Until an adequate quantum-safe migration plan is proposed with a concrete timeline for implementation, Bitcoin should be considered a long-term short to 0.
🔥2❤1

Channel
@librehash
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,526subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001230091701 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @librehash |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/librehash |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 2,526 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 2,530 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 2,536 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 2,535 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 2,535 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 27 | 61.4% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 20.5% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 9.09% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.27% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2025 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Until an adequate quantum-safe migration plan is proposed with a concrete timeline for implementation, Bitcoin should be considered a long-term short to 0.
🔥2❤1
The quantum clock is ticking: it's Bitcoin's problem, not Ethereum's https://www.coindesk.com/opinion/2026/06/10/the-quantum-clock-is-ticking-it-s-bitcoin-s-problem-not-ethereum-s
Update Regarding the Meeting Between Trump & Xi Jinping in South Korea Trump recently concluded his meeting with Xi Jinping over in South Korea. Thus far, no trade deal has been officially announced, but over the past 10-20 minutes, there have been some substantial statements made and actions taken by both heads of states that seem to indicate that the meeting was highly productive and amicable. 1. Following the me…
🔥1
■□□□□ ℹ️ Data-Leak: Price sheet of 200+ crypto influencers and their wallet addresses from a project they were recently contacted by to promote. From 160+ accounts who accepted the deal I only saw <5 accounts actually disclose the promotional posts as an advertisement. Source: 𝕏 | ZackXBT
❤1
DPRK Adopts EtherHiding: Nation-State Malware Hiding on Blockchains. EtherHiding, a novel technique where the attackers embed malicious payloads (like JADESNOW and INVISIBLEFERRET malware) within smart contracts on public blockchains (like BNB Smart Chain and Ethereum). https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/dprk-adopts-etherhiding/
😱1
Breaking Down First Major Release - Proving the Safe Vulnerability Remember when I mentioned a few months ago that all the Safe contract versions deployed on the Ethereum blockchain contained an exploitable vulnerability that would allow a sufficiently resourced threat actor to exploit and compromise? I shelled that out a little more. This was a difficult vulnerability to prove because creating a PoC (straightforwa…
🔥2❤1
That’s astronomical.
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 CFTC to issue clarification allowing US users to trade on offshore crypto exchanges. @WatcherGuru
Big Release coming today
🔥12
BREAKING: 🇺🇸 President Trump officially signs executive order opening the $12.5 trillion 401(k) retirement market to crypto investments. @WatcherGuru
🤣2❤1👍1
In the 2017 bull market, Bitcoin would make crazy volatile bullish runs. During those runs, alts would consolidate and drop a little because all of the money was flowing into Bitcoin. When Bitcoin stopped running, alt coins would start going crazy as traders cashed out & hopped back into those positions they exited before. Then as the price increases, more money flows into alt coins from Bitcoin instead of vice vers…
💯9
Dogecoin still sending. Easy $$.
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @librehash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 209,417 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Libre Blockchain” (@librehash), 2,526 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/librehash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.