Channel
@lidojumi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001882289310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @aerodium @airbalticblog @lidojumi |
| Created | 3 April 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lidojumi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 7 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 7 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 7 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 7 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 3 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Они же не могут верить в то, что говорят – что Россия собирается нападать на НАТО. В это поверить невозможно. А своих людей убеждают. “They can’t really believe what they’re saying – that Russia is going to attack NATO. It’s impossible to believe. Yet they convince their own people.” 💀Putin is…
A decade separates the two events 2015: Turkey, a NATO member, downplays a Russian Su-24 after a 17-second airspace violation. Putin warns of “serious consequences.” 2025: Three Russian MiG-31s enter Estonia’s airspace for 12 minutes. NATO responds with protest and escort. 🛫Aerodium
Investigation: Russian sabotage in Europe [AI-generated illustration] Last summer, a significant sabotage operation orchestrated by Russian intelligence services was exposed, involving individuals from Latvia. Investigative journalist Inga Spriņģe (TV3, 900 sekundes) reports that recruitment occurred through acquaintances rather than conventional espionage methods. One recruit was even assigned the task of setting…
Russia’s “International Affairs” magazine proposed viewing the Baltic region as a “potential theater of military operations.” Aerodium
Posted without readable text
airBaltic postponed a possible IPO to 2026 Speaking to Aktuaalne kaamera, CFO Vitolds Jakovlevs said the airline can wait until 2026 to go public. However, if fuel prices rise or revenues drop in the second half of 2025, airBaltic might have to seek extra funding from shareholders. Aerodium
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lidojumi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 414,085 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lidojumi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aerodium” (@lidojumi), 7 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lidojumi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.