرژی میذارم که میتونم تغییرش بدم، یا فقط دارم روی چیزی وقت میذارم که قدرت تغییرش رو ندارم؟» 📚 منابع: Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. 🌊 LIGHTHOUSE #پوستر_آموزشی
❤3💯2
🧠 خستگی فقط انرژی بدن رو کم نمیکنه؛ روی کیفیت فکر کردن هم اثر میگذاره. ذهن در شرایطی که انرژی ما تحلیل میره، معمولاً به سراغ راهحلهای سریع و کمهزینه میروه، حتی اگر بهترین گزینه نباشن❗️ 🔅 به همین دلیل، مدیریت انرژی فقط برای افزایش بهرهوری نیست؛ بلکه یکی از ابزارهای مهم برای تصمیمگیری بهتره. 🌊 LIGHTHOUSE
❤1💯1
وقتی احساس خستگی میکنی، معمولاً اولین چیزی که تحلیل میره چیه؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lighthouse_selfgrowth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
فرض کن هر روز دیر از خواب بیدار میشی و بهموقع به سر کار یا دانشگاه نمیرسی. به نظرت کدوم روش بیشتر جواب میده؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
وقتی احساس خستگی میکنی، معمولاً اولین چیزی که تحلیل میره چیه؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❓به نظرت این روزها بزرگترین چیزی که انرژیت رو میگیره چیه؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 113,348 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lighthouse” (@lighthouse_selfgrowth), 133 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lighthouse_selfgrowth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.