https://t.me/jhokm?livestream=dbad4a7134359794bf
❤1
Signed jhohcawol

Channel
@liberty_vpns
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
34subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003810945279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @liberty_vpns |
| Created | 18 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/liberty_vpns |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 02:00 | 34 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 35 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 34 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 38 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 40 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 40 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
24 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 45.8% | |
| custom 5251482609040526805 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5251752015159140670 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5249226162072231977 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5251728040651688662 | 2 | 8.33% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/jhokm?livestream=dbad4a7134359794bf
❤1
Signed jhohcawol
Так мини розыгрыш, до конца августа. Люди которые будут покупать Liberty 🗽 VPN, будут получать билет. Купить vpn строго за 250₽ За приведенных людей к нам, готовые купить, получают еще 1 билет. Набираете билеты и получаете призы. Как будет проводится розыгрыш? - Всего будет 5 мест. Выигрыш (ДЕНЕЖНЫЙ ПРИЗ) 1 место - 2000₽ 2 место - 1000₽ 3 место - 750₽ 4 место - 450₽ 5 место - 250₽ Вся информация будет тут 👉 @l…
custom 52492261620722319773❤2custom 52517520151591406702
Signed jhohcawol
Отзывы: t.me/namesers
❤4custom 52514826090405268052custom 52517280406516886622
Signed h h
Всех приветствую. Хотел бы поделится с вами информацией. Что в продажу вступил VPN (Happ). Данную подписку, продаём дешевле, чем у остальных пользователей. Так же наш VPN имеет бесконечную подписку. Данный VPN (Happ), уже выпущен в продажу, места не ограничены. Данная цена VPN (Happ) - 400₽ & 4,2$ Принимаем оплату; СБП, Cryptobot, Картой, Ton. По всем интересующимся вопросам, можете обратится в личные сообщения …
❤4custom 52514826090405268052custom 52517520151591406702
Signed h h
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @liberty_vpns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@liberty_vpns named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liberty VPN” (@liberty_vpns), 34 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liberty_vpns.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.