Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Life_yegan_project

Channel

Life_yegan_project

@life_yegan_project

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

42,072subscribers

+15,243 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002461921924
TypeChannel
Username@life_yegan_project
Descriptionجهت سفارش ادیت لطفا به این آیدی پیام بدید @life_yegann
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/life_yegan_project

Topic

Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

29,900 average views per post against 42,072 subscribers — an engagement rate of 71.2%. Across the 24,485 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,991 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.62% and 15.2%, with a median of 6.82%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (12 August 2026 11 September 2026)
Posts measured10 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 10 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled299,400
Mature posts only71.2% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers42,072 measured 11 September 2026
Cohortb31623 · 24,485 channels · p10 0.829% · p25 2.62% · p50 6.82% · p75 15.2% · p90 27.6%
Position in cohort99.216th percentile · 10.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.03% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 11 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

26,82942,07234,450.57 August 2026 — 26,829 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,829 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,858 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,870 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,884 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,909 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,896 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,900 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,910 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,968 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,888 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,925 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,009 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,045 subscribers21 August 2026 — 27,060 subscribers22 August 2026 — 27,128 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27,255 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,281 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,322 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,368 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,412 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,485 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,547 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,605 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,624 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,629 subscribers3 September 2026 — 27,617 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,631 subscribers8 September 2026 — 27,661 subscribers11 September 2026 — 42,072 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 34 days, net +15,243. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,543–44,358 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 00:5842,072+14,411
8 Sept 2026, 04:1727,661+30
4 Sept 2026, 20:5627,631+14
3 Sept 2026, 07:4927,617-12
2 Sept 2026, 05:0527,629+5
1 Sept 2026, 08:1527,624+19
31 Aug 2026, 09:2527,605+58
30 Aug 2026, 10:2827,547+62
29 Aug 2026, 13:1427,485+73
28 Aug 2026, 10:3627,412+44
27 Aug 2026, 09:0827,368+46
26 Aug 2026, 10:0227,322+41
25 Aug 2026, 12:3227,281+26
24 Aug 2026, 15:1427,255+127
22 Aug 2026, 20:2727,128+68
21 Aug 2026, 12:4227,060+15
20 Aug 2026, 12:3427,045+36
19 Aug 2026, 11:2627,009+84
18 Aug 2026, 08:5626,925+37
17 Aug 2026, 09:5826,888first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.5%
avg views ÷ 42,072 subscribers
Avg views / post
31,400
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.226%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held31 (20 June 20269 September 2026)
Views total313,600
Reactions total708
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
38
Videos
15
Links
82

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 29s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,859 reactions across 29 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,40275.4%
😍19910.7%
👌1176.29%
🤔502.69%
🔥261.40%
🗿241.29%
🤷‍♀201.08%
🤷100.538%
🐳60.323%
😎50.269%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,859 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 10:16 UTC≈28,700 views77 reactionsread 11 September 2026

دوستان عزیزی که نتونستین عکس دهه ۸۰ رو بسازین میتونید به این آیدی سفارش بدید براتون میسازن (رایگان نیست) سفارشات دیگه ای هم اگر داشتین ویدیو ، عکس ، روتوش و ... همگی رو میتونید به این آیدی بدید @life_yegann

40🗿19🤔18

9 Sept 2026, 07:08 UTC≈31,000 views24 reactionsread 11 September 2026

دوستان عزیزم جهت انجام تبلیغات در کانال تلگرام ما میتونید به این آیدی پیام بدید @life_yegann

16😍8

8 Sept 2026, 19:21 UTC≈34,100 views81 reactionsread 11 September 2026

دوستان پرامپت دهه های مختلف بالاست روی پیام پین شده بزنید به ترتیب میتونید کپی کنید و استفاده کنید 😍

67👌9😍5

8 Sept 2026, 19:03 UTC≈35,100 views118 reactionsread 11 September 2026

پرامپت دهه ۵۰ Transform this photo into an authentic 1950s-era portrait while preserving the person’s identity with absolute accuracy. IMPORTANT: Keep the face EXACTLY the same as the reference image. Do not alter, beautify, reshape, age, de-age, or reinterpret the facial features in any way. Preserve the exact facial structure, proportions, skin tone, eye shape, eyebrows, nose, lips, jawline, cheekbones, smile, and

101😍8🤔3🐳2👌2🤷2

8 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC≈32,800 views74 reactionsread 11 September 2026

پرامپت دهه ۷۰ Transform this photo into an authentic 1970s-era portrait while preserving the person’s identity with absolute accuracy. IMPORTANT: Keep the face EXACTLY the same as the reference image. Do not alter, beautify, reshape, age, de-age, or reinterpret the facial features in any way. Preserve the exact facial structure, proportions, skin tone, eye shape, eyebrows, nose, lips, jawline, cheekbones, smile, and

65👌3😍3🗿2🤔1

8 Sept 2026, 19:01 UTC≈31,800 views101 reactionsread 11 September 2026

پرامپت دهه ۸۰ <Transform this photo into an authentic 1980s-era portrait while preserving the person’s identity with absolute accuracy. IMPORTANT: Keep the face EXACTLY the same as the reference image. Do not alter, beautify, reshape, or reinterpret the facial features in any way. Preserve the exact facial structure, proportions, skin tone, eye shape, eyebrows, nose, lips, jawline, cheekbones, and all distinctive f

94👌3😍3🤔1

8 Sept 2026, 18:58 UTC≈31,700 views102 reactionsread 11 September 2026

پرامپت دهه ۶۰ Transform the reference photo into an authentic 1950s-era portrait while preserving the person’s identity with absolute accuracy. IMPORTANT: Keep the face EXACTLY the same as the reference image. Do not change, beautify, reshape, or reinterpret the facial features. Preserve the exact facial structure, proportions, skin tone, eye shape, eyebrows, nose, lips, jawline, cheekbones, smile, and every distinc

85😍15👌2

8 Sept 2026, 18:21 UTC≈28,300 views62 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

دوست دارید شماام از این مدل عکس ها بسازید؟ آموزشش اینجاست 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdCTjbeObdL/?stkn=OG8za2J1OXd4dmx1 پرامپت همه دهه هارو براتون همینجا میذارم 😍

43👌11😍8

16 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈33,100 views69 reactionsread 11 September 2026
File

📱 نسخه بدون مشکل کپ کات 19.5📱 💎 بدون ارور تمپلیت و افکت 💎 رفع مشکل تمپلیت ✅ رفع باگ های نسخه قبلی ✅ حل مشکل کرش کردن برنامه ✅ بهینه شدن افکت های هوش مصنوعی ✅ فعال کردن تمپلیت فقط با یه دکمه ✅ حذف شدن Watermark تمپلیت ✅ اضافه شدن Ai Replace ✅ و قابلیت های خفن دیگه... 🔘 کپی با ذکر منبع 💎 نکات مهم : ⭕️ 1⃣- واسه کسایی که نصب نمیشه باید نسخه قبلی کپ کات یا هر نسخه‌ی از کپ کات که روی گوشیش هست رو باید حذف کنه و

58😍5👌4🐳1🤷1

16 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC≈27,000 views0 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Poll

کپکات برات راحت میاد بالا یا نه؟

  1. نه باهاش مشکل دارم83%
  2. آره عالیه19%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈32,300 views55 reactionsread 11 September 2026
File

🎞️ Motion Ninja | ویرایشگر حرفه‌ای ویدیو و موشن گرافیک 🌀 📲 نسخه آنلاک‌شده پریمیوم بدون تبلیغات + تمام قابلیت‌ها فعال ✨ موشن نینجا یه ابزار قدرتمند برای ساخت و ویرایش ویدیوهای خلاقانه ، سینمایی و محتوای حرفه‌ای مخصوص اینستاگرام، یوتیوب و تیک‌تاک ـ فقط با موبایل! 🎯 ویژگی‌های برجسته Motion Ninja: 🎬 تدوین حرفه‌ای با تایم‌لاین چندلایه 🎨 ترنزیشن‌ها و افکت‌های سینمایی خیره‌کننده 📍 کی‌فریم دقیق برای کنترل حرکت اجزا 🌀 افکت

48👌4🤷3

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @life_yegan_project. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTCAnonymous Poll445 voters

کپکات برات راحت میاد بالا یا نه؟

  1. نه باهاش مشکل دارم83%
  2. آره عالیه19%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTCAnonymous Poll435 voters

کیا اینجا با کپکات مشکل اساسی دارن و باز نمیشه براشون؟

  1. من مشکل دارم54%
  2. من اصلا ندارم30%
  3. من دارم باهاش کار نمیکنم22%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Life_yegan_project” (@life_yegan_project), 42,072 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/life_yegan_project.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.